CavsKermit
NBA Starter
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2021
- Messages
- 3,358
- Reaction score
- 4,785
- Points
- 113
Well, if you know for a fact that Hartenstein wouldn't have taken a guaranteed deal, even at the vet minimum from the Cavs, then you know more than me. But, I care because I think Hartenstein on a vet minimum would've been really good value for the Cavs. All other things being equal, it's better to have guys on the roster who are considered value contracts in case you want to make a trade down stream, as opposed to someone who's almost certainly not going to be on the active roster.Water is wet.
Sky is blue.
What is your point?
It takes 2 to sign a contract. Hartenstein opted out of a deal making more than he ended up signing for. Hartenstein fucked up? So what? What do you expect our front office to do about it? They would have taken Hartenstein back. Either he thought he could get more money elsewhere or he didnt want to play for the cavs. Nothing the cavs could do.
So what did the cavs do, they signed a tall prospect named Tacko to a camp invite deal to see if he can make the roster on a non guaranteed vet min contract. The fact this is the 12th page of this thread is amazing, although the fact his name is Tacko and he signed on Tuesday is one page worth of jokes on this thread.
Why the fuck do you care about either? One wouildnt sign and didnt want to be here, the other isnt guaranteed to make any money.