gourimoko
Fighting the good fight!
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 39,845
- Reaction score
- 53,645
- Points
- 148
There is no foxp206
There is this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FOXP2
Could be a semantic / syntactical difference.
There is no foxp206
Are they approved by the RCF source committee?The hell it isn't.
Many papers written.
Looks like it's important to have.
Yeah, I did my googles and nothing came up.There is no foxp206
Scholar too.Yeah, I did my googles and nothing came up.
Looks like it's important to have.
Forkhead box protein P2 (FOXP2) is a proteinthat, in humans, is encoded by the FOXP2gene, also known as CAGH44, SPCH1 or TNRC10, and is required for proper development of speech and language.[3]Initially identified as the genetic factor of speech disorder
We've been trolled boys.Scholar too.
We've been trolled boys.
Disgenics and eugenics are debatable issues though. At a point it becomes inhumane not to consider it. Mental illness, vaccinations, blindness and deafness, psy/sociopathy.We've been trolled boys.
Disgenics and eugenics are debatable issues though.
So everyone is the same genetically? Or do you take issue with the concept of improving society by way of genetics?No they're not, that's ... the point. Eugenics is a completely discredited science, and hasn't really anything to offer modern discourse as it's based on numerous false premises.
So everyone is the same genetically?
Or do you take issue with the concept of improving society by way of genetics?
The Google search lol. @King Stannis' posts seemed pretty out there which was unusual, so I felt like there might be some trolling going on. Then no results came up and that solidified it.
What gave it away?
So everyone is the same genetically? Or do you take issue with the concept of improving society by way of genetics?