Cratylus
FLAWLESS
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 5,121
- Reaction score
- 10,014
- Points
- 123
i got what i wanted out of this thread, for you big 10 floosies to recognize that the SEC is the superior conference and that the SEC is a force to be reckoned with year in and year out.
"A force to be reckoned with"??? :rofl: So tell me, James... this "force to be reckoned with" of yours... this high and mighty SEC that strikes fear into the hearts of opposing conferences... if they're so daunting and dominating, how do you explain this:
In the past 7 years, the SEC and the Big Ten have met on the field 18 times. In those games, the head-to-head record is 9-9. That’s right, James, the high and mighty SEC and the lowly and pathetic Big Ten have played each other to a 9-9 tie - 9 wins apiece when teams from these two conferences face each other. It appears that your vaunted SEC isn’t so high and mighty after all, at least not when it has to play the Big Ten. Imagine that: A conference that is “a force to be reckoned with” having a .500 winning percentage against such a weak and sucky conference as the Big Ten.
I guess the Big Ten isn’t so horrible after all, is it, James? I mean, we’re good enough to beat you as often as you beat us. Oh wait, I forgot. You're the guy who likes to have an opinion about college football yet chooses to ignore relevant facts that would put that view in jeopardy of being exposed as laughable and inconsistent.
Last edited: