Hurl Bruce
Logmaster
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2005
- Messages
- 14,689
- Reaction score
- 25,985
- Points
- 135
I'm underwhelmed with this draft.
Outside of Greedy and Mack Wilson, you it seems kinda meh. Happy to be proven wrong.I'm underwhelmed with this draft.
I actually think if you include Greedy and Wilson, this draft is kind of meh.
But, that's fine. Good teams go into drafts getting guys who might to produce year 1, and the only guy I think will get a legit shot is Greedy. Everyone else is a down the line guy. Which is kind of a bummer but oh well, I guess their board didn't line up with some of their holes.
I'm underwhelmed with this draft.
I'm underwhelmed with this draft.
I am not overwhelmed or underwhelmed. Dorsey got good value at positions of need with only a few asterisks and caveats and then took some fliers. I guess that makes me sufficiently whelmed.
Drafting a kicker has no analytics written on it. It provides the second least amount to wins out of any position and the best provide little more than a replacement level kicker. This was the only pick in the Browns’ draft that could not be justified with analytics.Drafting a kicker has all kinds of analytics written all over it. Place kicking is one of the most important positions in the game and teams fill it with undrafted players and walk ons, probably because even though they use their feet, they aint really football players and scouts are not good at picking them. I’m fine with the choice.
Not sure if a 5th round DT would make a big difference if there’s an injury. A vet would be a much better choice. But they should consider getting someone on a rookie contract next draft for financial safety.
I'm not saying I agree or disagree with this, but tell me what picks YOU would have made with the draft capital the Browns had to where you would've felt good about it. FiveThous and Amherst can chime in as well. I'm not saying those critical are wrong. I'm just interested to know what you would've done differently.