• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Shootouts and explosions in Paris

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Thanks for this enlightening discussion about this topic. I've really never paid as much attention to the happenings in that part of the world as much as I have in the past couple years, and it's great to hear all sides in a respectful and cohesive manner.

I would like to offer input on the refugee situation...

We HAVE to participate in the acceptance of refugees. It's our responsibility as part of our pacts with nations, and our responsibility to humanity. Refugees are specifically people that are displaced from their home and fear death. Unlike the chronically homeless in the US, or the putrid conditions is all parts of the world, refugees are left with no home nor resources, and need a place to go. I can go deeper into the homeless issue if anyone's interested in knowing what works - my organization develops affordable housing and permanent supportive housing to ensure low income Americans have stable housing.

ISIS does not want refugees leaving. ISIS will do whatever it can to get them back. Any negative reaction to refugees works in their favor. "The Western world rejects you, rejects Islam - your only choice is to return here, and die, or be part of us." If they get 20, 30, 50% of returning refugees, they win. They get stronger. That's why they plant a false refugee passport after the attacks, to further feed that sentiment. That's why they'd love for Trump to become president and hate them, because that will give them more avenues to recruit and gain power.

A policy to simply reject refugees, solely on the basis of their country of origin, will be just as effective in preventing terrorists from coming here as a policy to have white supremacists not bear any more children because a handful of them will turn into mass shooters and kill our children. It's irresponsible. They're already here. And it's not solving the problem, just throwing a blanket on it. By demonizing all Syrians because they may be terrorists, you're only creating animosity, which in turn will create terrorists where there weren't before.

I understand you don't want to deal with them now, and it's not what's being proposed. Refugees are flocking to Greece on inflatable boats because the trip over the Med. Sea is doable, same way it's conceivable that someone can make it over to Florida from Cuba. Do you really think anyone, even an able-bodied man, would be able to essential kayak over the Atlantic with 20 other people to feed? This is 10,000 per year, spread out. They have to be vetted. They have to get on a plane, or at the very least a chartered cargo ship. They have to stay in the squalor of a refugee camp through intense questioning and vetting to even get selected to be sent to America, over the dozens other countries that are closer and accepting refugees.

And when they get here? Not all of them are great. But from what I've seen, refugees are given a 6 month window of support to integrate. Learn the language, figure out how to get a job, and figure out a way to get educated. They do that fast. They stay together as huge nuclear families, and support each other. One goes to school, while the other is a sandwich artist at Mr. Hero. Or at our casino. Once one gets a reasonable degree, they switch roles. They take care of their own, and embrace the opportunity our great country gives them and returns it ten fold. Because the alternative was death.

And there's more that can be done. Our immigration system is whack. Terrorists can easily find ways to enter the country through student visas, through tourism, anything. The biggest anti-immigration measures are related to work - basically crafted to prevent Mexicans jumping the border to take low-paying jobs. Which is why that girl from Germany wasn't allowed in over the summer. That needs to be fixed.

And we can engage these refugees as well. Mandate whistleblower policies. If you know of any immigrants, refugees, or ANYONE thinking about any type of terrorist activity - you're just as responsible as the planners if you don't report it. They hate the terror as much as we do. That's what they're running from. They can work with us to prevent domestic attacks.

I think Trevor Noah said it best (I'm sure others have, but the first place I heard it) "The only way to overcome inhumanity, is humanity itself"

We can't be bullied into stripping our humanity for our personal safety. It breeds inhumanity, which makes the terrorists stronger, in turn makes us even less safe.
This is a well-thought out post, and I understand your points.

But instead of refugees that can't leave saying "Welp, we can't leave, let's forsake everything we believe in and become terrorists" maybe they could stand up for themselves and each other and fight against the extremists.

There has been civil war in our country before, as well as many other countries.

And actually seeing them at least attempt to stand up for themselves and take the fight to the radicals would probably inspire other countries, including the U.S. to assist them in winning.

It's a totally different subject, but when the north wanted to abolish slavery, they didn't just move out of the country and hope other countries would take them in. They fought, lost a lot of lives, and eventually won.

Now I know a lot of the refugees are women and children, so that is still a problem. But there has to be a better answer than to just leave the entire territory free for the radicals to fully colonize.
 
This is a well-thought out post, and I understand your points.

But instead of refugees that can't leave saying "Welp, we can't leave, let's forsake everything we believe in and become terrorists" maybe they could stand up for themselves and each other and fight against the extremists.

There has been civil war in our country before, as well as many other countries.

