• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Buckeyes ranked 10th in USA Today poll

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Smooth

Your Writer’s Favorite Writer
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
14,960
Reaction score
42,029
Points
148
Surprised how high they ended up:

1. USC (45) 0-0 1,481
2. LSU (4) 0-0 1,372
3. Florida (9) 0-0 1,278
4. Texas 0-0 1,231
5. Michigan (2) 0-0 1,218
6. West Virginia 0-0 1,205
7. Wisconsin 0-0 1,114
8. Oklahoma 0-0 1,026
9. Virginia Tech 0-0 1,005
10. Ohio State 0-0 919
11. Louisville 0-0 836
12. California 0-0 763
13. Georgia 0-0 604
14. Auburn 0-0 595
15. Tennessee 0-0 583
16. Rutgers 0-0 466
17. UCLA 0-0 454
18. Penn State 0-0 440
19. Nebraska 0-0 388
20. Arkansas 0-0 360
21. Florida State 0-0 301
22. TCU 0-0 233
23. Boise State 0-0 222
24. Hawaii 0-0 214
25. Texas A&M 0-0 209

Others Recieving Votes
Boston College 150, Georgia Tech 150, Miami (FL) 91, Notre Dame 90, South Carolina 90, Wake Forest 71, Missouri 58, Oregon State 52, Brigham Young 47, Clemson 30, Oregon 30, South Florida 26, Texas Tech 20, Alabama 16, Oklahoma State 15, Southern Miss 14, Iowa 12, Kansas State 8, Memphis 5, Houston 4, Arizona 1, Duke 1, Kentucky 1, Washington State 1.

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/rankingsindex
 
LSU will have a hard time staying undefeated this year, they have by far one of the hardest schedules in college. VT, UF, Arkansas and Auburn....
 
I think we'll lose 2 games...I'd say Wisconsin and PSU...but we'll take Michigan.
 
I hate seeing USC at the top... Another year of Saturday hell in my household..

She doesn't shut up about it.. :(
 
LePIP said:
I hate seeing USC at the top... Another year of Saturday hell in my household..

She doesn't shut up about it.. :(

You own bragging rights until SC vs UCLA

UCLA physically removed them from the Nat'l Title game...until you're beaten you're on top.
 
Pac-10 Football....:thumbdown
 
ACC football :thumbdown:
 
Its a shame UVA and VT couldnt be in the SEC.
 
If they were, they'd finish in the bottom half every year. UV last.
 
No dame in there eh. Blahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
 
This Ohio State team reminds me a lot of the 2002 National Championship team. Dominant defense, (Just switch Mike Doss for James Laurinaitis) playmaking CB (Jenkins for Gamble), big, fast D-Line (Gholston, Wilson, and co. for Will Smith and co.), big, fast, pound-right-through-you RB (Wells for Clarett), and an upstart QB who no one thinks can win the big one. (Assuming Boeckman starts over Henton for Krenzel).

Only downside I see is the WR's arent up to par as 2002, Krenzel has playing time, and even with Maurice Wells we aren't as deep at RB since Clarett had Ross behind him.
 
Good Read.

My fellow Americans, as tempting as it may be to don the coat and HD-ready tie in order to deliver this State of the Game address before the cameras, I know better. As Brad Paisley sings on his latest album, "I'm so much cooler online."

The ideas for this annual essay to kick off the ESPN.com college football preview flowed like frat-house beer, which is to say they were cheap and spilled all over the floor. The 2007 season will be better than 2006, if only because there will be more of it. A year ago, the NCAA Football Rules Committee made two rule changes in the interest of speeding up the game. These changes went over like Kobe burgers at a vegan banquet.

To its credit, the rules committee rectified its mistakes. This season the clock once again will start when a kickoff is received, rather than when it is kicked, and the clock will not start so quickly on a change of possession.

However, kickoffs have been moved back five yards, to the 30, which will force more returns. (Thus forcing the clock to run. Clever, huh?) Special teams might decide a lot of games, because coaching strategy will come straight out of another new Paisley lyric (almost), I'd like to check you for kicks.

Paisley sings with a twang, which is why he's appropriate for this college football season. The sun coming up over the 2007 college football season rises from the south. It's a Southern football world. As the Southeastern Conference begins its 75th year, the power shift is noticeable.

Eight-figure budgets, glamorous settings -- and that's just for the head coaches. The SEC has four coaches who have won national championships -- the greatest aggregation of coaching know-how since Eddie Robinson dined alone.

Steve Spurrier, Phil Fulmer, Nick Saban and Urban Meyer have given lie to the idea that a conference championship game is too daunting a hurdle on the road to No. 1. In six of the past 10 seasons, the national champions played and won a conference championship game -- three of the six (Tennessee, 1998; LSU, 2003; Florida, 2006) from the SEC.

There will be more of the same this season, if the preseason prognostications are correct. Six SEC teams are in the preseason coaches' poll, more than from any other conference. Only one conference has talent so deep that a team with 15 returning starters, including the best quarterback in the league, from an eight-win season is considered an afterthought. That may speak more to Kentucky's losing legacy than to the wisdom of the predictions, but there you have it. And seriously, keep an eye on Wildcats QB Andre' Woodson.

Southern California QB John David Booty has Southern roots.

The reach of the South extends all the way to No. 1. Take a look at the team that is a consensus pick to win the national championship. The quarterback is from Shreveport. The best wide receiver is from Nashville. The top recruit is from New Orleans.

