• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Bucks showing their true colors.

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's my point Rimmage, you have no choice. Facts are what they are. Right now, the Bucks are the second best team in the central.

Rimmage, what is it that the Cavs need to do in order to beat the Bucks in Milwaukee on January 4, 2006? What adjustments have to be made? No adjustments?
 
TJ'sDa1 said:
That's my point Rimmage, you have no choice. Facts are what they are. Right now, the Bucks are the second best team in the central.

Rimmage, what is it that the Cavs need to do in order to beat the Bucks in Milwaukee on January 4, 2006? What adjustments have to be made? No adjustments?
When the Cavs had the second best record in the NBA, you didn't recognize that as fact...

But now that we are playing like Raptors-America, you're talkin' facts... ;)

It's one or the other SkinnyWise :chuckles:
 
TJ'sDa1 said:
That's my point Rimmage, you have no choice. Facts are what they are. Right now, the Bucks are the second best team in the central.

Rimmage, what is it that the Cavs need to do in order to beat the Bucks in Milwaukee on January 4, 2006? What adjustments have to be made? No adjustments?

Never argued facts.
 
LePIP said:
When the Cavs had the second best record in the NBA, you didn't recognize that as fact...

But now that we are playing like Raptors-America, you're talkin' facts... ;)

It's one or the other SkinnyWise :chuckles:

Of course I did. When they had that record, that's what they were BY RECORD. I did not think it would last however due to their easy strength of schedule at the time.

Good news for you: Joe Smith, Bobby Simmons, and Charlie Bell are all out for 4-6 weeks.

Bad news for you: You have a game thread to attend to. Yeeeesh.
 
TJ'sDa1 said:
Of course I did. When they had that record, that's what they were BY RECORD. I did not think it would last however due to their easy strength of schedule at the time.

Good news for you: Joe Smith, Bobby Simmons, and Charlie Bell are all out for 4-6 weeks.

Bad news for you: You have a game thread to attend to. Yeeeesh.

See, you still aren't getting it. Why do we care that Bucks players are injured? Why is that good news for us? It is non-news for us. You just don't get it.
 
TJ'sDa1 said:
Thus the reason TJ fed them to you.

Heh, this post almost personifies you. :chuckles:

Now hold a second. I know you are probably thinking: "Right because I know the facts and you don't". But is not what I mean though.

What I mean is that it's sole purpose is to aggravate and try to get someone to lash back at you. Yuck...I hate that post. :chuckles:
 
TJ'sDa1 said:
This is great stuff. I knew there would be one disgruntled fan that wanted to stand in and take a public beating. Rimage is wise, he knows when it's time to throw in the towel. You on the other hand are a glutton for punishment. :chuckles:

Let's visit a couple of your premises. First, do you not realize that there are critical momentum changing plays that are made that determine the outcome of EVERY game. Is it really significant that these plays occur with 4 minutes left versus 3 minutes left, 2, 1, ect.??? Of course not. It's a 48 minute contest and at the end there will be a WINNER and a LOSER....that's all that matters. Winning by 20 or winning by 1 holds the same significance in the grand scheme of things. Hypotheticals have no place in basketball.

Secondly, in response to your HYPOTHETICAL about TJ NOT hitting 3's to nail the Cavs, I could respond by saying how often does Lebron James score 52 points? That type of back and forth is meaningless. YOU LOST.

Be happy that Lebron was able to keep you in the game.

Suck it up and do better next time.

this is another reason why i dont want you incompentent ass on this site.

you first say that "lets see you win on the road by 20" and in this post i quoted you say it doesnt matter how many points you win by.

lebron can score 50 points almost every night if he wanted, and dont laugh like you dont know he cant.

"suck it up and do better next time" is that what you tell your boyfriend. i dont play for the fucking cavs you god damn fucking idiot.

why dont you go try talking in the mirror, that way you will get all of the attention you need.
 
Now Tj, I know you want to act a little suprised, make yourself the victim of cavincali's post by claim it is unwarranted and you haven't done anything to deserve it, but in all honesty it is what you want.

You want irritate us, and after a frustrating loss, you being suprised or offened would be down right silly, don't you agree? You are a Bucks fan, talking only about the Bucks, on an all Cavs board. Don't tell us you are here to converse anything basketball.
 
Rimage said:
Now Tj, I know you want to act a little suprised, make yourself the victim of cavincali's post by claim it is unwarranted and you haven't done anything to deserve it, but in all honesty it is what you want.

You want irritate us, and after a frustrating loss, you being suprised or offened would be down right silly, don't you agree? You are a Bucks fan, talking only about the Bucks, on an all Cavs board. Don't tell us you are here to converse anything basketball.

First, this is the internet and since there are no IP blocks on non-Cavs fans, then it isn't an "all Cavs site".

Secondly, I've talked about the Bucks, Cavs, and many other teams since I've been here so put the truth forth please.

