UNSTOPPABLEOn offense, Mitchell is about as good as you can get on offense for a 6’1” player - which is only an inch taller than the shortest height that an effective, impactful NBA player can be nowadays. At 6’1”, everything he does is harder to do. I’m so impressed.
You can’t just add height to guys without changing their game, and it’s all in theory, but how good would even a 6’4” Mitchell be?
It's way too early to make that statement.Wade will go down in history as the better player most likely, not saying different, But allot of Mitchell's game is similar.
Wade 2.0On offense, Mitchell is about as good as you can get on offense for a 6’1” player - which is only an inch taller than the shortest height that an effective, impactful NBA player can be nowadays. At 6’1”, everything he does is harder to do. I’m so impressed.
You can’t just add height to guys without changing their game, and it’s all in theory, but how good would even a 6’4” Mitchell be?
Yea-I found it comical when I was lurking on this forum months ago when people had the audacity to compare Sexton to Spida. I mean, 2 Sextons don't even equal DM. Let me ask you this...what would you prefer...3 Sextons or 1 Spida?Mitchell is in his physical prime. I’d imagine this would last another 4 or so years without significant injury.
Once he hits 30, maybe extend to 32, his game may need to change a little, but Garland will be in his physical prime at that point.
He’s really a treat to watch. What a trade.
You have Sexton #1 on Sexton #2's shoulders and #2 on #3. Triple stack. Somebody needs to photoshop that.How would you play three Sextons? It would be worse than one. The NBA doesn’t work that way
B
Wade 2.0
Of course I was talking about the great Dean WadeI assume we're talking Dean Wade here, in which case I'm 100% on board.
my comment was in jest. lol- Just a desperate attempt to make a pointHow would you play three Sextons? It would be worse than one. The NBA doesn’t work that way
Mitchell said it himself during the game last night that he is 6’3”, and the announcers pointed it out too.On offense, Mitchell is about as good as you can get on offense for a 6’1” player - which is only an inch taller than the shortest height that an effective, impactful NBA player can be nowadays. At 6’1”, everything he does is harder to do. I’m so impressed.
You can’t just add height to guys without changing their game, and it’s all in theory, but how good would even a 6’4” Mitchell be?