• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Analysis of trade possibilities

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Out of the Rafters at the Q

Out of the Rafters
Joined
Aug 18, 2008
Messages
26,222
Reaction score
55,914
Points
148
This is a general analysis of the trade possibilities for the Cavs this year. Before delving into what we need, we need to examine what we have, both short and long term.

PG- Mo Williams is the starter for the foreseeable future, and I love it. He can push the ball, has great handles, is one of the best mid-range shooters in the NBA (Was second in fg% for two-point shots outside the key last year), and is a good guy on a reasonable contract.

Boobie showed that he is ready to shine. He can create off the dribble, and is apparently lights out coming off screens. Can be an effective SG or PG.

Delonte West is an interesting guy. He has PG skills, but his main asset is his hustle, especially on defense. While I love Delonte, you have to ask, if we get a starting SG, would we really be that well off with Boobie and Delonte coming off the bench? Or would we be better off with someone with size? At this point, I like Delonte, but if he's a key to getting a starting SG or PF, I think he's movable.

SG- Sasha Pavlovic is still young, and can play the 2 or 3. He can get to the hole and play defense. However, he's as inconsistent as it gets. He probably doesn't have any trade value. My ideal situation would be to have Sasha as the backup at the 2/3, but if he comes in and doesn't have it on that night, we could have a veteran swingman to bring off the bench instead of him.

Wally at this point, is just a 13 million expiring. He's our primary trade asset.

Kinsey is an end-of-the-bench guy until I see anything more out of him.

SF- LeBron. Enough said.

PF- Ben, at this point in his career, would be a terrific defensive presence playing 20 minutes or so a night. I just don't want to have to have him play 30 minutes a night due to his back. If he can look like he did last night for 20 minutes a game, he'll be a valuable contributor.

JJ Hickson has loads of potential. He could be a poor man's amare. I love his explosiveness and I see him as a terrific backup PF for the considerable future.

Darnell Jackson, if he pans out, can be our 5th or 6th big. That's about it.

C- Z looks like he's slowing down even more. I love him, but I expect him to retire after 2010. Until then though, he's our starter.

AV looks like a beast. Our starting C for the future? I think so. Unless we find a starting-caliber center and move AV over to our starting PF, in which case I'd wet my pants in excitement.

Wright actually looks surprisingly decent this year. I didn't expect his mid-range jumper to be this good. He's a great vet min player for this year, and MAYBE even next year.

So, as our roster stands, we are solid at starting PG, SF, and C. We are set with guards off the bench, and with AV, Hickson and Wright, we're set with bigs off the bench as well. For the short-term, our two primary needs are starting SG and starting PF.

For the long-term, our team is set at starting PG and SF. With AV, we also have one of our starting bigs, assuming we can re-sign him. With Gibson, West, Pavs, Hickson, Jackson, our bench looks pretty solid as well. Areas of need for the future are Starting SG, and either a starting Center, or a starting PF plus a player who has the size to play center to backup AV.

In summary, short-term needs: Starting SG, Starting PF

Long-term needs: Starting SG, and EITHER Starting C OR Starting PF + a backup C.

Our assets are: Wally's 13 million expiring, Snow's 7.3 million expiring, Delonte West, Sasha Pavlovic, Big Ben's 14.5 million dollar contract, that expires next year, plus draft picks.

After looking at the NBA rosters, here are all the potential targets for SG. These are players that could be available this year:

Vince Carter
Jamal Crawford
Ben Gordon
Anthony Parker
Mike Dunleavy
Michael Redd
Joe Johnson
Jason Richardson
Gerald Wallace
Mike Miller
Martell Webster
Stephen Jackson
Cuttino Mobley
John Salmons

Players whose contracts will not affect our 2010 capspace:

Anthony Parker
Joe Johnson
Mike Miller
Stephen Jackson
Cuttino Mobley

So, if you want to get a starting SG AND be able to sign LeBron + Bosh or whatever in 2010, your choices become extremely limited. Anthony Parker and Cuttino Mobley really aren't much of an improvement, if any, over Sasha or West, so that leaves you with Joe Johnson, Mike Miller, and Stephen Jackson.