Lastly, I didn't create this thread and on top of that, no one asked you to participate. If you don't like the content of 1 thread out of scores of threads, get out...it's that simple.

If you get "irritated" by the comments of a rival fan (even when what he says comes to pass) then that's an internal problem that YOU need to check. If you feel small or insecure, see a doctor. I'm a Bucks fan and you can't change that. When I speak, I will speak from the perspective of a Bucks fan while being fair and objective on serious issues. Did I get irritated and feel the need to surpress posters that claimed all offseason that Redd is one dimensional and less than Hughes, TJ Ford is an injury waiting to happen, Bogut will be a bust, the Bucks are not a deep team, the Cavs will sweep the Bucks, ect., ect.,.

I'm not claiming to be a victim at all. That's for the weak. I'll just continue to point out the hypocricies where they apply.

And you suggesting that I want YOUR attention....laughable. Since you want to put me in a box, I just take delight in watching and helping you contradict yourself. You come on here and tell people to ignore me and stop talking about the Bucks (a team that you're chasing) and yet, you still engage me in a meaningless dialouge. Believe me, I'm far beyond your ability to entrap, control, debate, one up, or whatever. If you persist, I will continue to put you in your place. So don't attempt to define the circumstances of my stay.
 
Rimage said:
See, you still aren't getting it. Why do we care that Bucks players are injured? Why is that good news for us? It is non-news for us. You just don't get it.

What I don't get is your liberal use of these pronouns. Who exactly are you speaking for? Do you represent every poster on RCF? When did the site elect you spokesman? Was the vote unanimous? If I had a vote, I most certainly would have cast it in a different direction.

Don't you find your comments about injured Bucks players blatantly disinguinuous considering that "WE" and "US" have a sticky dedicated to the health of relevant players? Are not your rivals relevant? Didn't "WE" and "US" also create a thread titled "Central Watch"....or perhaps that was one of the REAL voices of RCF that truly understands the intricacies of competion, imformation, and dialogue.
 
TJ'sDa1 said:
First, this is the internet and since there are no IP blocks on non-Cavs fans, then it isn't an "all Cavs site".

Secondly, I've talked about the Bucks, Cavs, and many other teams since I've been here so put the truth forth please.

Lastly, I didn't create this thread and on top of that, no one asked you to participate. If you don't like the content of 1 thread out of scores of threads, get out...it's that simple.

If you get "irritated" by the comments of a rival fan (even when what he says comes to pass) then that's an internal problem that YOU need to check. If you feel small or insecure, see a doctor. I'm a Bucks fan and you can't change that. When I speak, I will speak from the perspective of a Bucks fan while being fair and objective on serious issues. Did I get irritated and feel the need to surpress posters that claimed all offseason that Redd is one dimensional and less than Hughes, TJ Ford is an injury waiting to happen, Bogut will be a bust, the Bucks are not a deep team, the Cavs will sweep the Bucks, ect., ect.,.

I'm not claiming to be a victim at all. That's for the weak. I'll just continue to point out the hypocricies where they apply.

And you suggesting that I want YOUR attention....laughable. Since you want to put me in a box, I just take delight in watching and helping you contradict yourself. You come on here and tell people to ignore me and stop talking about the Bucks (a team that you're chasing) and yet, you still engage me in a meaningless dialouge. Believe me, I'm far beyond your ability to entrap, control, debate, one up, or whatever. If you persist, I will continue to put you in your place. So don't attempt to define the circumstances of my stay.

The arrogance is flowin like a river!
 
TJ'sDa1 said:
What I don't get is your liberal use of these pronouns. Who exactly are you speaking for? Do you represent every poster on RCF? When did the site elect you spokesman? Was the vote unanimous? If I had a vote, I most certainly would have cast it in a different direction.

Don't you find your comments about injured Bucks players blatantly disinguinuous considering that "WE" and "US" have a sticky dedicated to the health of relevant players? Are not your rivals relevant? Didn't "WE" and "US" also create a thread titled "Central Watch"....or perhaps that was one of the REAL voices of RCF that truly understands the intricacies of competion, imformation, and dialogue.

Talk about meaningless dialouge! :chuckles:

Anyways, you are probably right...Bucks players being injured is something to note, but say it is "good news" shows that you think we chalk that up as victory for us...like we are pleased because now are chances are going for win. I don't like players getting hurt...I like far competion. Why do you continue to put Cavs fans (us) in a box.

"Celebrate rejoice...players are injured...YAAAH!"

Don't put Cavs fans (us) in a box...such hypocrisy :chuckles:
 
Touche.

By the way, have you read the Joe Smith is injured thread. Apparently some Cavs fan that doesn't get it felt it necessary to create one. He must not have known that Rimage has decread that all Bucks injuries are irrelevant to Cavs fans. Great shall thy wrath be I'm sure. :chuckles:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-15: "Cavs Survive and Advance"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:15: Cavs Survive and Advance
Top