Damage
fuckface
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2007
- Messages
- 13,599
- Reaction score
- 21,604
- Points
- 135
But he was right!Seriously… if I hear Sanchez say “got ‘em” before a play even happens again, I might break my TV.
But he was right!Seriously… if I hear Sanchez say “got ‘em” before a play even happens again, I might break my TV.
Haha. Yes! Just so annoying. I’m already watching with my friends… act like an announcer.But he was right!
408 total yards, 379 passing and 29 rushing. And we needed every bit of it considering what we gifted the Bears with.We just put up 377 yards on a very good defense
We can win with Flacco, because when our defense shows up, they can cold stop anybody.. I don't need Peyton manning back there when we have the dogs on defense..Yes and no. Flacco was responsible for gifting the Bears 2 touchdowns. He's got the ability to sling some nice throws at any given time, and he's very poised... except for when he isn't.
He is a mixed bag at best, with a very high potential reward, while always being a risk to lose you the game at any time as well.
not to mention they beat the Niners and Colts on total bullshit penalties that went THE BROWNS WAY.The reason I know we'll win the Super Bowl is because any other year the Bears come down with that Hail Mary. The simulation has officially glitched.
And bc Flacco.
Priorities, my friendHad a family Zoom call thing at 4 wtf I missed everything after the cooper TD, we fuckin won?
FUCK YALL CHICAGO BITCHES
Why did Stefanski call timeout at the end of the first half?
I disagreed with the TO as well. I think the thinking was our D was in scoring position and at the time points were beyond precious.That was one of the worst decisions of his career.
With two timeouts, I get it.
But with just one timeout, it's really not justifiable. You simply can't get the ball back if the Bears run the ball.
Why did Stefanski call timeout at the end of the first half?
Wouldn't call it cockiness. He was looking for the D to create a turnover. Was a really poor decision.Pure cockiness, wanted another chance at creating a turnover. Came so close to costing us big time.