marxus
Banned
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2012
- Messages
- 341
- Reaction score
- 221
- Points
- 0
Are you seriously trying to make the case that Spencer Hawes is a better defensive player than Tristan Thompson? Do you really not understand how bad Spencer Hawes is on that end of the court? Let's put some perspective on your outstanding use of advanced stats.
Defensive rating is a great indicator for how a team's defense performs while a certain player is in a game, but it doesn't hold up as a great comparison between two individual players.
Yes, Hawes posted a lower defensive rating at 106 than Tristan's 108. But let's add some context to those numbers, because throwing out the defensive rating alone doesn't do anything for me. TT has an offensive rating of 110 to go along with his defensive rating of 108, making the Cavs an estimated 2 points better per 100 possessions on the court than off. With Hawes on the court the Cavs had an offensive rating of 108 with the aforementioned 106 defensive rating, meaning Hawes/TT had roughly the same net difference on the game when on the court.
Now, for some more context. Tristan Thompson played about a quarter of the season with Andrew Bynum. The team was absolutely terrible in that stretch, their offensive rating (96.8)* and defensive rating (110.5)* with Bynum/TT on the court was absolutely terrible. That's going to drag his numbers down, not to mention the fact TT started more games with Alonzo Gee at 24 (where he averaged about 20 minutes a game) than Hawes did (6). Bynum/Gee were just absolutely fucking terrible this year, advanced stats and the eye test both confirm this to be true.
*NBAwowy.com - Bynum/TT played 724 possessions together, with the Cavs scoring 701 points while giving up 800.
For the season TT and Hawes both had exactly 2.3 defensive win shares. How's that better than Tristan? Thanks for leaving out offensive win shares (TT- 3.4 Hawes- 2.2) as well, seems pretty selective when using stats that are almost never used exclusively without the other. Others might call it cherry picking. But then again it doesn't help your argument that at 21 and 22 Tristan already produced more combined Win Shares than Hawes has ever produced in a season.
Again with the selective numbers. Looking at defensive rebounding alone is pointless, and it's not even like Hawes is wildly more productive at grabbing defensive boards per game (6.1 to 5.9) than TT. Hawes' Defensive Rebounding % is also only slighter higher (23.6 to 21.5) as well.
When looking at Total Rebounding %, a much better indicator of a player's actual rebounding ability, Tristan comes out ahead at 16.3% to Hawes' 14.5%. That's a slight dip from last year's number for TT (17.5%), but 16.3% actually equates to Spencer Hawes' career best in TRB%.
I can't fight this one. Spencer Hawes has been a much better shot blocker than Tristan has been this year. There's reasons why Tristan rarely blocks shots anymore though, chiefly being rarely playing at minutes at C anymore. Here's a post from a few weeks back that highlights the biggest reasons Tristan isn't blocking shots at a respectable rate anymore (his block rate of 3.3% from his rookie season playing as a 20-year-old is actually the exact same as Hawes' career block percentage):
Other than opponent FG% at the rim, which I'd hope a 7'1'' center is better than a 6'8'' PF at, no advanced metric designed to show individual ability shows Hawes as a better defender than Tristan.
When looking at opponent PER Tristan (17.4) blows Hawes (20.8) out of the water.
When using Synergy Tristan's physical, sound defense grades out worlds better than the slow-footed Hawes. Tristan ended up giving up .9 points per possession on plays where his man attempted a shot or had an assist, a turnover, or a foul. Spencer Hawes was at 1.07 for the Cavs. That is absolutely putrid, it ranks 454 for all NBA players. That's one of the worst marks in the league, especially considering it's coming from our starting center. You know, the position where most teams expect at least a modicum of defensive ability.
But really, you don't even need advanced stats to tell you Tristan is the better defender. Just pop in any game from the last few weeks of the season. I like what Hawes brings to the table offensively but dear god is he an abomination on the defensive end. John Henson and Kelly Olynyk still go to sleep smiling every night after they made Hawes their personal whipping boy. I'm actually in shock there are posters defending his abilities on that side of the court. Other than being over 7 feet Hawes brings absolutely nothing to helping a team stop the opposition.
Not that it's much better, but he finished with 35.
I'd just like to say that I don't think Hawes is a good-or even average- defender. I'm just saying Tristan gets wayyyyyyyyyyyyy too much credit, with absolutely no evidence to support it. Tristan gets so much credit on defense because he's just so terrible on offense that we assume there must be a reason he still gets 30+ minutes a game.
To be honest, I don't even really like any of the team stats for this conversation because of how the team evolved and the inconsistencies throughout the season. Nobody looks good. But, for argument's sake, Bynum's defensive rating was 106, and Alonzo Gee's was 107. Both right around Tristan's 108 on the season. Again, not good, but clearly Tristan doesn't look to be making an positive impact. I'd prefer to ignore small sample size data like Bynum's 15 minutes a game for a third of a season. If Tristan was an impact player, he'd make an impact. That "absolutely terrible" 110 defensive rating with Bynum and TT isn't all that different from TT's 108 overall. Also, for Spencer, I was only using his 27 games with the Cavs and equating them to a year, so his offensive win shares would be right around 3, as would his defensive win shares, and his overall WS/48 would be .114 to Tristan's .106.
Spencer is never going to get a ton of offensive rebounds, due to playing away from the basket. If you look at rebounding opportunities, where the ball comes within 3.5 of a player with a chance at the rebound, Tristan only grabs 54% of those, while Spencer gets 59%. For comparison, Andy grabs 58%, Zeller and AB get 57, Kyrie even gets 55%! Weirdly, Jarrett Jack is among the league leaders at 69.3%. And Tristan, as a rookie, showed signs of becoming an elite offensive rebounder, but he has gotten significantly worse every year, based on his rebounding rate.
The FG% at the rim, Tristan was measured at 6'8.75, 227lbs at the draft camp 3 years ago with a 7'1 wingspan. There is no excuse for allowing 59% at the rim. Kenneth Faried seems to be just fine, only allowing 49% as an undersized hustle PF with no other rim protector next to him, and he measured at 6'7.5. Jared Sullinger only allows 54%. Harrison Barnes(!) allows just 49%!!! Again, Spencer isn't a good rim protector, it's just that Tristan is among the worst in the league, in fact, among guys that defended at least 5 attempts per game, Tristan was second to last. Only Thad Young was worse.
The "eye test" has always told me Tristan looks confused, uncoordinated, and clumsy out there. Spencer always seems to know what to do, just doesn't have the athleticism to always get it done. I think with a full off-season of scheming for Mike Brown, we can find ways to maximize his talent and basketball IQ. TT has had three years and, if anything, is regressing.