Man Executes Two Teen Intruders

[Mac]

You're not for all felons deserving to die. Just...if you get executed during the commission of a felony, it's tough luck and the person shouldn't be charged.

Right?

Yeah, your opinion really adds up. Hardass confirmed.

You sound stupid....

You are getting two things mixed up, so apparently your comprehension level is below average.

If you break into my home, I am within my legal right to react with deadly force. It doesn't matter what threat the person poses, me squeezing the trigger and killing somebody is not being a hard ass, it's protecting my home at the level I see to end a threat.

That's me.

I am not going to follow the same route as this guy and give them a good clean finishing shot to make sure the deed is done. However, with that being said, I am still never going to vote guilty for any charge brought against this man if I were on the jury.

 

[Mac]

Then you'd be in jail, dude.

Use of deadly force if your life is being threatened, to prevent bodily harm. Was this guys life being threatened after he killed the boy? No. Was this guys life being threatened after he maimed the female? No. Were the perps armed? No. It would have been different if one of the perps had a gun and/or aimed it at the homeowner.

So while he had every right to defend his house, the final gun shot was not justifiable homicide. In some instances, killing an unarmed burglar will get you life in prison. This guy was a gun nut - he should have known the laws.

He deserves the chair.

Wrong.

As bigmar pointed out, not in Ohio. You do not have to be threatened with a weapon, or have your life in danger, to protect your home. It doesn't matter what the person has or doesn't have upon entering the home, if they are there breaking into your home, you can use deadly force. Not saying that this guy's actions at the end are justified by law at all...

 

[KI4MVP]

there is a huge difference between being able to use deadly force to defend your home and continuing to use deadly force after your home has already been defended. There was no remaining threat to his home when he made that final shot. The intent of the law was so homeowners wouldn't get prosecuted if an intruder happens to die if a homeowner shoots them. It was never intended to give the homeowner the right to flat out execute people.

 

[Tlyons]

I believe Texas is or was the only state where the threat doesn't matter. You break into someone's home, they can shoot you no matter the specific threat.

 

[Chris]

You sound stupid....

You are getting two things mixed up, so apparently your comprehension level is below average.

If you break into my home, I am within my legal right to react with deadly force. It doesn't matter what threat the person poses, me squeezing the trigger and killing somebody is not being a hard ass, it's protecting my home at the level I see to end a threat.

That's me.

I am not going to follow the same route as this guy and give them a good clean finishing shot to make sure the deed is done. However, with that being said, I am still never going to vote guilty for any charge brought against this man if I were on the jury.

In one breath you claim you're not defending him, at the same time you say you would never convict this murderer of any charge.

Yet I am the one who sounds stupid? This is the second post where I have called out your contradictory stances. Choose a side and stick with it. Either the guy is a murderer and you should charge him as such, or you are pro-execution style murders in peoples' basements if the victims are committing a felony. Which is it? You have a lot of nerve discussing comprehension levels when you can't even stick to your story here.

 

[Tlyons]

Why can't all home invaders be like this...



[video=youtube;C5UZ_cYTTis]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5UZ_cYTTis[/video]

 

[Lee]

the actions of the guy keeps being defended, but isn't it a bit troubling that he never called the police? He didn't call them thursday, he didn't call them friday. He hid the bodies. He didn't tell the police what happened until

Not many here defending the guy, except life in prison vs insanity plea vs hot shot.

 

[Lee]

I believe Texas is or was the only state where the threat doesn't matter. You break into someone's home, they can shoot you no matter the specific threat.

Even in Texas the guy went beyond the scope of the law. I still think he clearly isnt capable of knowing right from wrong.

 

[The Oi]

I stand firm on my stance that regardless of the guy's guilt, society is better off without the two teenagers.

 

[The Voice]

I stand firm on my stance that regardless of the guy's guilt, society is better off without the two teenagers.

I disagree, the chick could have worked in the porn industry for many years.

Looks like her facebook page was gutted:

 

[Shakalu M.D.]

I stand firm on my stance that regardless of the guy's guilt, society is better off without the two teenagers.

Really? They were just kids, kids make mistakes. I know you and I have never done anything like this, but who's to say they couldn't have turned things around? It seems to me that the driving force here was a drug problem, it's not unheard of that they could have cleaned themselves up and become productive members of society.

Yes it's their own fault that they ended up dead, they shouldn't have broken into that guy's house. However I don't think theft and breaking and entering is worthy of the death penalty.

 

[Chris]

Yeah, I just don't understand that stance, Jigo. I really don't.

 

[Surge]

Yes it's their own fault that they ended up dead, they shouldn't have broken into that guy's house. However I don't think theft and breaking and entering is worthy of the death penalty.

So what if both of the first shots to each intruder were death shots? You'd still be saying that?

So if I break into your house, I'm assured to walk out alive? Not at my house. Not if I have a breath in my body.

His mistake was the period of time between first shots and the "finishing" shots. Had he just emptied his clip into the both of them (or killed them with 1 shot each) and then called the police right away, he's good and no one finds out the magnitude of his mental illness.

 

[Scrote Squad]

I was taught in my concealed carry class to yell STOP! I GOT A GUN! - As it was pointed at your face/chest (and we actually did this while we were shooting at the targets).

Your teacher is the one who should be in jail. For murdering the English language.

 

[Shakalu M.D.]

So what if both of the first shots to each intruder were death shots? You'd still be saying that?

So if I break into your house, I'm assured to walk out alive? Not at my house. Not if I have a breath in my body.

His mistake was the period of time between first shots and the "finishing" shots. Had he just emptied his clip into the both of them (or killed them with 1 shot each) and then called the police right away, he's good and no one finds out the magnitude of his mental illness.

First off, I don't own a gun so yeah you'd probably leave alive.

But no, I'm wouldn't say that if the first shots were death shots. Although I'm of the opinion that he should have warned them and given them a chance to surrender. Still, even if he didn't and just shot them and they happened to die, that's different. There's a reason I said I don't think breaking and entering/theft is worthy of the death penalty. He executed these kids.