Who will Browns take #1?

[Deadlock]

But thats not the point, a #1 WR isnt going to win you a super bowl. Not in todays NFL.

Randy Moss was traded for peanuts, the Patriots dont have a #1 WR, so I cant see why getting Edwards or Williams is going to make us better.

Fitzgerald and Boldin didnt make Arizona make the playoffs, Edwards isnt going to help us win games.

Bryant, Davis, Cutt and Winslow is a very nice core and is sufficient enough.

I see your point about how having a great wide reciever to win superbowls. The defense pretty much does that.. But in this draft you can't really pass up Edwards if he is still there and we cant trade down. His talent is so much better then all the other players we can take at the 3rd pick. So iin my opinion I say you have to take him if his there and we cant trade down.

 

[FunkyDawg]

Honestly Id like to trade down in the Top 10 still. Possibly pick up Rolle or Pac Man Jones. That would be really nice. I have no faith in McCutcheon as a starting CB. I wouldnt mind him in Dime situations, but a start is very risky.

Then again, I wouldnt mind taking Mike Williams.

Our offense would be sick with Williams, Winslow, Dre, Bryant, Northcutt on 3rd and Longs , no secondary can stop that.

 

[Mac]

PacMan will be there after the 20 pick, even if he isnt, there are DBs just as good as him that will be there in the second round.

 

[NarlCavs]

I think we all want the Browns to trade down but if a good offer doesn't come along than they will take the best player available regardless of position. Honestly, every position on the Browns, except maybe TE, is a position of need.
If Edwards is their highest rated player then take him. They need talent no matter where it's at.

Pac Man is projected as a top 10 pick. I can't see him lasting past 15 or so at the latest.