Joe is more or less a dream. Yes, he'd be perfect, but the ONLY way the Hawks trade him is if they're doing poorly AND he demands a trade. Even then, there are teams out there who can offer the Hawks more young talent than we can. As much as I'd love him, odds are he's not coming here.

Mike Miller probably is not for sale either. The only reason the T'Wolves had to trade him is if they want to move him + Cardinal + Madsen for an expiring in order to go after the 09 free agent class. However, with Bynum reaching an extension with the Lakers yesterday, I really don't see any incentive for the Wolves to make a move for 09. They like Miller, and they'll just hang on to him.

Stephen Jackson would be an improvement at SG, but he's already 30 years old, and only shot 40% from the field last year, plus we're not sure if he can guards SG's anymore. His best position is SF, and while he might be a small upgrade talent-wise, he doesn't solve our problem long-term, and he might do more harm than good in the short term by messing up chemistry and chucking up shots.

So, if we want to upgrade our SG, that leaves us with players who run into 2010.

John Salmons would be a nice player. He's 29, but he's a great defender who's efficient from the field and can slash to the hole. He has a player option in 2010, but even if he picks it up, it's only 5.8 million. What would the Kings want for him? Either we'd have to take on Kenny Thomas's contract, or we'd have to give up probably West + a pick.

Martell Webster would fit in very nicely. He's 22, and is developing a nice all-around game. He could be our starting SG for the next 8 years, but, he probably will never be a star-quality player. What would the Blazers want for him? Probably nothing we have. They don't need an expiring, they don't want draft picks, and the only reason they'd trade away anyone right now is for a significant upgrade at SF or PG, neither of which we can offer them. Our best chance of acquiring Webster is a three-way, in which a team sends Portland either a stud PG or SF, we send that team expirings and West or draft picks, and we get Webster.

Gerald Wallace is an intriguing case. He might be available, if the Bobcats feel Morrison is ready to start. However, he's one concussion away from not playing again, his natural position is SF, his defense relies heavily on gambling for steals, and he can't shoot. He's a slasher who reminds me a lot of Larry Hughes, except competitive. I think he'd be an upgrade, but his contract goes until 2012-2013, and his lack of an outside shot coupled with injury history just doesn't sit well with me.

Jason Richardson would be a great pickup. He can do it all, and his game has really developed. If the Bobcats decide to go with Wallace and Morrison starting, J-Rich could be available. However, given that the Bobcats just gave up their 5th overall pick for him last year, I don't see them trading him away this year, for significantly less.

Michael Redd didn't work well with Mo in Milwaukee, and Milwaukee doesn't look like they have the pieces to go into full-blown rebuilding. I just don't see Redd coming here.

Mike Dunleavy and Jamal Crawford are not worth their contracts, and Ben Gordon would not only be a bad fit, but wants way too much money.

Vince Carter is 31, and his contract runs through 2010-2011. However, over the past three years, he's only missed a total of 9 games, and has averaged almost 38 minutes a game while shooting 45% from the field, 35% from three, with 6 rebounds, 5 assists and a steal per game. The Nets would want a good deal for him, probably including West, at least one first and Wally's expiring.

So, the options we are left at for SG are:

Vince Carter
John Salmons
Gerald Wallace
Martell Webster

Every one of them would cost us 2010 cap room. Vince would cost us 17.5 million, Salmons might cost us 5.8, or he could opt out. G-Force would cost us 9.5, and Webster is up for a new contract after this year, so he could cost maybe around 6 or 7 million..




The possibilities for starting PF are:

Kenyon Martin
Nene
Al Harrington
Troy Murphy
Darko Milicic
Udonis Haslem
Zach Randolph
Chris Wilcox
Nick Collison
Channing Frye
Mikki Moore
Andrei Kirilenko

Again, let's first sort it by those who will affect our 2010 cap space and those who won't.

Will not affect 2010 cap space:

Al Harrington
Darko Milicic
Udonis Haslem
Chris Wilcox
Channing Frye
Mikki Moore

Al Harrington's game just doesn't fit here. He's a perimeter-oriented PF/SF who doesn't rebound particularly well or play low post defense that well either.

