sorry David but talking about statistics rating intelligence and crime rates then using those statistics to show there is no racial divide .... can certainly be construed as racism.
especially when you know IQ scores are more a product of environment than actual intelligence.
The research you keep referencing doesn't show that blacks as a clture are more prone to violence because they aren't as smart as more affluent whites.
only shows the reasons for the divide need to be addressed.
and people stop responding to you not because " You win" they either get bored or see it as pointless to continue the discussion or they don't feel te need to have the last word and let their prior post stand on their own.
after spending a few weeks harping on intelligence you then start arguing that whites are victims of racism. Its a pattern. the posters on here are regular posters they don't just remember your last 2 post.
You personally might not be racist but some of your statements and data interpretation is the same stuff typically heard from the Aryan Nation.
i dont understand how you guys dont understand basic logic.
all racists wear shoes. all shoes are therefore racist. all people who wear shoes are racist.
this is aproblematic way to look at things. its not even just problematic, its demonstrably stupid. its unintelligent. and that isnt MY problem, that is a problem within YOU. if you cant understand somethign that simple, it speaks to your character, not mine.
there are facts. Good people use facts and bad people use facts.
especially when you know IQ scores are more a product of environment than actual intelligence.
actually, no. thats not been concluded. there is disagreement, and most researchers say there is at least 50% heritability in intelligence, and many go up to 80%.
talking about statistics rating intelligence and crime rates then using those statistics to show there is no racial divide .... can certainly be construed as racism.
sorryk what are you referring to here? be specific, because when you cloud peoples statements up and 'paraphrase' them, you paraphrase them completely out of the persons actual opinion. no, that isnt my fault. its YOURS. and its either 1. dishonest or 2. faulty logic.
The research you keep referencing doesn't show that blacks as a clture are more prone to violence because they aren't as smart as more affluent whites
thats great! because i never made the argument that it does. so you have just proved my point that it wasnt at all an argment that I made. at all. so stop propagating the
egregious lie that I made a racist argument that I didnt make. or iintend to make. and stop getting mad at an argument i didnt make.
i actually didnt reference any research. what research are you claiming i 'keep referring to'? you wanna show your work before I call you a liar as well?
and people stop responding to you not because " You win" they either get bored or see it as pointless to continue the discussion or they don't feel te need to have the last word and let their prior post stand on their own.
well i dont know what youre addressing. me and cavatt? cavatt makes awful points consistently and exclusively and ignores my points and continues to make claims that have already been answered by the points I've made. and then he makes up a bunch of arguments that i didnt make like 'property and guns' and claims i talk about it all the time (what a pattern) and that its not new. yea ok, its also not my argument. so why am I bothering to talk to someone who doesnt show the even the lowest amount of respect and has shown that he cant understand my position time and time again?
after spending a few weeks harping on intelligence you then start arguing that whites are victims of racism. Its a pattern. the posters on here are regular posters they don't just remember your last 2 post.
im not sure what you mean here bud. Those two things are related how? i just showed you 30 articles of anti white racism. rather than addressing the point, you use it as a case for racism. thats rich. why cant you just respond to the
obvious existence of racism? how does your brain turn that into
dave is a racist because he is providing evidence of anti white racism? like
what the actual fuck, are you kidding me?
tell me how the argument that 'all white people are privileged and all black people are the victims of racism' is any different than 'there is an acceptance of anti white racism''? and when considering the difference, you conclude that the LATTER argument, which is evidenced with logic, reasoning and empirical data, is racist and the first one isnt racist and you have yet to provide data to support it.
How are you able to say "black ppl are victim of racism" without having to provide any evidence whatsoever, and when i provide blatant examples of racism to support the claim that "white people are victims of racism" that is somehow racism? It is literally the same statement but with the color of skin switched, and evidence was supported for one of them. This.. Lacks principle. Entirely. Obviously. You do realize youre saying its ok to claim racism against one group of people but not another based on th3 color of their skin? Do you really not know that that is literally racism?