Clearly there was no need to say that people who don't like the trade are dumbasses. That was clearly uncalled for and nobody should be making any such ridiculous statements.
However, I think you can fairly judge the trade now.
Again, if trades made by championship teams were solely based on the end result, there'd be a crapload of "bad trades" in the NBA every year. What's more important is that it improves our chances of winning said championship. Things happen every year that positively or negatively effect if a team wins a championship that aren't based on a trade that team may make to improve their chances.
For example, looking back on the 2014-2015 season, we lost in the Finals, but would you say the JR/Shump trade was a bad trade? Of course not.
Unless you're that enamored with a 1st round pick or have proof that Dunleavy & that pick could've netted us something that improves our chances greater than Korver does, I don't see how, even if we don't end up winning it all, you can look back and say this was a bad trade.
There are people who think that pick could have been used on someone who, they feel, could have helped the team more. Jmoney has brought up sefolosha.
As for me, I was an advocate for the deal but I will say, unequivocally, if we don't win this year and we then decide to not keep Korver due to the tax, the trade will have been a mistake. I hope very much that we will keep him, but I'm not going to guarantee such a thing after we decided to let Delly go.
Kyle Korver is such a perfect piece next to LeBron and Kyrie, it's not even funny.There are people who think that pick could have been used on someone who, they feel, could have helped the team more. Jmoney has brought up sefolosha.
As for me, I was an advocate for the deal but I will say, unequivocally, if we don't win this year and we then decide to not keep Korver due to the tax, the trade will have been a mistake. I hope very much that we will keep him, but I'm not going to guarantee such a thing after we decided to let Delly go.
I know you said you're only "a little drunk" but you may be the only drunk dude I know who has used words like "nomenclature" and "accoutrements"
Regardless of Korver's actual shooting in the finals, his mere presence drastically opens up our offense.
That's why it was a good trade regardless, because he gives us a better chance to win than Dunleavy, no matter what.
Judging a trade by only if the Cavs win the title is ridiculous
It's not a coincidence that most of that crowd is the same ones hating on DWill. Just trying to seem smarter than everyone else is all it is. And Griffin repeatedly proves his worth.
Judging a trade by only if the Cavs win the title is ridiculous
You judge a trade by it's impact and how they perform. Right now Korver is providing much needed shooting while Love and JR are out which doesn't put as much pressure on Kyrie and LeBron to score.I dont agree.
I once said i would trade my own mother to win a championship. I was 43 years old at the time and never had one in my entire life of rooting for 3 major Cleveland teams.
Since I didnt have to trade my Mother, i would now trade her for a repeat.
Trades for the Cavs are all about maximizing the window and winning a championship. If you are judging the trades by the end results, what do you judge them by? How many guys from GQ we get on the team?
Korver has a TS of .699 with the Cavs... That is beyond elite and into god like territory. He's comfortably the best shooter this team has ever had and quite possibly the leagues best shooter in the greatest shooting era in history. The guy is shooting over 50 % from three with an absurd 69% of his field goals coming from three.
I feel like the team has given him the green light to bomb away from anywhere beyond three and he is taking advantage and just destroying teams.