Darko is an intriguing player. He can play PF or C, and is only 23. He's never going to stud out, but could he develop into an average starting center? He passes well, and can hit a 15 foot jumper. He can also block shots, and is reasonably athletic for a seven footer. While he's not the missing championship piece, he could help this team out past 2010 when Z is gone. For now, I'd leave him out of trade options and more like someone to look at in free agency.

Haslem is an undersized hustle player who can hit a midrange shot. Again, not the low post presence we're looking for.

Chris Wilcox appears to be a good option, but the best comparison there is would be a low-post oriented Drew Gooden. Wilcox would be great for us offensively, but the mental lapses on defense are the exact reason why we got rid of Drew. If OKC wants to move him for cheap, I'd be all for us taking a shot on him, but I wouldn't give up West or a 1st or anything of value for him.

Channing Frye has been buried under Portland's depth chart. He's a tall, lanky PF who is pretty skilled offensively. He is lacking in both the muscle department and defensive department. However, I think we could develop him into a solid contributor on both ends of the floor. Looking down the road, if your top 3 bigs are AV, Hickson, and Frye, is that so bad?

Mikki Moore can be had for cheap this year, and would solidify our depth up front. He's not a low-post threat or a long-term solution.

Ok, now onto the PF's that would affect our 2010 cap space:

Troy Murphy could probably be had for rather cheap, and is a good rebounder. However, he doesn't play in the post offensively. He's more of a shooter. Plus, I'm not sure the Pacers want to trade within the division. He's also grossly overpaid, which doesn't really make sense for us.

Zach Randolph: Everyone has his own opinion on Z-Bo. I'm not going to go in depth on him.

Nick Collison would be a solid backup big, he rebounds well and shoots 50% from the field. He is due 6.75 million in 2010-2011. Again, he wouldn't be that star PF we need, but he'd be a solid addition.

Andrei Kirilenko could work here, or he could not. This is debatable. However, I don't see the Jazz trading him, at least during this season. The only way they make such a big move, dumping AK47 for expirings and draft picks/youth is if they aren't in contention, and I just can't imagine that happening.

Nene and K-Mart... two of the worst contracts in the NBA... but, they both are semi-productive players. IF we decide to abandon our 2010 push for LBJ + Bosh, either one of these could be had for cheap, one would think. However, at their contract and their injury history, I think we should avoid both of them. K-Mart's deal runs through 2010-2011, while Nene's goes a year longer.

So, the best options right now at PF are...

Darko Milicic
Channing Frye
Chris Wilcox

All three could make sense here. Darko might be had for very cheap, considering Marc Gasol has already jumped ahead of him in the rotation. I'm not sure what the Blazers would want for Frye, it would probably have to be a three-way. Wilcox makes sense for us, but he's already expiring, so what would OKC want? I'm certainly not ready to trade West for him.

So, in summary, here are a few trade options:

Trade one, Frye and Webster from Portland

Trade two, Gerald Wallace from Charlotte

Trade three, Vince Carter from New Jersey

Trade four, John Salmons from Sacramento

Trade five, Darko Milicic from Memphis

Trade six, Chris Wilcox from Oklahoma City

I'd like to pick your guys' brains now. Give me possibilities for these six trades, and we'll work to post the best ones in this thread.
 
Last edited:
No comments? None at all?

Most of the people who post in trade ideas are kiddos who come in and throw some crap on the wall, they do not take the time to post anything intelectual. So you probably ran them off. I personally try and stay away from most of these trade forums cause it just seems like a waste of my time. I think you did a good job, but for the guys who spend so much time in this section of forums, your post was probably a wall of text that had to many facts and they just skipped over it.
 
No comments? None at all?

Good so far -- much better than most of the Wizard of Oz trade ideas that are out there...but I think your point so far is that there are no good trade possibilities...right? I feel the same way -- which begs the question...why don't we spend more time developing the potential talent we have? Lets give some of Wally and Pavs trash minutes to Kinsey -- since they both are average at best...and since Wally is gone either way. We let him expire or we trade his expiring for ??? But It's hard to think that Kinsey could do much worse, but the upside of giving him small but regular playing time could be huge.

