Garoppolo's market value hasn't changed at all, if a team is desperate enough to give the Pats a 2nd rounder he'll be traded.
#12 and "whatever else they want" is a mind-numbingly bad overpay.
#12 and "whatever else they want" is a mind-numbingly bad overpay.
Sure it is.. To you.
To me it's a fair price to pay for a guy I believe to be a FQB.
Off by a round, and at least five teams are without question desperate for a quarterback. I'm going to go ahead and suggest that of the NFL world outside of three posters on RCF and a handful of Browns fans are saying the same market value... it's time to explore outside of the bubble.
How can "whatever else they want" be a "fair price"??
Sure it is.. To you.
To me it's a fair price to pay for a guy I believe to be a FQB.
EDIT: Also, if you don't think giving up a mid-first round pick and maybe a 4th or conditional pick to solve our QB problem that's lasted 17 years now then you really must be content to continue to head down the same franchise trajectory we've been on for those 17 years.
Sure it is.. To you.
To me it's a fair price to pay for a guy I believe to be a FQB.
EDIT: Also, if you don't think giving up a mid-first round pick and maybe a 4th or conditional pick to solve our QB problem that's lasted 17 years now then you really must be content to continue to head down the same franchise trajectory we've been on for those 17 years.
Isnt that his point. That its ridiculous give the pats whatever they want, just because they are asking for it.How can "whatever else they want" be a "fair price"??
Is that a joke? Garoppolo's thrown 63 passes as a starter, that's no where close enough to be convinced he's a franchise quarterback.
For Christ sakes, the Redskins have seen Cousins attempt 1500+ passes with a couple above-average seasons and there's still people in that front office not convinced he's a franchise guy.
Absolutely ridiculous to even mention Garoppolo as a FQB right now.
Based on that statement it would be absolutely pointless to spend any high draft capital on a QB because "who knows" if they'll be an FQB there's not enough tape on them playing in the NFL yet.
This board is so delusional if everyone thinks the Patriots are just going to let us come in and set a price point for a player they clearly really like.
Really? But it's completely okay to mention a QB coming right out of college as an FQB? Who's never thrown a pass in the NFL?
Based on that statement it would be absolutely pointless to spend any high draft capital on a QB because "who knows" if they'll be an FQB there's not enough tape on them playing in the NFL yet..
This board is so delusional if everyone thinks the Patriots are just going to let us come in and set a price point for a player they clearly really like. A player who is also the best option at the position this entire off-season almost unquestionably. I mean tuned in NFL people are saying the same things about Jimmy that have been stated here for quite a while now.
No, that's not true at all. First, neither Garrapolo nor anyone coming right out of the college is a "franchise QB". Some guys have demonstrated, to varying degrees, the potential to be one, but it's not a certainty for any of them. So when you say "Garrapolo is an FQB", no he isn't. That would be like calling Garrett an "All-Pro defensive end". He's not. Not yet, anyway. Value is based on how likely you believe it is that someone will be a FQB.
Second, the concern with Garrapolo is that he's only 63 passes away from being the guy whom the entire NFL passed on in the first round, which occurred after watching him throw more than 1500 passes in college. So the very legitimate question is this -- are 63 passes while playing for the best team in football enough to completely erase what was seen by the prior 1500+? That's why people are skeptical.
In contrast, a guy like Luck was considered the consensus No.1 overall pick based on the more than 1000 passes he threw in college. There was a much more extended period of high performance against high-level competition than we've had the opportunity to see with Garrapolo.
I don't think there is a single person here who thinks that the Browns alone determine the price point. It's the entire league that does that. And if the Pats don't want to sell him, they won't. They can franchise him next year if they really want to keep him that badly.
You can be skeptical all you want. I'm just telling you what my eyes see when it comes to what I've watched with Garrappolo, as well as a lot of well tuned people across the NFL. There is more tape than just the 63 passes, like stated earlier he's taken a lot of pre-season reps and has looked very strong then as well. You can clearly see he has the ability to get through reads quickly and process information on the field, an attribute that's not found often.
At some point the Browns are going to have to take a chance on a QB they think can be a franchise changing guy. When the hell is it? Are we supposed to sit here and wait for the next Luck-level prospect and just hope we've made no improvement since now so we're in a position to draft him, or that the team at the top of the draft already has a FQB so we can use our draft capital to try and trade up for him?
Garrappolo is widely considered the best QB available this off-season despite his small sample size, and giving up the 12th pick plus a 4th rounder doesn't really seem like that steep of a price for me.