Rate the last movie you saw

[PIP]

Just watched Anchorman 2. What a piece of shit. There were only 3 good things in this garbage movie.

kanYe
Big Willie
Marion Cotillard

I would love for Mehgan Good to grope me like that in an office.....

 

[TJ Detweiler]

Monuments Men: 3/10

To put it bluntly, the movie could have been absolutely incredible. Amazing story, but there was absolutely no character development whatsoever throughout the movie. Extremely disappointing.

 

[David.]

scarlett johansen is not hot

 

[Surge]

scarlett johansen is not hot

Then I'd sleep with an ugly chick.

 

[Nicky]

scarlett johansen is not hot

I get ungodly shit for saying Channing Tatum isn't "hot".

 

[Surge]

I get ungodly shits

Nothing new here....

 

[David.]

I get ungodly shit for saying Channing Tatum isn't "hot".

its all preference, who gives a shitreally.

 

[Ruken]

its all preference, who gives a shitreally.

Those roids have screwed with your perception of hot I think

 

[Nicky]

Those roids have screwed with your perception of hot I think

Disagree.

This is the same situation with music/movies/clothing, etc. Not everyone is going to agree on the same thing. She does seem rather cunty.

 

[MattyFos.]

Gouri have you read the synopsis of Interstellar yet? It seems so confusing. I'm worried

 

[Nicky]

Sick day--

Please advise something good to watch.
I watched Summer Rental (John Candy) last night. I remember that was one of the movies that we would rent frequently from Blockbuster. It was enjoyable for me, but definitely not his best movie.

 

[gourimoko]

Gouri have you read the synopsis of Interstellar yet? It seems so confusing. I'm worried

The movie is based on the concept of man's breaking of barriers; this time, just as we broke the sound barrier, we'd be breaking the light/time barrier. The film is based on Kip Thorne's lectures on faster-than-light travel and their immediate implications for anyone involved. Because you see, if you actually were to move truly faster-than-light, you'd be moving faster than time propagates... This means, in essence, you'd be catching up to previous events, and thus, moving backwards in time (time travel, into the past).

This is the basis of the movie, and likely McCaughney will have to wrestle with this phenomena at some point (if not throughout) the film.

Originally, Steven Spielberg was set to produce/direct but Christopher Nolan has taken over the project and begun to humanize the story. Originally it was to be a sci-fi film mostly set in space, but now it seems that it has taken on a much more human, personal and interpersonal context. So, while being science fiction, it will likely be more like Inception than Gravity; both having a science fiction base, but definition not being the same genre of movie.

If I were to venture a guess, I'd say Nolan might revisit the narrative style that made him famous in Momento and put into into an actual temporal context of disjointed events. But again, that's just a guess.

 

[natedagg]

If you have an interest in Somali Pirates, I recommend Stolen Seas. It's a documentary that puts Somali piracy in historical, political, economic context in a refreshing, unassuming way, all interspersed with interviews from a shipping company's CEO and a Somali negotiator, as they recollect their negotiation. You also hear the recordings from the event. 9/10.

 

[Maximus]

Sharktopus - 7/10. So bad it's good.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/U87zVkIXNI0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

 

[Damage]

The movie is based on the concept of man's breaking of barriers; this time, just as we broke the sound barrier, we'd be breaking the light/time barrier. The film is based on Kip Thorne's lectures on faster-than-light travel and their immediate implications for anyone involved. Because you see, if you actually were to move truly faster-than-light, you'd be moving faster than time propagates... This means, in essence, you'd be catching up to previous events, and thus, moving backwards in time (time travel, into the past).

This is the basis of the movie, and likely McCaughney will have to wrestle with this phenomena at some point (if not throughout) the film.

Originally, Steven Spielberg was set to produce/direct but Christopher Nolan has taken over the project and begun to humanize the story. Originally it was to be a sci-fi film mostly set in space, but now it seems that it has taken on a much more human, personal and interpersonal context. So, while being science fiction, it will likely be more like Inception than Gravity; both having a science fiction base, but definition not being the same genre of movie.

If I were to venture a guess, I'd say Nolan might revisit the narrative style that made him famous in Momento and put into into an actual temporal context of disjointed events. But again, that's just a guess.