Matthew Dellavedova

[benfti]

 

[benfti]

does anyone need a translation?

 

[mvp25]

I know Delly won't change a single thing about the way he goes all out, "reckless" or not.
Hopefully Delly will create a "track record" of pissing on his opponents in series clinching wins after failed character assasination attempts.

 

[Man Called X]

I sadly understand Aussies better than I do half of 'Murica.

 

[Adam]

I dont get this whole 'now im going to set hard screens' crap. Its a screen it should be set rock solid everytime anyway. why would you go up and think 'i like this dude from the other team so im going to set a weak screen and negate my physical effort in the first place'

 

[DrunkenBuckeye]

I'm pissed about this Delly is dirty narrative because of the impact on finals officiating. This is planting seeds in the officials minds. Usually its a coach like Phil Jackson but this is media driven. Curry was already going to get every 50\50 call against Delly. Delly has already been getting no respect from NBA officiating. I remember at least 3 times when Delly was moving straight back with his hands straight up and called for a foul after the offensive player Initiated contact. One play Delly was standing to the side with his hands straight up and the offensive player threw his elbow into Delly's head. They called a foul on Delly.

I worry this bullshit narrative will only make the terrible officiating worse.

 

[Paul]

Maybe Delly got some tricks from this guy:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q79hZ3v8RiE

 

[thunder_down_under]

Am I allowed to take personal offense to this?

I do love how the following sentence after asking "can he speak English?" Is "I probably wouldn't say nothing."

That was amusing.

I'm surprised the University of Missouri still counts him as an alum

 

[MirORich]

Maybe Delly got some tricks from this guy:

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q79hZ3v8RiE

"It's always been confusing to me as to what rule in the book tells you that a guard can't set a screen on a big guy.....The old saying is little guys don't belong in the paint. Well, they probably don't if they're afraid. But if they're not afraid, they belong anywhere they want to be."

Yep, pretty sure Sloan would love Delly.

 

[cavsLTU]

cmon Delly enough is enough

 

[Joe Henderson]

I'm just making the point that all the Hawks players complaining about Delly having a 'history' and a 'reputation' can shove it up their ass. There is no history on Delly. They probably didn't even know his name up until two weeks ago

It's incredible to me that they are getting away with this bullshit, that nobody is calling them out for it.

Essentially, they are trying to justify Horford's malicious, premeditated, excessive and unnecessary action, or at least trying to lessen its relative gravity.

And it worked -- no suspension.

But in the process, they are vilifying Dellavedova to make it seem okay to elbow him. They are almost dehumanizing him and are certainly using every possible angle to undermine him as a player.

They are doing this with no regard whatsoever to other consequences, such as destroying a young kid's career for no good reason.

I'm not sure if this is instinctive, or if they are getting some sinister PR/legal advice in terms of their communication, but if there's anything really dirty about this story, it's this.

It's the NBA equivalent of political negative campaigning -- paint your adversary in the worst possible light, so your actions won't look as bad and you get a license to tear the "bad guy" apart.

I find it sickening that this popped up in the NBA and a bit worrying that there isn't much pushback.

 

[Ajay]

Dunno if it's been posted here yet but this is a thing.

View: https://soundcloud.com/itszebramusic/hustle-like-delly-prod-mizzery

 

[Cratylus]

What did I just listen to??

 

[No Regard]

It's incredible to me that they are getting away with this bullshit, that nobody is calling them out for it.

Essentially, they are trying to justify Horford's malicious, premeditated, excessive and unnecessary action, or at least trying to lessen its relative gravity.

And it worked -- no suspension.

But in the process, they are vilifying Dellavedova to make it seem okay to elbow him. They are almost dehumanizing him and are certainly using every possible angle to undermine him as a player.

They are doing this with no regard whatsoever to other consequences, such as destroying a young kid's career for no good reason.

I'm not sure if this is instinctive, or if they are getting some sinister PR/legal advice in terms of their communication, but if there's anything really dirty about this story, it's this.

It's the NBA equivalent of political negative campaigning -- paint your adversary in the worst possible light, so your actions won't look as bad and you get a license to tear the "bad guy" apart.

I find it sickening that this popped up in the NBA and a bit worrying that there isn't much pushback.

Great post. And I share you worries.

It seems to me that these media guys don't understand the insane power they posses. Millions of people are listening to them, and sadly but truly, most of them won't check the facts, which obviously speak in favor of Delly's innocence.

