• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Cavaliers need to emulate OKC & how they were built

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Shaq going to LA.
Kobe refusing to play anywhere but LA before the draft. Forced trade.
Corrupt Gasol trade by former Laker West that should have been vetoed.
Corrupt Garnett trade by former Celtic McHale that should have been vetoed.
James, Bosh tampering to Miami
Anthony forces way to NY
Williams forces way to Brooklyn
Paul forces way to LA
Howard to...

But at least Detroit did it. And of course SA with #1 pick HOF centers.
Dallas is a huge market but wanted to mention they followed the formula that you said that no one should do with older players- Kidd, Marion, Terry, etc. Admittedly they are all better than anyone LeBron ever had in Cle.

Wonder why Paul wanted out of NO.
Wonder why Anthony wanted out of Denver.
Wonder why Williams wanted out of Utah.
Wonder why Howard wants out of Orlando.
Wonder why Bosh and James wanted out of Cleveland Toronto.

Oh wait! That's right! Because their management SHIT THEMSELVES and couldn't get it done when they had control of these stars for years!

Are you seeing a pattern? How many guys have left championship caliber teams to go play in big markets? A couple? Is Durant trying to force his way out of OKC? No, because their team is young and getting better every year, and looks to be a legitimate title contender for the foreseeable future. It isn't clogged with old vets and bad moves by the management desperate to convince their star to stick around, they built the team the right way- and there are many ways to do so, as people keep pointing out. The important thing is you make good, quality moves and get a little lucky.

GOOD. MANAGEMENT. WINS.

Dallas is a huge market but wanted to mention they followed the formula that you said that no one should do with older players- Kidd, Marion, Terry, etc. Admittedly they are all better than anyone LeBron ever had in Cle.

Yes, but Dallas has Dirk, a top 10 player in the game and a megastar, which totally invalidates everything RikSmits is trying to say in that you don't need one of those guys. And yes, rofl, Dirk's cast was better than LeBron's.
 
Wonder why Paul wanted out of NO.
Wonder why Anthony wanted out of Denver.
Wonder why Williams wanted out of Utah.
Wonder why Howard wants out of Orlando.
Wonder why Bosh and James wanted out of Cleveland Toronto.

Oh wait! That's right! Because their management SHIT THEMSELVES and couldn't get it done when they had control of these stars for years!

Are you seeing a pattern? How many guys have left championship caliber teams to go play in big markets? A couple? Is Durant trying to force his way out of OKC? No, because their team is young and getting better every year, and looks to be a legitimate title contender for the foreseeable future. It isn't clogged with old vets and bad moves by the management desperate to convince their star to stick around, they built the team the right way- and there are many ways to do so, as people keep pointing out. The important thing is you make good, quality moves and get a little lucky.

GOOD. MANAGEMENT. WINS.



Yes, but Dallas has Dirk, a top 10 player in the game and a megastar, which totally invalidates everything RikSmits is trying to say in that you don't need one of those guys. And yes, rofl, Dirk's cast was better than LeBron's.

Yes back to back 60+ win teams with one of the youngest rosters in the league is a horribly managed team. Not to mention having an owner willing to spend every last cent to make the team a winner. Miami won how many last year as the greatest team ever? Great team though even with Boston and Orlando having devastating injuries making the East a joke.
So I think you are off base in putting that situation with the others.
Lets face it the Cavs would have been a 40 win team with everyone healthy last year. They got EXTREMELY lucky with all the "injuries"- lol at the Cavs making Mo sit so they could tank. Loved the random Hickson benchings too. Nice touch.
As for RikSmits Id be lying if I said I read more than the last couple of recent comments so I dont know what you are referring to. If he said you dont need a superstar then no I obviously dont agree with that.
 
I will say it's more about making smart choices with your draft picks no matter where you draft than it is making sure you pick high.

Which is no easy thing, either. Just gotta love the Bulls drafting record. Jerry Krause snags Micahel Jordan, Pippen, Grant, Armstrong, etc, via the draft and the Bulls go on a historic run.

Michael retires (again), and the Bulls are rewarded with a series of top-10 picks that they turn in to this:

Elton Brand
Marcus Fizer
Jamaal Crawford
Eddy Curry
Jay Williams
Kirk Hinrich
Ben Gordon
Tyrus Thomas
Joakim Noah

before winning the Rose lottery.