I look forward to reading your analysis of the trade possibilities for PF.
 
I didn't post because of the fact you were not done yet. You seem to have a great grasp of what is going on right now in the trade situations. I believe a big man is the biggest need for this team, but a Sg is no second prize by any means. The bigts that are available may not be what we need and if that is the case then we should definately go towards a SG and you have made a great list of people who IMO is going to be for the most part available.
 
Ok, finished the post. For anyone out there who has the time to read it, I hope it was worth your time.

I'm now taking ideas for those six trades. We'll try to provide constructive criticism to arrive at pretty reasonable trades for all six scenarios.
 
How about younger rising shooting guards like Rashad McCants and Kelenna Azubuike?
What about younger, but not used bigs like Sean Williams and Eddy Curry (I think he can regain past form with title contender)?
Great research and well written!
 
Very very in depth post. A little long and hard on the eyes this late at night but I found it hard not to read it after I started (not that I am addicted to trades or anything ;)). I love the idea of filling out our PF spot because to me the depth just is not there in order to make it through an 82 game season. Also it would be a nice long term move to fill up the C spot by getting someone who can play PF/C.

Darko is my choice for this as he is a 2010 guy and if he isn't working out backing up big Z then we can let him walk, or trade him with our other 2010 expiring BW. But if we see signs that he is working hard and improving our team then by all means resign him for a possible starting role in 2010 (If Z doesn't play or start). Also if we got Darko he would have three great bigs to learn from in AV, Z and BW. Say what you want about the fact that he was a wasted lottery pick, he was not our wasted lottery pick and if he had of been drafted in the late 20's he would be considered a solid contributer.

Frye is an expiring this year, and I think Portland would like to get talent back not just a way to kill cap space so he is kind of out of our reach. Likewise Wilcox is an expiring so why would OKC want to trade us him for Wally? Maybe if we could work out a Colison + Wilcox deal, but I think that would be too much for us to ask for with Wally's contract.

Sg is IMO the easiest position for us to fill this year just based on the amount of trade rumours already this season and we are like 4 games in. Add that to the unknown financial situation and the Cavs could ultimately clean up this year. Any SG we get would obviously have to be a scorer to spread the floor and to make our offense a pick your poison. And the shooting guard will have to be able to play good D.

VC is most likely to be available, even now if we really wanted him lol. Which I really do, but we should use Wally and those picks at the deadline just to see what is out there. Maybe another Gasol type trade happens this year? I don't know maybe another 11 player deal happens (god I hope not to us). The point is at the deadline there could be fifty better options than VC (unlikely).

Any way I want VC, J-Rich, Jefferson, Gordon, Salmons, Miller, Dunleavy, Jackson, Redd. Pretty much in that order with Redd definately bringing up the rear.

All of them can play O, but most i'm not familiar enough with their games to comment. VC is an adequate defender and is still one of the best offensive players in the NBA, easily available because the Nets want to get you know who. JRich can play decent D and is lights out offensively, but he is not really available barring a huge meltdown and even then it is slim. Jefferson is probably the most balanced player on this list and would be a great addition but is most likely not available because the Bucks just got him. Gordon is on the outs and would most likely walk because we could not offer him the money he wants. Salmons is awesome on both ends especially defensively which is just what IMO we need at SG, but Sac wants to run the offense through him more this year so he is most likely unavailable. Miller is to sslow to play amazing D but he could play good D and is a great fit here offensively. He is most likely unavailable though as he was just traded. Dunleavy I don't know what is going on with him because he hasn't played this year for Indiana as far as I know and he is a great offensive player who is a SF, but they also have Granger who is a SF and is just signed to an extension. Jackson is GSW best option on offense and is most likely unavailable at the moment, but could free up by mid season if they are really sucking which they will be. He is a good defender and a good spot up shooter and can take his man off the dribble quite well. Redd is a good last option. I just don't want to create the Bucks plus LBJ it just doesn't make to much sense unless we can be sure that Mo and Redd can shore up the chemistry problems they had in Mil. Redd is from what I have seen this season, he is not exactly the defensive liability that i've thought he was, but he is older, and he is also injured right now which could become a problem later in the year. He is a guy that could come in and score on pull up jumpers created by LBJ and Mo which would be a great thing, and would help our offensive flow and overall points, but also increasing our overall points allowed.

