There's no way i'd take Amare [or any league average player] over Kobe in a clutch situation, even if they did have similar numbers.
if for no other reason, because Kobe would be ten times as likely to get a call as any other player.
There's no way i'd take Amare [or any league average player] over Kobe in a clutch situation, even if they did have similar numbers.
This is a really fair point. I think LeBron is leagues better than Kobe; but, Kobe is still top-twenty all-time. Also, not sure why "Kobe didn't contribute anything unique." He literally has a generation of guys who talk about emulating him, Kyrie, Westbrook, and Harden chief among them.
LeBron's my favorite, and frankly, in the convo for GOAT... But some of the Kobe talk is straight-up disrespect.
I agree with this entire post. The only thing I'd add is I think that 2002 Lakers team needed Kobe, especially against the Kings. Not sure they win that series with Michael Finley. Otherwise I completely agree with your points.Kobe deserves a lot of credit for his tremendous work ethic and for absolutely maximizing his talent. He was a great two-way player and even though he wasn't God's gift to teammates was and is a role model for his approach to the game. He's definitely top-20 all-time. But I don't think he belongs in the pantheon of generational players like LeBron, Duncan, Shaq, Hakeem and MJ.
Also- and I'll acknowledge this is probably unfair to Kobe- I think those early-2000's Laker teams might've been capable of winning titles even had you substituted Kobe for, say, Michael Finley. As superb as Kobe was Shaq was absolutely the alpha and omega for those teams, no question.
Kobe deserves a lot of credit for his tremendous work ethic and for absolutely maximizing his talent. He was a great two-way player and even though he wasn't God's gift to teammates was and is a role model for his approach to the game. He's definitely top-20 all-time. But I don't think he belongs in the pantheon of generational players like LeBron, Duncan, Shaq, Hakeem and MJ.
Also- and I'll acknowledge this is probably unfair to Kobe- I think those early-2000's Laker teams might've been capable of winning titles even had you substituted Kobe for, say, Michael Finley. As superb as Kobe was Shaq was absolutely the alpha and omega for those teams, no question.
Kobe played like a role player in the first FinalsThats the most absurd thing I ever read
I hate how routine that this has become for him that a lot of people, especially in the national media, stop appreciating what this man has been able to accomplish.He basically swept the Pacers by himself.
Lebron from the outset was clearly focused on making this series a playoff duel between him and Paul George.He basically swept the Pacers by himself.