• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Mike Trivisonno Interview With Larry Dolan

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Gunther

In Chill Mode
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
4,612
Reaction score
4,852
Points
113
Interview occurred at 5:10 today on WTAM 1100. I typed the following up as I listened. Please keep in mind that these are not exact quotes, but my paraphrasing of the interview. Since radio interview transcripts are not always available, I felt it would be appropriate to paraphrase so that Tribe fans who missed the interview could get the basics of the conversation. Please do not quote this for this reason.

=========================================================

Triv: Please expand on your recent comment that the Indians’ plan is to “go to the World Series every 4-5 years if lucky, compete for playoffs the rest of the years, because that is ‘as good as it gets for this market’”.

Dolan: Over the last four years, should have won the World Series in ’07, and could have won the World Series in ‘05, and we were about .500 the rest of the time. We really should have won in 2007. It was there for the taking, but that’s baseball – need to plan for the future constantly.

Triv: We recently gave away a Cy Young winner, and a great hitter (who wanted to be here) – can you discuss?

Dolan: Those were very difficult decisions to make, the Victor Martinez trade was the hardest thing Mark Shapiro has ever done. A number of factors played into the decision: 1. finances 2. talent looking forward 3. needs looking forward. Do we not make the trades and take the chance for ‘10, or make the moves to bring in more talent? Long term, right thing to do. As a result, in ‘10 we won’t be as competitive as we would have been if we had not made the trades, but after ‘10 we will be.

Triv: Fans aren’t buying this. Will crucify you at the gate next season.

Dolan: Neither approach was comfortable, we knew we would be unpopular, but if we did nothing, people would have been much more unhappy than they are now. We were going to see a decline in ‘10 attendance anyway. We needed to open a new window of opportunity like we did in ‘02. This is not a rebuild – it is a retool. Core will be there, plus a lot of young talent, maybe we can supplement with talent outside of the organization (free agents), but don’t know for sure right now.

Triv: Are you losing 16M this year?

Dolan: Yes, and if we had not made the moves that we made, our losses would have been much greater and the impact of those losses would have been felt for quite awhile. We think we’re doing as good a job as anyone else in this situation. I invite fans to find someone who is doing more as an organization in the same financial situation.

Triv: What’s the sense of being an Indian’s fan when we trade our stars away?

Dolan: Only a handful of teams can sign their own stars. (The financial reality of baseball.)

Triv: If we sold-out every game, would we be able to sign our stars?

Dolan: Not all of them, but maybe one or two. Payroll could go to around 100M if all sold-out. Corporate partnership is not what it used to be. We have great challenges in our community, we have 3.5 million seats to sell (compared to Browns and Cavs), so we ask more of the community and are more vulnerable to the whims of the community. Team needs to be innovative, have the willingness to do the unpopular thing to compete in the future. Need some luck also.

Triv: If economics get worse, is it possible we could lose The Indians in Cleveland?

Dolan: I don’t see that happening.

(General discussion of the state of Cleveland as a community.)

Triv: Progressive Field has 135 suites, less than half of those are sold. How important is that revenue?

Dolan: Extraordinarily important. Along with advertising, ticket sales are the operating revenue necessary to pay salaries.

Triv: What comes first – the chicken or the egg? (Do you build a winner first to improve attendance, or do you need attendance before building a winner?)

Dolan: Build a winning team and they will come. Saw a little of this in ‘07 when we drew 2.2 million. ‘08 attendance not as good. New York couldn’t buy a playoff spot last year. Like every other team, we have to do our best to spend within our means and remain financially sound.

Triv: Do you support a salary cap?

Dolan: Yes, that’s a no brainer. More important would be NFL-like revenue sharing, and let the clubs spend according to their own desires and plans.

Triv: Would another owner spend more on the Indians than you are spending?

Dolan: Owners spend based on the team’s bankroll, so during the season it is the team that is really spending, not the owner. Owner’s spend at the end of the season, when they see how much money the team needs. Larger market teams have more resources, therefore spend more.

Triv: Fans have no sympathy for your financial situation. We want a winner.

Dolan: We understand. You want to see the team you love win, you don’t want to see me balance my checkbook. However, we have to live within the realities of the system. We do take financial risks, but within reason. We want to build a team that wins also, but do not want to bankrupt ourselves in the process. Talk to hockey fans in Phoenix right now. We want to avoid that.