It's scary how they are pissing on a young man's reputation. This is something that will struggle to go away for a long time I'm sure. It is much easier to inflict harm than to undo the damage done. Especially when it would be necessary for the harmers to 1) back down from their stance and 2) apologize. There is too much personal pride involved for that to happen.

A weaker person could be scarred for life, and I mean, Delly is obviously a tough guy, but everyone has a breaking point. I just hope, and I'm sure, that he'll get plenty of support from his team. But it's hard for anyone to suddenly be the center of attention, especially when the attention is almost exclusively negative and harmful.

The following is an excerpt from SPJ Code of Ethics (SPJ = Society of Professional Journalists), which is "a guide that encourages all who engage in journalism to take responsibility for the information they provide, regardless of medium."

I'll just highlight some of the principles, which I personally mean are clearly violated in this special case.

Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting and interpreting information.

Journalists should:

• Take responsibility for the accuracy of their work. Verify information before releasing it. Use original sources whenever possible.

• Remember that neither speed nor format excuses inaccuracy.

• Provide context. Take special care not to misrepresent or oversimplify in promoting, previewing or summarizing a story.

• Gather, update and correct information throughout the life of a news story.

• Be cautious when making promises, but keep the promises they make.

• Identify sources clearly. The public is entitled to as much information as possible to judge the reliability and motivations of sources.

• Consider sources’ motives before promising anonymity. Reserve anonymity for sources who may face danger, retribution or other harm, and have information that cannot be obtained elsewhere. Explain why anonymity was granted.

• Diligently seek subjects of news coverage to allow them to respond to criticism or allegations of wrongdoing.

• Avoid undercover or other surreptitious methods of gathering information unless traditional, open methods will not yield information vital to the public.

• Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable. Give voice to the voiceless.

• Support the open and civil exchange of views, even views they find repugnant.

• Recognize a special obligation to serve as watchdogs over public affairs and government. Seek to ensure that the public’s business is conducted in the open, and that public records are open to all.

• Provide access to source material when it is relevant and appropriate.

• Boldly tell the story of the diversity and magnitude of the human experience. Seek sources whose voices we seldom hear.

• Avoid stereotyping. Journalists should examine the ways their values and experiences may shape their reporting.

• Label advocacy and commentary.

• Never deliberately distort facts or context, including visual information. Clearly label illustrations and re-enactments.

• Never plagiarize. Always attribute.

Minimize Harm

Ethical journalism treats sources, subjects, colleagues and members of the public as human beings deserving of respect.

Journalists should:

• Balance the public’s need for information against potential harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance or undue intrusiveness.

• Show compassion for those who may be affected by news coverage. Use heightened sensitivity when dealing with juveniles, victims of sex crimes, and sources or subjects who are inexperienced or unable to give consent. Consider cultural differences in approach and treatment.

• Recognize that legal access to information differs from an ethical justification to publish or broadcast.

• Realize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than public figures and others who seek power, influence or attention. Weigh the consequences of publishing or broadcasting personal information.

• Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity, even if others do.

• Balance a suspect’s right to a fair trial with the public’s right to know. Consider the implications of identifying criminal suspects before they face legal charges.

• Consider the long-term implications of the extended reach and permanence of publication. Provide updated and more complete information as appropriate.

Journalists should:

​

• Explain ethical choices and processes to audiences. Encourage a civil dialogue with the public about journalistic practices, coverage and news content.

• Respond quickly to questions about accuracy, clarity and fairness.

• Acknowledge mistakes and correct them promptly and prominently. Explain corrections and clarifications carefully and clearly.

• Expose unethical conduct in journalism, including within their organizations

• Abide by the same high standards they expect of others.

​

Source: http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp


It's amazing to see that some (I'm looking at you R. Miller and K. Smith) are able to violate over half of the principles in just one single case. I honestly find it sickening, because they are able to just spew out shit without any consequences at all, which begs the question: Who is watching the watchdog?

 

[Ajay]

It's amazing to see that some (I'm looking at you R. Miller and K. Smith) are able to violate over half of the principles in just one single case. I honestly find it sickening, because they are able to just spew out shit without any consequences at all, which begs the question: Who is watching the watchdog?

IMO that's the worst thing about when people who played the game move straight into journalism/broadcasting without having put in the time to learn the craft.

Sure they bring knowledge of the game, but they also bring a narrow view of things due to being biased about certain players, teams, issues.

They are also generally stubborn to a fault.