You could, but again, Dion is going to have a higher trade value because of his contract situation and his upside. Basically the series of moves I'm talking about "trades" cap space and Dion's potential for immediate production. That's obviously a "trade" that must be done very carefully or we could lose out and end up with a lower ceiling as a team. But we've heard multiple times that the Cavs' front office wants to go all-in this offseason, and this is how you do it, for better or for worse.
You can't.
Your Waiters bias, while deserved, is overwhelmingly evident.
Bias? Waiters didn't have a down year. We don't know what to expect from Hayward. Waiters is also not $15M playing at the wing which we seem to already have covered.
I like it more than a max for Larry Hughes, so that's a thing
Hayward will never have a website like this: http://heylarryhughespleasestoptakingsomanybadshots.com/
Do you think Larry Hughes is laughing?
Hell yes. He gets to play a game for a living and is paid tens of millions of dollars in the process. He’s living the dream. Meanwhile, you’re reading my crappy blog. I’d say he’s laughing at both of us.
Hayward is more proven than Dion imo.
Where do you project Hayward's ceiling to be in 4 years? Box score wise per 36 assuming he's the second option?
What was Utah's reasoning for not offering him an extension last offseason?
Safari on life support.