Triv: Regarding Mark Shapiro and Eric Wedge. Will you evaluate at the end of the year? Is it possible that both are gone?

Dolan: Mark will not be gone. He has made mistakes, but he has learned from them and he is not in jeopardy of losing his job this season. Eric is different. I feel we have underachieved in the last couple of years. The fans are frustrated. We are making an ongoing assessment of the situation.

Triv: Are these latest trades the defining moment for Shapiro? If they don’t work out in the next two years, is Mark gone?

Dolan: I don’t think it is as dramatic as all that. I can’t speak to a couple of years down the road and what may happen. If we keep losing, that is one thing. But basically I'm very happy with Mark, and he is not going anywhere.

Triv: Do you have more confidence in Shapiro than you do Wedge?

Dolan: Can’t really answer that. (Avoided the question.)

Triv: This will all be a tough sell to the fans.

Dolan: Fans won’t buy in to it until we begin to win, and I understand that.
========================================================

If I missed anything, or if you feel I did not represent the conversation properly, please feel free to correct me.

One last note: my impression was that Wedge is gone after the season is over. Though he did not say anything against Wedge, Dolan did not have high praise for Wedge like he did for Shapiro.
 
Gotta give Dolan credit. Took it like a man. I don't get why the majority of fans are so pissed at the Dolans.
 
Gotta give Dolan credit. Took it like a man. I don't get why the majority of fans are so pissed at the Dolans.

Are you serious? He just traded two of our best players signed to very friendly deals for trash.

With CC, he had a case. He did not have a case this year.
 
Are you serious? He just traded two of our best players signed to very friendly deals for trash.

With CC, he had a case. He did not have a case this year.

I'm with you but while the deals we made were very underwhelming let's wait a while before we judge them with any sort of finality.

That said, no idea how he approved the trades.
 
Listening to the interview, I have to admit that Dolan sounded competent, alert, and intelligent. It was all business - he had the perfect tone for the interview as well. I did not have as much of a hard time taking the same info from him as I did from Shapiro. Even though I respect Shapiro, he recites this stuff by rote and there is something in the way that he says these things that makes me cringe - like he is a snakeoil salesman or something. In this light, Dolan sounded great, as a matter of fact. I have more confidence in the organization having listened to Dolan today. He held his own against Triv, which is no easy thing to do.

The one area that I felt Triv "got him" was when he was implying that Dolan did not have enough money to own the team properly. At that point, Dolan sounded a little like he was making excuses, even though his arguments were generally sound.

All in all, a really good interview.
 
Look for Mark to get promoted to president. I like Shapiro and dont by any means think he should be punished for this teams more performance. Wedge on the other hand....:thumbdown

Good interview thanks Gunter.
 
Are you serious? He just traded two of our best players signed to very friendly deals for trash.

With CC, he had a case. He did not have a case this year.

What was he suppose to do? If we don't trade those guys, we get shit in return from their absence. It's the way small markets have to perform. It pained me to see VMart traded, but it was a necessary evil.
 
All I have to say about this is Wedge better be gone and I REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY wish there was a salary cap in baseball.

He was also on All Bets Are Off today and he sounded like he was really hoping for a cap.

I didn't catch the beginning, so I don't know exactly what they were talking about, but they did say something about a possible lockout coming. Bruce went on to say it would hurt him to see it happen, but he would sacrifice one year of baseball if it leveled the playing field by adding a cap.... Dolan agreed.


I just don't get it at all. Why not have a cap? It would benefit every team excluding maybe 5-8.

When talking about the lockout, Dolan also said we will see what baseball wants. Do they want to level the playing field and make it fair for everyone like the NFL, or do they just want people to only care about New York, Boston, and LA every year.
 
What was he suppose to do? If we don't trade those guys, we get shit in return from their absence. It's the way small markets have to perform. It pained me to see VMart traded, but it was a necessary evil.

They weren't FAs....what do you mean if we didn't trade them? We'd still have them for the rest of this year and next year. They aren't old and washed up or at the end of their careers....

Stupid trade and it made zero sense. Esp since none of those players are going to help next year, if ever.
 
I just don't get it at all. Why not have a cap? It would benefit every team excluding maybe 5-8.

The baseball clubs would want a cap. The player's union definately would not. Up until now, the baseball player's union has had a great deal of power, but with the current economic crunch the owners will be far more determined to implement a salary cap than they have in previous negotiations.

Ultimately though, once a salary cap is implemented, it will most likely never go away. Because of that, the players union has a very good reason to do everything in their power from keeping a cap being put in place, and likely the only way it will happen is if there is an extended lockout... possibly an entire season without baseball.
 
They weren't FAs....what do you mean if we didn't trade them? We'd still have them for the rest of this year and next year. They aren't old and washed up or at the end of their careers....

Stupid trade and it made zero sense. Esp since none of those players are going to help next year, if ever.

Great findings, inspector clouseau. I know how long they had on their contracts.
I find it difficult to believe you really don't understand why these players were moved. Can you not grasp the reality of the situation? Let me break it down for you, real, real, real simple:

Cliff Lee, who's about to turn 31, has 1.5 years left on his contract. He was not going to re-sign with this team after NEXT season. Since he's under contract for 1.5 years, his value is worth more NOW then it would be next season.

And FWIW, those scrubs that we got back have been pitching phenomenally. Carrasco went 8 innings last night, struck out 10, and gave up 4 hits and 0 runs. The game before he went 7 2/3rds of almost identical stats.

On to VMart.
I love(d) VMart. My favorite player on the Indians. You know who I said the same thing about? Manny Ramirez. Then Thome. See a trend here? Shapiro got burned not once, but twice by the loyalty factor. In this market we play in as a mid-market team, our GM has to be as shrewd as it gets. He cannot view these players as players. He has to view them as commodities, tradable assets.
Also, it helps when the system is stocked with catchers, especially one by the name of Carlos Santana who is absolutely tearing up AA this year, much like he tore up High A last season.

While the odds of VMart re-signing with Cleveland were probably around 40/50%, we got an extremely nice package for him, a group of players who will help by 2011, maybe next year.

So again, quit acting like an emotional girl, look at the logistics of the situation, think like a business man, and draw another conclusion. Yes, I stopped running on the treadmill while VMart was giving his teary-eyed away speech. It hurt to see, but we are the Cleveland Indians, not the yankees or Red Sox or Dodgers. The players we received are all C+ - A prospects, the majority of them being B, B+'s. Wen you collect 7 of those type of players for 2 guys, 1 who wasn't going to re-sign, one who may have but would still have faced heavy competition, it's easy to see how and why this was done.

Another thing I'd like to point out to you. Have you taken a look at our AA roster? It may be one of the best AA rosters of all time (in case you didn't know, AA is where the majority of your young, stud prospects are stashed. Mind you, this team is also without Kelvin De La Cruz, who got shut down earlier in the season and was a top 10 indians prospect.

C - Santana
1B - Mills
2B - Rodriguez
SS - Rivero
3B - Chisenhall
LF - Weglarz
RF - Drennen/McBride/Head

SP - Tomlin
SP - Gomez
SP - Edell
SP - Graham (Betancourt trade)

Relievers Wagner, Wright, Smith, Stiller, Putnam, Judy
Scott Barnes, the guy we got from Garko, will be up to AA soon.
 
While the odds of VMart re-signing with Cleveland were probably around 40/50%, we got an extremely nice package for him, a group of players who will help by 2011, maybe next year.


Nonsense, they're all garbage and will never help...EVER! (/sarcasm)

Damage pretty much nailed it with his post.

This is the world we live in people, running around looking for boogeymen to blame is just an exercise in futility.
 
I don't think we got an "extremely nice package" for Vmart, honestly. I can see why someone would be all right with what we got, but we didn't really get any elite prospects.
 
I don't think we got an "extremely nice package" for Vmart, honestly. I can see why someone would be all right with what we got, but we didn't really get any elite prospects.

Umm, Nick Hagadone was regarded as one of their top prospects. Masterson just turned 24 and many viewed him as the eventual replacement for Smoltz. Now, they really don't have anyone to fill that void. Have you seen him pitch yet? he's been awesome.
And Price has been dominating. So while we didn't get Buchholz (who I'm not really that high on to begin with), we got 1 MLB ready guy, 1 very good prospect and one close to elite prospect in Hagadone...all of which are 24 or younger.

Put it like this: Does Buchholz > Masterson, Hagadone, Price?
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top