I think the Nets are going to end up regretting their choice to go big game hunting for Kyrie and post-Achilles durant. Pre-achilles, sure. But I think even when he's back this Nets team is probably second-tier East contenders at absolute best. I just don't see MVP Durant returning ever again. They need him to come back from the achilles at 100% for it to have been worth it. Tough ask.
If one guys game will translate post achilles, it's KD though. That smooth perimeter touch and unguardable length are just so deadly.
Can;t remember the last time we saw a non-playoff team come out of nowhere to look as good as the Mavs are looking this year. Was shocked to see them beat the Bucks on the road last night without Luka. Yes, we all knew last year that Luka was a terrific rookie and that Porzingis would be helpful, but all of a sudden they are looking like a dark horse Finals contender, it usually takes years of development and building for a team to reach that point if it happens at all.
Luka being a legit MVP-level player in year 2 is basically unheard of.
Arguably Lebron was up there in his sophomore year, 27/7/7 on decent efficiency while leading the league in minutes and carrying an awful team to a winning record. But the Cavs weren't good enough to support an MVP bid, not a playoff team.
Fun question. Shaq and Duncan are the other two players who come to mind as being immediate top tier MVP candidates in their second year. Duncan a little different considering his age than the rest.
What's wild about Luka, versus Shaq, Bron and to a lesser extent Duncan...is that those 3 guys had varying levels of elite athleticism/physical traits that made them so physically imposing early on, particularly Duncan and Bron... And both Shaq and Duncan played multiple years in college whereas Luka is much more like LeBron except instead of playing Ohio high schools from 14-18 he was playing against elite Euroleague competition. Which is probably what explains how he is already this good.
Luka is, by NBA standards, a slightly thicccccccc 20y/o Slovenian who is a 2nd year MVP basically 95% due to skill. Sure his size of a modern NBA 4 helps greatly, but he isn't dominating athletically by any means. It's all skill, playing smarter, etc.
Fun question. Shaq and Duncan are the other two players who come to mind as being immediate top tier MVP candidates in their second year. Duncan a little different considering his age than the rest.
What's wild about Luka, versus Shaq, Bron and to a lesser extent Duncan...is that those 3 guys had varying levels of elite athleticism/physical traits that made them so physically imposing early on, particularly Duncan and Bron... And both Shaq and Duncan played multiple years in college whereas Luka is much more like LeBron except instead of playing Ohio high schools from 14-18 he was playing against elite Euroleague competition. Which is probably what explains how he is already this good.
Luka is, by NBA standards, a slightly thicccccccc 20y/o Slovenian who is a 2nd year MVP basically 95% due to skill. Sure his size of a modern NBA 4 helps greatly, but he isn't dominating athletically by any means. It's all skill, playing smarter, etc.