@EdMonix11 mentioned the potential Chip Kelly - Ed Marynowitz pairing. Is Ed well regarded? Does he know his shit?
Are there any GM candidates connected to Gase?
Edit: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/01/04/browns-may-have-made-it-harder-to-hire-a-g-m/
This says that since our GM won't have say over the 53 then we can't hire away someone under contract with another team unless they give us permission. Hopefully that doesn't hurt us.
I think Ed Marynowitz will follow Chip, where ever he goes. Ed was the Director of Player Personnel for Nick Saban at Alabama from 2008-2011 before taking the assistant director of pro scouting job with the Eagles in 2012. Saban gives him strong recommendations consistently-- three #1 recruiting classes, two National Championships.
The Director of Player Personnel at the collegiate level is not a coach, so he can't recruit off campus, but he's the guy who pours through ALL of those HS game tapes so he can tell the coaching staff who to pursue. Mark Pantoni is in that role at Ohio State, FWIW. It's hard to say what role Ed played in their draft picks this year since Chip called the shots but I think he's the TYPE of guy the Browns will attract to the GM job-- i.e. a young guy, inexperienced, scouting background.
I think someone with a title like assistant director of player personnel, 2-3 steps below the GM, is who the Browns should target. The title will vary from team to team but it looks like the Browns REALLY limited their options in this search, if that article is correct. Wouldn't surprise me if they didn't know that was a rule.....
This will be a really tricky hire for the Browns. The top GM candidates are off the board immediately based on NFL rules and the Browns organizational structure alone-- no final roster decisions, head coach being hired first-- that's a really tough sell for even a moderate-level candidate. That's not to say this CAN'T work, because it can, but the search got a whole lot harder.
Also, I would love to hear the thoughts of @MoFlo and @Randolphkeys right now!
I actually am not too pissed about the Sashi hiring. Is he inexperienced? Heck yeah. But football team-building is trending more and more towards analytics. The Panthers and Seahawks have both built their teams around a similar model. Moreover, Cardinals and Bengals have leaned towards this approach to team-building in recent years.
Essentially, on offense, you want to be able to move the ball effectively with a variety of threats. Quarterback thus will have a quick release (not to be confused with strong arm, although that never hurts) and be somewhat mobile, runningbacks will be able to catch the ball out of the backfield, tight ends will focus on improving other areas of the offense, receivers mainly speedy who can make yards after the catch.
Other metrics, such as arm strength, creative power running, precise routes, etc. are valued, but not nearly as important. This is why a player like Deangelo Williams, who is a great runningback, is frankly irrelevant and unnecessary for this type of offense.
On defense, the goal is to make your opponent's offense inefficient and one dimensional. Thus, the primary job is to stop the running game. On top of that, one wants an incredibly strong pass rush, which further reduces the opponent's passing game's efficiency.
This is opposed to the successful Belichikian and Cowherian school, where matchups are much more important than efficiency. Every defense wants to stop the run, it is how they stop the pass that makes an analytic defense. Effectively, there is a willingness to give up big plays in an analytic-heavy defense, but to do so as little as possible.
I think that was a bit of gibberish, but everyone should get the point. I wouldn't be surprised to see the Browns pursue Sean McDermott, Josh McDaniels, and Adam Gase as coaching candidates. All three have experienced analytics previously during their careers and would be a good fit with Sashi.
Dear god... We're fucked.
I would argue having an analytics guy that knows other aspects of football with final decision-making authority is great. And while the NFL is clearly lagging behind basketball, baseball, and even soccer in the analytics department, there are clear ways to measure efficiency. Thus, it is these measurements that are being used by teams like the Panthers and the Seahawks, and will hopefully be utilized by the Browns.One big problem is that most non-skill positions on football don't have much truly objective data that can be used as the basis for analytics. So if that's the sole basis of knowledge of the guy making key drafting decisions (which it is in this case for all practical purposes), then he essentially knows nothing about evaluating all those players.
Having an analytics guy for input is great. Having him with final decision-making authority is not.