If it comes to this, we then chase Earl Watson or Steve Blake and utilise the extra space we have left over for assistance up front. We do not need a star at the point, just players who can fit the role.Cstyle said:Ever since the Jazz got in the running for Saras I've had a bad feeling that we're not going to get either of the two PGs we want. **sigh**
Ever since the Jazz got in the running for Saras I've had a bad feeling that we're not going to get either of the two PGs we want. **sigh**
Thank Ferry for doing such a bang up job so far. When Hughes was picked up, while I loved the signing to me it said we have to get a shooter at the point. Saras immediately rocketed to the top of my board. But with the addition of Donyell, that's not so much the case. You always want your point guard to be able to nail the wide open shot. That's a given. But now we don't have to have a dead eye gun slinging three point bomber at the point. If we can just get a good all around player, we should be ok.Karma said:We do not need a star at the point, just players who can fit the role.
I would prefer Gooden/AV at the 4 and Saras/Snow at the 1 to Marshall/AV at the 4 and Snow/Blake at the 1. That is annoying. I still think Marshall was a good signing, but it was a much better signing when we thought it was done with Saras already under wraps!CavsDawgsTribe said:Good thing we absolutely needed Donyell Marshall more then a PG[end sarcasm]
Before you make those comments you need to lay down all the facts and realise Blake will come for less dollars which will also allow us to sign another decent free agent.Cstyle said:I would prefer Gooden/AV at the 4 and Saras/Snow at the 1 to Marshall/AV at the 4 and Snow/Blake at the 1. That is annoying. I still think Marshall was a good signing, but it was a much better signing when we thought it was done with Saras already under wraps!