- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 18,410
- Reaction score
- 27,763
- Points
- 135
Yeah, Love leaving would be a killer, I agree, but it still makes 0 sense for me that he would. I just don't see how someone who wanted the max and a chance to win will pass that up just to go put up better numbers and win less while getting paid less.
As for the bolded, this has rarely happened lately until the San Antonio game, which I thought was reported that his back was acting up. I mean, just watching the game you could tell he was off...the dude was on one knee during some free throw attempts at one point in the 2nd half. I don't think I've ever seen that in an NBA game.
And we will always be staring down the barrel of a gun. We're Cleveland, the media will try to force out star players all the time. This has been happening all of my life with the Indians and the Cavs. Belle, Ramirez, Thome, Sabathia, Lee, LeBron, Kyrie, and now Love. We'll deal with it again in a few years when Kyrie's contract is up too, guarantee it. Just the way it is.
This post is on point. No two ways about it.
Makes zero sense for Love to leave. He plays on a winning team for the first time, and they can pay him more money than anyone else. He was upset with Minnesota because they didn't pay him what he was worth and they weren't winning. Both of those problems are solved here, albeit at the cost of some suffering production because of the fact he plays with the best player in the world and probably the best young guard (22 years old!) in the game.
With the rise of things like social media and viral marketing, market size is hardly a compelling argument anymore. You can get just as much exposure playing in Cleveland as you could playing in New York or Los Angeles. The only people who disagree are the Lakers and Knicks fans who are desperately clinging to the hope that their favorite franchises will be attracting top tier free agents this summer.
I think he's handled it publicly about as well as he could have to this point. Not much complaining. He himself said that winning makes it a lot easier to deal with having a down season in the production department, and the funny thing is that he's still averaging 17/10 as a third option, one of only a select few players (I think 10, but it might be even less) in the league to be averaging those numbers. If he was making one more three per game, we likely wouldn't even be having discussions about his production, because let's face it, who in their right mind is going to bitch about their third option averaging 20/10?
He has clearly sacrificed the most out of everyone when it comes to changing the way he plays the game. He has grown dramatically on the defensive end of the floor and he is playing a role on offense that, while not tailored to the way he plays the game most effectively, is working well when combined with the other big scoring elements on the team. It was evident how much they missed him on Monday - without him on the floor, the other team's bigs can clog the paint more, giving guys like LeBron and Irving less flexibility to finish at the rim. How many blown/blocked layups did we see that night? How many possessions ended with LeBron or Irving on their asses after a failed layup attempt?
For a guy that many criticized as a "me-first" and "empty stats" player during his time in Minnesota, and one who is having a down year (by his standards) in the production department, that's pretty damned impressive. He's given up a lot in his game to make it work, but the way he truly impacts the floor is only going to show up on the statlines for other players on the team.