So what's the campus doing in Los Angeles? Hey, it is the University of Southern California.

USC lost two Pacific-10 Conference games a year ago, the first time that had happened in five seasons, and university officials withstood the urge to form blue-ribbon panels to unearth the cause of such a disaster. Instead, the Trojans gathered themselves and routed Michigan, 32-18, in the Rose Bowl.

USC's losses at Oregon State and at UCLA last year should have given pause to those who question the Pac-10's football prowess (such as, without naming names, L.M. from Baton Rouge). The league only got deeper this season; Dennis Erickson is taking over an Arizona State team that never quite got out of its own way under his predecessor, Dirk Koetter.

Erickson will resume his quest to become the first coach to win a national championship at two schools. Both he and Spurrier, now in his third season at South Carolina, returned to college football at schools with lower profiles than where they won their titles.

That isn't the case for the third coach looking for the national championship double. You may have missed this, but NASA reported the astronauts on the space shuttle last spring made contact with what can only be described as beings from another galaxy.

The leader of the aliens said, "We come in peace," followed by, "So how do you think Nick Saban will do at Alabama?"

The public is reacting to the new Crimson Tide coach as if he is the Barry Bonds of college football -- beloved at home for what his fans believe he is going to do, hated on the road for his intimidating attitude and for what his detractors believe he did (bend NCAA recruiting rules). I made this comparison from the dais at a charity dinner in Mobile, Ala., last month, and the chill that washed over me didn't come from the air conditioning.

Saban will attempt to prove that he can remake in Tuscaloosa what he built in Baton Rouge, much like another member of the national championship fraternity. Bobby Bowden is attempting to remake at Florida State what he built at, um, Florida State. Bowden rebuilt his offensive staff, bringing in four new coaches led by Saban's former offensive coordinator, Jimbo Fisher, to jump-start an offense that has been dead for a couple of years.

The Atlantic Coast Conference is expected to show new signs of life, too. That is said with no disrespect toward last season's champion, Wake Forest, which provided one of the best story lines of 2006. The Demon Deacons begin this season in their customary position, overshadowed by the Virginia Techs, Miamis and Florida States.

It's not that Wake will find it difficult to duplicate its success in 2006 as much as the feeling that success engendered. Surprising success is the narcotic of sport. It never feels quite so euphoric the next time. Big East commissioner Mike Tranghese has figured this out. He refers to 2006, when a league looked down upon by fans and foes alike took three undefeated teams into November, as "Cinderella."

The fairy tale may be over, but the Big East has four genuine Heisman Trophy candidates in Louisville quarterback Brian Brohm, West Virginia tailback Steve Slaton and quarterback Pat White, and Rutgers tailback Ray Rice. Rutgers, as did Wake Forest and, of course, Boise State, proved last season that the have-nots in college football occasionally have quite a lot.


The Broncos' rousing 43-42 overtime victory over Oklahoma in the Fiesta Bowl has raised the profile of all schools in conferences that don't get automatic BCS bids. This season, TCU and Hawaii are the preseason favorites to burst through the BCS doors and earn an at-large bid. The Warriors return 14 starters from an 11-3 team, including quarterback Colt Brennan.


Brennan not only broke the single-season record with 58 touchdown passes in 2006, but he also led Division I-A in passing efficiency (186.0). The senior is expected to contend for the Heisman Trophy, and neither his success nor the rise of his team should come as any surprise in the 2007 season.

After all, Hawaii is the southernmost team in the country.
Source
 
crazedcav333 said:
This Ohio State team reminds me a lot of the 2002 National Championship team. Dominant defense, (Just switch Mike Doss for James Laurinaitis) playmaking CB (Jenkins for Gamble), big, fast D-Line (Gholston, Wilson, and co. for Will Smith and co.), big, fast, pound-right-through-you RB (Wells for Clarett), and an upstart QB who no one thinks can win the big one. (Assuming Boeckman starts over Henton for Krenzel).

Only downside I see is the WR's arent up to par as 2002, Krenzel has playing time, and even with Maurice Wells we aren't as deep at RB since Clarett had Ross behind him.
Hopefully Saine will be better than Ross, but who knows. Boeckman will be the key. I don't care how dominating your defense and starting RB are, at some point you have to put the ball in your QB's hands and ask him to win the game for you. In 2002, the Purdue game immediately comes to mind.

The schedule at least sets up nicely for a young team with a new starting QB. They will likely open up 8-0. If they grow up and gel in those games, who's to say they can't win out? It's not probable, sure, but it's certainly possible.
 
Style said:
Hopefully Saine will be better than Ross, but who knows. Boeckman will be the key. I don't care how dominating your defense and starting RB are, at some point you have to put the ball in your QB's hands and ask him to win the game for you. In 2002, the Purdue game immediately comes to mind.
The schedule at least sets up nicely for a young team with a new starting QB. They will likely open up 8-0. If they grow up and gel in those games, who's to say they can't win out? It's not probable, sure, but it's certainly possible.

HOLY BUCKEYE!!!

I bet more people picked Miami to take us apart than people who voted we would win this year. I tend to favor the first outcome.

I'm so excited about Henton (He's already been red shirted right?), but just can't see a Vick style QB playing for Tressel or at least being successful.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-15: "Cavs Survive and Advance"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:15: Cavs Survive and Advance
Top