Hmmm...I'm not a fan of these narratives in which a wide range of posters and beliefs are collapsed into a single point of view so that some kind of "common sense" counterpoint can be made.
Wiggins for example: some loved him from the get-go, some have never been impressed, some have views that have authentically evolved, positively and negatively. But now all the divergent views are collapsed into One Mythical Poster so that some have a straw man to fight against.
The easiest and cheapest way to "win" a debate is to create a fake consensus that never existed then knock it down. Color me unimpressed.