Were Krause and Paxson just incompetent?

One way to check for that is to look at who was taken next:

Steve Francis
Mike Miller
Jason Richardson
Mike Dunleavy
TJ Ford
Shaun Livingston
Adam Morrison /Shelden Williams (depending which pick you credit them with, or Aldridge if they'd just stayed put)
Spencer Hawes

Does anyone like that much better? Even if you grant them Aldridge? You can't even rule out their bad luck with Jay Williams as abnormal when they could have ended up with Shaun Livingston had they taken a pass on Ben Gordon. Of course what you're tempted to do is pretend that their GM should have been omniscient and selected the best players available.

And then they would have had something like this (at least based on career win shares):

Shawn Marion (9th)
Hedo Turkoglu (16th) or Michael Redd (43rd)
Tony Parker (28th)
Amare Stoudemire (9th)
David West (18th)
Andre Iguodala (9th)
LaMarcus Aldridge (2nd),

Now that team should win a lot of games, but can you guarantee they'd win a championship?

Scouting is a crap shoot. Player development on the other hand is something a team can control. Character, work ethic, and fit for a team are all things that can be evaluated. We shouldn't be surprised if the Cavs miss out on the best talent at their draft slot. That's inevitable, but Chris Grant's ability to evaluate those other areas will determine our success. If you feel there's a 50-50 chance that a talented player like Perry Jones III will turn in to the next Darius Miles, there's really no choice but to take a pass on him for someone who you feel sure will take his career seriously, care about his team, and work constantly to improve on both sides of the ball.

A wasted draft pick for a lottery team is basically a wasted season.
 
Yes, but Dallas has Dirk, a top 10 player in the game and a megastar, which totally invalidates everything RikSmits is trying to say in that you don't need one of those guys. And yes, rofl, Dirk's cast was better than LeBron's.

I think you're overblowing his position. He made it clear he's not saying a team should avoid drafting or developing a star player. Who in their right mind would turn down a superstar?

The point here is that Dallas never tanked to add guys around Dirk. Devin Harris was a top draft pick, but they got him by trading Jamison to the Wizards. He in turn got them Jason Kidd - which probably would have had all of us screaming at Ferry if he'd given up a good young PG for an old vet in decline who might have been able to sign on the cheap in '09/'10 when his $20m contract ran out.

Dallas was and is willing to take risks, and that's something that has often paid off for championship teams.
 
Yes, but Dallas has Dirk, a top 10 player in the game and a megastar, which totally invalidates everything RikSmits is trying to say in that you don't need one of those guys. And yes, rofl, Dirk's cast was better than LeBron's.

Perhaps you should read my posts a bit more carefully. I never said that you don't need a star; I said that it is very hard to get the star and keep the star that wins you championships.

The thing is, if you draft good players that have a willingness to work hard, learn, play together and play defense, you have a shot. A better shot than the one or two teams that get the superstar? Probably not. A better shot than the 20+ teams that don't get the megastar? I think, yes.
And the beauty of it is that one of these good players who fits the criteria above may be that superstar.
What I'm saying isn't excluding that possibility, it's just stating that you got to have a backup plan to just getting that superstar.
 
I think you're overblowing his position. He made it clear he's not saying a team should avoid drafting or developing a star player. Who in their right mind would turn down a superstar?

The point here is that Dallas never tanked to add guys around Dirk. Devin Harris was a top draft pick, but they got him by trading Jamison to the Wizards. He in turn got them Jason Kidd - which probably would have had all of us screaming at Ferry if he'd given up a good young PG for an old vet in decline who might have been able to sign on the cheap in '09/'10 when his $20m contract ran out.

Dallas was and is willing to take risks, and that's something that has often paid off for championship teams.

Sounds like we're back to talking about "models" or "templates" to win. I'm not going there. Draft great players. Put great role players around them. Stress defense, make savvy trades, draft well. Like I said, good management will get you where you need to be.

Perhaps you should read my posts a bit more carefully. I never said that you don't need a star; I said that it is very hard to get the star and keep the star that wins you championships.

