SixPACK
All-Star
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2009
- Messages
- 6,607
- Reaction score
- 6,021
- Points
- 113
It's weird to me you all are so opposed to this.
It's weird to me you are so for it.
Jeremy Hill, good RB. Dude saved my fantasy championship. But he's not available. (I don't know where this talk came from)
To your point of having a reliable, consistent RB. That's not what we are going for. We, the Browns, are going for a 2/3-headed monster like that big fucking dog from the Harry Potter series (please god I am sorry for using a Harry Potter reference on RBF). We do not need A reliable, consistent, RB. We need to give the ball to the hot hand, keep bringing in fresh legs, mix & match to keep the D guessing so we can open up holes for the wideouts and give Johnny some time to throw the ball.
Yes, Crow and West didn't put up Hill type numbers, but Hill also had multiple (I believe 5 when I looked) where he had at least 22 carries. West was a whiny bitch a few games. We moved to throwing the ball to try and catch back up. Mack going down hurt us like crazy. Now with him back, Erving added, WR "threats" added, I can see good things coming from both of them.
In the end, I am completely against bringing in a veteran RB.