Damage
fuckface
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2007
- Messages
- 13,665
- Reaction score
- 21,875
- Points
- 135
Phenom? I hope you don't use that term lightly...
Don't use it nearly as much as your "the sky is falling" posts.
Phenom? I hope you don't use that term lightly...
On potential alone, Abner Abreu and Carlos Rivero should be ranked higher. Abreu had a terrible year in the minors but the kid is as raw as they come. His upside is, no joke, Alfonso Soriano. Rivero is a phenom as well, so much so that the Tribe protected him on the 40 man roster. You don't see that too often.
Don't use it nearly as much as your "the sky is falling" posts.
Oh yeah? Asking you if you are using the term "phenom" lightly to describe Carlos Rivero is saying the sky is falling? It was a question, not making fun of you for saying it. Be a douche more, Damage.
I think you're confusing the two.
Abreu was fantastic this season in the minors, but ended up injured and missed the rest of the season.
He certainly is talented, but he also swings at everything which leads to some really bad K/BB numbers. His raw power might be the best in the organization next to Weglarz, but he has a LONG way to go before he can be considered a highly rated prospect IMO.
Rivero was the one who had the horrible year, hitting .247/.317/.342/.659 with a miserably 16 percent line drive rate at AA Akron. His numbers were marred by a terrible first half:
April - .222
May - .211
June - .195
He got better as the season went along:
July - .269
August - .292
Sept. - .309
But really didn't show any power potential that people (myself included) saw prior to this season. He's not very rangy at short, but his arm certainly helps...as the dude has an absolute fucking cannon.
That said, he's going to start out at Akron again this season and repeating a level is not a very good thing if you're looking to be names a top prospect.
I still think Rivero has the highest ceiling of any infielder in the Indians system (Lonnie C included), but this is certainly a make or break year for him from a prospect perspective.
Wasn't citing this thread as an example, but you're constantly whining or bitching about impending doom. How am I being a "douche"?
Then why the fuck would you say it if it isn't in this thread? This is your problem, Damage. If you have a problem with me cracking jokes about World Series tickets, fine, it's how I deal with my bitter attitude towards the Cleveland Indians. Feel free to disagree with me when I say something like that. When I say something pertinent, though, the least you can do is own the fuck up and respond normally to it.
Sorry for the douche comment, you aren't a douche, but it was a douche move.
Damn dude, did your meth lab explode? Take a vic-melatonin cocktail and call it an evening. Why are you so worked up? You know me, I bust balls.
The only negative thing I can really say about you is that you don't look at the big picture. It sucks that the Indians have to trade away talent every other year, but it's the nature of the business. Just be thankful we have a brilliant General Manager who knows how to manage a small market team amidst the predators. I hate it, you hate it, we all hate it. But what can you do except root for the jerseys and not the players. That's what I do. Makes it much better.
Yeah, shit is a little rough today, but no, my meth lab is still cooking. But that's my business...I know you bust balls, I guess I just didn't take it that way. Back to the Indians:
I do look at the big picture, I just despise that picture so much and am so bitter over it that it comes out in most of the things I say. I love the Browns and Cavs but the Indians were my first love and seeing them stuck in such a hopeless system...well, quite frankly, I don't know how you guys keep interest in the team. I'm trying to. Say what you want about a brilliant GM but what has it gotten us? One playoff run in like 8 years...that's a long time, bro.
Not trying to be a downer which is why I will sometimes post real, legit comments about the Indians. I just don't see how we're supposed to compete in this system and yet so many people still think the system is fine (not here, just in general).
I know you just have to accept it, but I'm stubborn. It grinds my gears.
Which is precisely why I like to follow minor league players. These guys will be in the system 5-10 years and you get to see them progress from the bottom to the top. The only teams that are happy with baseball are located in NY, Chicago, Boston, LA and Texas.
I get a little too optimistic with my evaluations of our minor league players but we are extremely stacked with talent. Despite the current state of our team, Shapiro has managed to put together one of the best farm systems in all of baseball. If some of our top guys pan out and stay healthy, it could easily be the best. I mean, Rivero and Abreu would be in the top 10 for some systems.
I think you're confusing the two.
Abreu was fantastic this season in the minors, but ended up injured and missed the rest of the season.
He certainly is talented, but he also swings at everything which leads to some really bad K/BB numbers. His raw power might be the best in the organization next to Weglarz, but he has a LONG way to go before he can be considered a highly rated prospect IMO.
Rivero was the one who had the horrible year, hitting .247/.317/.342/.659 with a miserably 16 percent line drive rate at AA Akron. His numbers were marred by a terrible first half:
April - .222
May - .211
June - .195
He got better as the season went along:
July - .269
August - .292
Sept. - .309
But really didn't show any power potential that people (myself included) saw prior to this season. He's not very rangy at short, but his arm certainly helps...as the dude has an absolute fucking cannon.
That said, he's going to start out at Akron again this season and repeating a level is not a very good thing if you're looking to be names a top prospect.
I still think Rivero has the highest ceiling of any infielder in the Indians system (Lonnie C included), but this is certainly a make or break year for him from a prospect perspective.