It's very hard to win championships, period. Nobody said it was easy. It's something we have to accept. Your stars will stay on your team if you are building the right way. That's proven. So if the Cavs are building the right way, you have nothing to worry about, and if they aren't, you probably won't win anything anyways.

The thing is, if you draft good players that have a willingness to work hard, learn, play together and play defense, you have a shot. A better shot than the one or two teams that get the superstar? Probably not. A better shot than the 20+ teams that don't get the megastar? I think, yes.
And the beauty of it is that one of these good players who fits the criteria above may be that superstar.
What I'm saying isn't excluding that possibility, it's just stating that you got to have a backup plan to just getting that superstar.

So a few of these guys that you draft who are willing to work hard, learn, play defense together, etc...a few of them will need to be All Stars. Right? There are superstars who follow those guidelines. You just said so yourself. So you're basically arguing that we need to draft guys who work hard, are willing to learn and play defense as a team...I mean, no shit? I don't mean that to be snide. But, no shit?

I'm not saying championships are predicated on having a superstar. You can have multiple All Stars and a great team around them and get it done, too. That's fine with me. There's a ton of ways you can do it. Just get great players who work.
 
This is the first time I've seen this comparison/suggestion.

The following 49 Users say Thank you to Jigo_oi for this useful post.
Amherstcavsfan, Backstage, blank964, BlueSeats626, bman91, bob2the2nd, Damage, Distracted, Evancook, fghjk, Funny Man Rocco, Fursdon, guitarlifter, howler1313, Hydroponic3385, ice cream man, InGilbertWeTrust, johnnycake44022, JSS2306, KCOTT, Kevalier, kookoo, Lionheart, macbdog, Mike Manifesto, MoFloDeepintheQ , Mr. Glass, Noonan, palin99999, Pavlovic3Ball, pr26, Prime 1978, Pyro Kinesis, rabman_gold, RaptorFan, Reach, RealKingofCleve, Robert, RonG, SteelSmack, tedginnjr, The Man Called X, The Optomist, TheNewEra, theNorthCoastKid, tmackin07, Tornicade, warddj86, Warren G.




But why?

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/iYO2fAHQwN0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
:54
 
Last edited:
Wonder why Paul wanted out of NO.
Wonder why Anthony wanted out of Denver.
Wonder why Williams wanted out of Utah.
Wonder why Howard wants out of Orlando.
Wonder why Bosh and James wanted out of Cleveland Toronto.

Oh wait! That's right! Because their management SHIT THEMSELVES and couldn't get it done when they had control of these stars for years!

Are you seeing a pattern? How many guys have left championship caliber teams to go play in big markets? A couple? Is Durant trying to force his way out of OKC? No, because their team is young and getting better every year, and looks to be a legitimate title contender for the foreseeable future. It isn't clogged with old vets and bad moves by the management desperate to convince their star to stick around, they built the team the right way- and there are many ways to do so, as people keep pointing out. The important thing is you make good, quality moves and get a little lucky.

GOOD. MANAGEMENT. WINS.
It's funny that the Detroit example is scoffed at because of the "facts" that it was one championship in supposedly a very weak year.

When you look how many small market teams have managed to to win in the "OKC manner"in the last decades , it has only been San Antonio. The next small market team to win it was in 1979, Seattle.
 
It's funny that the Detroit example is scoffed at because of the "facts" that it was one championship in supposedly a very weak year.

When you look how many small market teams have managed to to win in the "OKC manner"in the last decades , it has only been San Antonio. The next small market team to win it was in 1979, Seattle.

Stop right there. We're done acting like there are "Detroit templates" and "OKC templates." MoFlo, Jon, and that other guy whose name escapes me pretty much hit the nail on the head with their posts. There are no predetermined models for success. And I'm saying if you have good management consistently, you will win eventually.

Everybody knows the Lakers and Celtics and Bulls have about 95% of the championships in the NBA. It's a star driven league and those are star driven markets. They are at a small advantage. A small market team with good management can be just as good as them, however. It's just that good management is a rare thing.
 
