JSS2306
NBA Starter
- Joined
- May 18, 2010
- Messages
- 7,236
- Reaction score
- 4,914
- Points
- 113
The bold is pretty absurd. You basically admit in the italics that guns would limit mass massacres (which the video focuses on), but try to justify your stance with an absurd assumption that without guns people would start running over innocent children with a car/truck/suv, or start to stab multiple people, neither of which would ever happen.
You curiously left out "bomb" from his quote.
That's interesting since some of the most notorious acts of violence in US history have not been at the hands of guns.
9/11 and the OKC bombing have something to say.
Just recently, Suge Knight obviously didn't need a gun to run dudes over rather than shoot them.
Further, in China (where they aren't allowed to carry guns), just dealt with a mass stabbing this last year.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/mar/02/china-mass-stabbings-yunnan-kunming-rail-station