Ok there is my thoughts on the possibilities if you want me to make specualtion about trades such as Wally first for VC then I will just let me know.
 
How about younger rising shooting guards like Rashad McCants and Kelenna Azubuike?
What about younger, but not used bigs like Sean Williams and Eddy Curry (I think he can regain past form with title contender)?
Great research and well written!

Eddy Curry plays center, and he's pretty much the polar opposite of what Mike Brown wants in his bigs. He might be the worst rebounding 7 footer ever, and has matching defense.

Sean Williams would be nice, but again, the Nets wouldn't trade him just for cap room. They'd want young talent as well, and would you be willing to give up West, Boobie, AV, or a first for him? I sure wouldn't.

I don't see McCants or Azubuike as upgrades for us. They're both undersized, and I'd take Delonte West starting at SG over either of them. Of the two, I think McCants could be a possibility if we trade away West and need someone to replace him.
 
I think Sean Williams could be a perfect fit for our team; young, defensive-minded, and has a ton of upside. I'm not sure it would take a whole lot to get him either. The Nets are loaded at the PF/C position with lots of young players. In fact, Williams has not played a minute this season.

If we can't get Williams, I think we should keep an eye on the Clippers. So far, their team does not look good, and their owner is notoriously cheap. If they are out of the playoff picture by mid-season, they might be willing to dump Camby and/or Mobley. Wally/Pavs for Camby/Mobley trade would definitely be an upgrade. The Clippers would save about $14mil, and we would get defensive-minded veterans who can still contribute. We also wouldn't use up any cap space in 2010-11.
 
I've had the Clippers and Camby in mind as well. As far as Sean Williams, I really get the feeling New Jersey will not have anything to do with possibly making the Cavs better (unless of course NJ views the trade is overwhelmingly in the Nets' favor). I know people say "well Wally was offered for Vince and the Nets thought about it", but I highly doubt how serious Thorn was thinking about it.
 
CAVS: Trade: Wally/AV/Kinsey/Williams/09' st Pick
Get: G-Force/Lee/Camby/Jordan

NY KNICKS: Trade: Zach/Lee
Get: Wally/Williams

BOBCATS: Trade: G-Force/Morrison
Get: Zack/Kinsey/Cavs 09' st Pick

CLIPPERS: Trade: Camby/Jordan
Get: AV/Morrison


Mo /Gibson/Snow
G-Force /West
LBJ /Pavs
Lee / Wallace/JJ/Jackson
Z /Camby/Wright/Jordan
 
CAVS: Trade: Wally/AV/Kinsey/Williams/09' st Pick
Get: G-Force/Lee/Camby/Jordan

NY KNICKS: Trade: Zach/Lee
Get: Wally/Williams

BOBCATS: Trade: G-Force/Morrison
Get: Zack/Kinsey/Cavs 09' st Pick

CLIPPERS: Trade: Camby/Jordan
Get: AV/Morrison


Mo /Gibson/Snow
G-Force /West
LBJ /Pavs
Lee / Wallace/JJ/Jackson
Z /Camby/Wright/Jordan

Please no Ferry mega trades for awhile at least. We might improve, but we forsake chemistry. And by the way the only benefit the Bobcats get is the '09 pick. They receive a cancer in Zack Randolph and a near black hole in Kinsey. I'd strike that trade idea out right now. Besides, I'd be against any business with the Knicks whatsoever since their all about going after our superstar. Leave that team terrible.
 
I'd prefer to work out some kind of trade for Wilcox without giving up too much. I'd address the the hole at C when Z retires in the draft. As far as the 2 guard position, hopefully something comes up where we can use Wally's expiring.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-15: "Cavs Survive and Advance"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:15: Cavs Survive and Advance
Top