Yes back to back 60+ win teams with one of the youngest rosters in the league is a horribly managed team. Not to mention having an owner willing to spend every last cent to make the team a winner. Miami won how many last year as the greatest team ever? Great team though even with Boston and Orlando having devastating injuries making the East a joke.
So I think you are off base in putting that situation with the others.
Lets face it the Cavs would have been a 40 win team with everyone healthy last year. They got EXTREMELY lucky with all the "injuries"- lol at the Cavs making Mo sit so they could tank. Loved the random Hickson benchings too. Nice touch.
As for RikSmits Id be lying if I said I read more than the last couple of recent comments so I dont know what you are referring to. If he said you dont need a superstar then no I obviously dont agree with that.


Yea, we all saw how good those young players looked without Lebron. The only reason we were good to begin with was because of Lebron. Look at the 2010 season for instance. We lost Mo for 15 games. Guess what our record was in those games? 15-0. The very next game we lost Delonte for about a month with a broken hand. Started Gibson who hadn't been getting consistent playing time all season. Didn't skip a beat. Lost Shaq for 1/3 of the season. Didn't miss him. Whats the common denominator in the Cavs regular season wins? Lebron. I know most of you hate him, but the Cavs absolutely shit the the bed building a team around him. The Decision was awful and should have never happened, but he made the right decsion if wants the chance to play for multiple championships. If any of the Lebron era Cavs teams won the titlle, we would have been up there with 03 Spurs, 94 Rockets, and Rick Barry's Warriors for worst championship teams ever.
 
So you're basically arguing that we need to draft guys who work hard, are willing to learn and play defense as a team...I mean, no shit? I don't mean that to be snide. But, no shit?
You do mean to be snide, and you have this condescending tone in which you try to make your point, which is your choice, but a pity.

So I won't stop "right there". I can express my opinion just like you can.

But yeah, no shit. Some teams pick BSA (Best Scorer Available) and don't pay much attention to work ethic, interest in team play and hard work. Poster boys for those picks were guys like Derek Coleman, Olowokandi, Tim Thomas and even guys like Iverson.

And now I'll stop. Right here.
 
Yes back to back 60+ win teams with one of the youngest rosters in the league is a horribly managed team. Not to mention having an owner willing to spend every last cent to make the team a winner. Miami won how many last year as the greatest team ever? Great team though even with Boston and Orlando having devastating injuries making the East a joke.
So I think you are off base in putting that situation with the others.
Lets face it the Cavs would have been a 40 win team with everyone healthy last year. They got EXTREMELY lucky with all the "injuries"- lol at the Cavs making Mo sit so they could tank. Loved the random Hickson benchings too. Nice touch.
As for RikSmits Id be lying if I said I read more than the last couple of recent comments so I dont know what you are referring to. If he said you dont need a superstar then no I obviously dont agree with that.

Youngest teams in the league?!

Your starting big men were combined age of about 100 years old.

Your starting 2 guard was in his 30s.

All of them were marginal talents at this point in their career.

I don't know if this is a joke post or what. A bunch of crappy players on our bench who happened to be young don't make it a well managed team. The management was not good. Yes, LeBron in part made them look bad and he deserves a lot of the blame with his refusal to commit, but come on. Aren't you glad we have Antawn Jamison on this roster right now?! Me too!
 
You do mean to be snide, and you have this condescending tone in which you try to make your point, which is your choice, but a pity.

So I won't stop "right there". I can express my opinion just like you can.

But yeah, no shit. Some teams pick BSA (Best Scorer Available) and don't pay much attention to work ethic, interest in team play and hard work. Poster boys for those picks were guys like Derek Coleman, Olowokandi, Tim Thomas and even guys like Iverson.

And now I'll stop. Right here.

Don't tell me what I mean to do.

You're basically stating the horribly obvious by saying we need to draft good players who play defense and are willing to learn and work together. Sorry for pointing that out- I'm sorry if that offends you, but it's true. Very obvious statement. Somehow, I don't think that was your only point, and I still feel like you believe you can win in this league without multiple All Stars or a superstar or two, but hey...
 
You do mean to be snide, and you have this condescending tone in which you try to make your point, which is your choice, but a pity.

So I won't stop "right there". I can express my opinion just like you can.

But yeah, no shit. Some teams pick BSA (Best Scorer Available) and don't pay much attention to work ethic, interest in team play and hard work. Poster boys for those picks were guys like Derek Coleman, Olowokandi, Tim Thomas and even guys like Iverson.