And actually seeing them at least attempt to stand up for themselves and take the fight to the radicals would probably inspire other countries, including the U.S. to assist them in winning.

It's a totally different subject, but when the north wanted to abolish slavery, they didn't just move out of the country and hope other countries would take them in. They fought, lost a lot of lives, and eventually won.

Now I know a lot of the refugees are women and children, so that is still a problem. But there has to be a better answer than to just leave the entire territory free for the radicals to fully colonize.
This is ignorant. Generally, the refugees have no weapons. The crazies come into town and line people up and shoot. The crazies are at least somewhat trained, armed, and organized.
Why stay when your town is burning or bombed?
Why stay when you were walking home from the market and you pass your neighbor's corpse that wasn't there when you left?
Things are broken there. Infrastructure, the economy, safety. All broken.

Plus, there is a civil war. There are fighters on more than 2 sides in this one.

Trust me, these people are almost all normal people making a very rational decision. You don't just leave your house with what you can carry unless shit got really real.

There's just no way to compare such this how you did.
 
My point is that I don't think the majority would just instantly join their side.

Also isn't it a bad idea to just cede the territory to the radicals?
 
Brussels on lock down. Tcitizens told to avoid crowds. Basically city on lock down.

Weapons and explosives found.
 
My point is that I don't think the majority would just instantly join their side.

Also isn't it a bad idea to just cede the territory to the radicals?

Right. The overwhelming majority would not. Maybe something along the lines of none. Not sure. Maybe children after years in the system if kidnapped.

It is a bad idea. It's just a better idea than dying. Leaving the fighting to Iran's military with Russian air cover is at least a start. Now ISIS has to contend w France and her allies, so the caliphate is (IMO) done.

The question becomes how many thousands of extremists have already mobilized and how many more will? Also, how many will be borne out of this rising anti-Muslim alienation? My guess is the former is an order of magnitude more important.
 
Brussels on lock down. Tcitizens told to avoid crowds. Basically city on lock down.

Weapons and explosives found.

I hate shit like this.

Fuck you - you don't get to force those rules upon me you shitheads.

ALL LIES
 
My point is that I don't think the majority would just instantly join their side.

Also isn't it a bad idea to just cede the territory to the radicals?

Just cede to radicals? As if it's so easy not to do that. Imagine you are with your wife and two children and there is an armed militia two streets over dragging people into the streets and beheading them. Do you stay and "fight" with your cooking utensils, or do you get the hell out of dodge?

I've said it before, google Raqqa and select images. No civilian in their right mind is sticking around for that. I'd take the raft too.
 

If we are going to do this, we are entitled to a clear statement/committment from our government regarding what checks are going to be done. A CNN article based on leaks from unnamed government officials don't cut it, at least for me. And Congress, apparently.

The article also does not address the two specific arguments I raised.

First, the article repeatedly talks about checking refugee applicants against "databases". But the FBI director very clearly stated that we simply do not have the type of databases for Syrians that we do for others coming in. As he said, you can check and recheck people against your database, but if your database is limited, it doesn't do much good. Nobody has addressed that objection.

Second, the article describes the checks performed when we've had less than 1000 Syrian refugees a year entering. But with the President stating that we're going to accept 10,000 per year, the assets required are going to increase more than tenfold, and there's a real risk that standards will drop to meet his mandate. The manpower assets we would have to devote to investigate that ntensively refugees coming from Syria is not worth it.
 
This is ignorant. Generally, the refugees have no weapons. The crazies come into town and line people up and shoot. The crazies are at least somewhat trained, armed, and organized.
Why stay when your town is burning or bombed?
Why stay when you were walking home from the market and you pass your neighbor's corpse that wasn't there when you left?
Things are broken there. Infrastructure, the economy, safety. All broken.

Plus, there is a civil war. There are fighters on more than 2 sides in this one.

Trust me, these people are almost all normal people making a very rational decision. You don't just leave your house with what you can carry unless shit got really real.

There's just no way to compare such this how you did.

That's a fair point, but doesn't it cut both ways?

If ISIS coming in, ruining lives, and deliberately mudering civilians over an extended period of time isn't going to induce many people to flee their control and then join the fight against them, then the argument that incidental casualties caused by strikes against ISIS and AQ Q is this great recruiting tool for them must be bogus as well.
 
I was watching Bill Maher last night and there was this women on getting offended at Bill Maher saying aspects of Sharia Law do not meet the American culture. He used examples of Women as 2nd clas citizens and she kept going on how he cant call another religion bad. Maher then asked if she thought a rape victim should be blamed and murdered and she dodged it but kept saying how you cant call another religion bad.