And now I'll stop. Right here.

Derrick Coleman and Allen Iverson were by far the consensus best players available in their respective drafts.
 
Wonder why Paul wanted out of NO.
Wonder why Anthony wanted out of Denver.
Wonder why Williams wanted out of Utah.
Wonder why Howard wants out of Orlando.
Wonder why Bosh and James wanted out of Cleveland Toronto.

Oh wait! That's right! Because their management SHIT THEMSELVES and couldn't get it done when they had control of these stars for years!

Are you seeing a pattern? How many guys have left championship caliber teams to go play in big markets? A couple? Is Durant trying to force his way out of OKC? No, because their team is young and getting better every year, and looks to be a legitimate title contender for the foreseeable future. It isn't clogged with old vets and bad moves by the management desperate to convince their star to stick around, they built the team the right way- and there are many ways to do so, as people keep pointing out. The important thing is you make good, quality moves and get a little lucky.

GOOD. MANAGEMENT. WINS.



Yes, but Dallas has Dirk, a top 10 player in the game and a megastar, which totally invalidates everything RikSmits is trying to say in that you don't need one of those guys. And yes, rofl, Dirk's cast was better than LeBron's.

We agree on the "model" fallacy that is the premise of this thread, but this post is revisionist history at it's finest. The difference between what the Thunder are doing and what the Cavs did with Lebron, and only time will tell if there is any at all as far as results are concerned, stems entirely from the moves made at or around the time the superstar was obtained. The Thunder's next draft yielded Westbrook and diamond in the rough Ibaka, and the draft after got them Harden, who finally started to look like a player last season. The Cavs lost their diamond in the rough Boozer after lebron's first season, took "the most ready to compete now" SF the next draft in Jackson (because Lebron had just moved from PG to SG in their minds at that point), proceeded to trade 1sts like they was candy trying to find a light skinned SG when they finally had the "revelation" that Lebron was a SF, then Ferry in his first off-season wanted to save his pants' pockets from getting burned through entirely and threw money at 2 flashes in the pan and an old glue (bodied) PF.

When you go on to say "for years" in reference to the Cavs FO, though, you're way off base. Ferry found his stride quickly and proceeded to put together a team to fit lebron's game exclusively and without fear of spending too much of daddy warbucks' green. With perpetually low picks and bad assets, Ferry assembled a defensively sound team for his defensive minded coach, along with very good spot shooters to spread the floor for his star. Every problem that arose each year was addressed the next, through smart trades and lots of spending. Mo and West looked great in the backcourt together, Shaq was brought in solely to get us past the Magic, and Jamison seemed like the floor-spacer we needed to win before lebron revealed his long-since hatched plan to suck dick for a living.

Did it work? No. But lebron had as much to do with that as anybody. Lebron's team was in excellent shape to remain a contender for years when he left, and not simply because he was so good. The shitty team left behind didn't prove he was right; it proved that every single personnel decision was made to revolve around his game, obviously failing when the centerpiece left.

Dirk's cast is clearly better?? Are you sure?? He gave them more time to figure it out and didn't hint at abandoning them every other day like a high school girlfriend wanting to see her poor boyfriend squirm. And this championship cast was composed almost exclusively of the EXACT type of players the Cavs assembled before shithead left; pre-championship Terry was basically current Mo Williams, give or take, Kidd was a past-his-prime afterthought when he first got there, Marion was the same, only he was absolutely given away as a guy who only made his money playing alongside Nash for Mike D, the "missing piece" Chandler was a guy that would have been traded by his previous team earlier for peanuts, but for his failed physical, and who else? JJ Barea? Was he the piece that kept Dirk around? Beaubois? Stevenson, Haywood, and Butler, those three perpetual winners that Dirk needed to get to the promised land? Or maybe Peja is the guy that pushed their roster over the top when compared to Lebron's Cavs.

Please. Saying that that star-studded team kept Dirk around, using it as an example of the right way of building a team around a star, specifically in comparison to what the cavs did with lbj, is so ironic that I need a word that means ironic more than the actual word "ironic" does. You know the real difference between the Dirk Mavs and the LBJ Cavs?

Dirk > Lebron
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top