Ultimately this is one of the biggest issues. This country has gotten so politically fucking correct that we can no longer have a real conversation.

Fact, Sharia Law is Islamic Law. No, no all Muslims believe in it to the extreme, but a large percentage do(10%-50% depending on who you believe)

Fact, some very bad things are part of Sharia Law like killing women that have been raped for shaming their families.

Fact, some will argue against this post because i am not being politically correct for bringing this up or suddenly i am saying all Muslims want to kill rape victims.

But the issue is this is all true, and until we recognize the truths about Islamic law. Yes, Christianity and other religions can be brutal to if taken literal, but very, very few Christians(or Jews) practice a 100% literal version of their religion. I go to my synagogue all the time, i have yet to see an animal sacrifice.

I consider myself a moderate that has voted for both parties lately. I hate nothing more than the religious right because i find them dangerous and close minded. They feel only their morality matters and have no concept of separation of Church and state. But lately, the extreme left is even more dangerous as their inability to have real conversations will prevent us from doing anything about a very serious problem in this world, and that is the Islamic Religion practiced in its extreme forms.
 
I was watching Bill Maher last night and there was this women on getting offended at Bill Maher saying aspects of Sharia Law do not meet the American culture. He used examples of Women as 2nd clas citizens and she kept going on how he cant call another religion bad. Maher then asked if she thought a rape victim should be blamed and murdered and she dodged it but kept saying how you cant call another religion bad.

Ultimately this is one of the biggest issues. This country has gotten so politically fucking correct that we can no longer have a real conversation.

Fact, Sharia Law is Islamic Law. No, no all Muslims believe in it to the extreme, but a large percentage do(10%-50% depending on who you believe)

Fact, some very bad things are part of Sharia Law like killing women that have been raped for shaming their families.

Fact, some will argue against this post because i am not being politically correct for bringing this up or suddenly i am saying all Muslims want to kill rape victims.

But the issue is this is all true, and until we recognize the truths about Islamic law. Yes, Christianity and other religions can be brutal to if taken literal, but very, very few Christians(or Jews) practice a 100% literal version of their religion. I go to my synagogue all the time, i have yet to see an animal sacrifice.

I consider myself a moderate that has voted for both parties lately. I hate nothing more than the religious right because i find them dangerous and close minded. They feel only their morality matters and have no concept of separation of Church and state. But lately, the extreme left is even more dangerous as their inability to have real conversations will prevent us from doing anything about a very serious problem in this world, and that is the Islamic Religion practiced in its extreme forms.

Bigot...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lee
The difference is that the U.S. has made it easy for the Muslim radicals to get support. They make recruiting a piece of cake by killing off their family members, bombing their homes, starving them with sanctions, propping up brutal regimes. Then they also send them money and arms either directly or through other countries.

These ideas in Islam are as old as Islam itself and there are large swaths of "moderate" Muslims that buy into the idea that their people and beyond should live by Sharia in society.

88% of Muslims in Egypt favor the death penalty for apostasy (leaving Islam). There are 80 million Muslims who live in Egypt and they are suppose to be moderate in the region.

84% of Pakistanis believe Sharia should be the law of the land. There are 178 million Muslims who live in Pakistan.

82% of Bangladesh Muslims believe Sharia should be the law of the land. There are 149 million Muslims in Bangladesh

86% of Malaysians believe Sharia should be the law of the land. There are 20 million Muslims in Malaysia. 91% in Iraq. Add another 20 million.

http://www.pewforum.org/files/2013/04/worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-full-report.pdf

This doesn't even represent close to the Muslim population as a whole.

Say what you want about Christians but I've never heard of a modern Christian giving credence to the thought of lashes for alchohol use, stoning women, cutting off hands for stealing, and the death penalty for gays and adultery.

Fuck outta here. Islam has major fundamental problems and that's why when ISIS is "defeated" there'll be 10 more groups ready to take its place.

Due to the subjective and often violent nature in texts of Islamic faith, there will always be extremism.

Saudi Arabia is the richest in the region and also the most extreme. They round up a few terrorists here and there to maintain their status and relationship with the US but they also maintain as one of the cruelest societies in the world.

Punishments_FINAL-01.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lee
Uh-oh...Anonymous just issued a statement saying major attacks around the world are scheduled for tomorrow including in the US. They are planning an assault at the WWE Survivor Series tomorrow night. They've given their proof and the list of the planned attacks to MI5, CIA, and FBI.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top