Slingin' Sammy "Super Soaker" Merrill

[Don-no-vann!]

Has anyone heard an update on Allen? Any estimate of when he will be ready to play?

 

[ryanf]

The issues with Mitchell and Garland in the backcourt have been far far less about defense and far more about offense.

If Garland remains next year, have to find a way for both his mindset and the offense scheme to make him more a 8-10 3PA volume shooter than trying to remain as a classic PG offensive orchestrator n a team where Mitchell frankly thrives better and the team seems to thrive more with Mitchell in that role. In other words, reduce (but not eliminate) the amount of possessions where DG runs the point while they’re both on the floor and then essentially stagger the minutes so he’s the backup PG, running the point when Mitchell sits for 12mpg in the regular season and 6mpg in the postseason

I actually think DG should play 2 guard more. Be like steph, give up the ball early and run through a battery of screens for a 3.

 

[Mr. Glass]

I actually think DG should play 2 guard more. Be like steph, give up the ball early and run through a battery of screens for a 3.

He seemed willing to do it when the Magic went big without Gary Harris. I think it's a great counter to "just put size on Garland" but agree we should see that more.

 

[Douglar]

Merrill was huge today. Without him, they likely collapse in the first half.

Boston presents a much better series of matchups for him in my opinion. Less perimeter offense to go at him on defense, and there's a similar quality of athletes coming off Boston's bench. I hope Sam gets some real run against them.

He pretty much saved Bickerstsff’s job for a few more days, yet it seems unlikely he’ll get floor time in the next two games.

 

[jmilo]

I actually think DG should play 2 guard more. Be like steph, give up the ball early and run through a battery of screens for a 3.

I think Steph's tougher than Darius. I can't imagine Garland actually getting a shot off after taking a beating running through screens like that.

I envision him hitting the backboard like he did from the corner.

Garland is best bringing the ball up and seeing the floor in front of him. He just needs to figure out his mental game. He's still one of the best players in the game when it comes to the pull-up three.

 

[bushwick_bill]

 

[bushwick_bill]

 

[bleedwineandgold03]

This kid needs minutes what a flamethrower. If a game 7 performance shows he needs to see the court then idk what will

 

[Kouki]

Fans should be in charge of rotations.

I love the crowd reaction too. His threes just hit different. Probably because everyone understands if he hits one, it's potentially a Really Big Deal. He's either going to hit 5 more, or the defense has to play ball denial. Win/win.

 

[2 For The Brew]

Fans should be in charge of rotations.

LOL. Back in the day fans would’ve played Dinner Bell Mel (RIP) over Brad Daugherty. The claim was that Brad was “soft”. Never mind that Mel looked like the Pumpernickel Pillsbury Doughboy out there.

 

[guitarguy]

The amount of gravity this guy has...it will be interesting if Boston slags on him at all... i bet they won't.

 

[Lee]

The amount of gravity this guy has...it will be interesting if Boston slags on him at all... i bet they won't.

They have great defenders, Boston is arguably the best defensive team in the NBA, He will be in there with Houser and Pritchard, need to take advantage of the defense of the backups because there starters are solid defensively at every position although no longer have a shot blocker.

 

[David.]

Do we have significant data on lineups with dg 1 Mitch 2 vs mitch 1 Sammy 2?

 

[Kouki]

Do we have significant data on lineups with dg 1 Mitch 2 vs mitch 1 Sammy 2?

I don't know about precisely the positions, but DM/Merrill is 8th on the team in net rating at +9.4 (267 minutes across 33 games). Garland doesn't even appear on the list until 26th...with DM at +4.4.

The really interesting part is that DM/Merrill is 2nd on the team in DRTG, behind only Mobley/Wade, and ~49th in ORTG. Wtf.

 

[Pierre Pan]

Cavs' Sam Merrill thrives next to Donovan Mitchell, but those minutes are hard to create — The Athletic

If Cleveland has any chance at beating Boston, it needs to match the top-seeded Celtics shot for shot in this series.

apple.news

As Cleveland Cavaliers players and staff walked off the floor at Oracle Arena following Game 2 of the 2017 NBA Finals, I bumped into then-general manager David Griffin. The Cavs had just forced 20 turnovers, shot 45 percent and scored 113 points — and lost to the Golden State Warriors by 19.

“You have to play a perfect game to beat them,” I said.

He paused for a second and nodded.

“Yeah,” he said.

The Cavs had fallen into an 0-2 hole that night. They lost the series in five games.

As good as they are, these Boston Celtics aren’t those 2017 Kevin Durant-led Warriors. However, these Cavs certainly aren’t the 2017 Cleveland version, either. As I watched Game 1 of this Eastern Conference semifinal Tuesday, it took me back to that brief conversation seven years ago. These Cavaliers will have to play their absolute best basketball just to compete with the Celtics in this series, which continues Thursday.

I thought the Cavs played better Tuesday than they did for most of the series against the Orlando Magic. They still lost Game 1 by 25 points. Jayson Tatum, Boston’s best player, struggled through an off shooting night, and the Celtics didn’t even notice.

The Cavs have shot so poorly from 3 in these playoffs that I contend they should attack the paint early in these games and try to get easy baskets and get to the free-throw line. This may sound counterintuitive given Boston’s 3-point barrage throughout this postseason. But Boston doesn’t really have shot blockers — so create easy looks, particularly on the road. Then worry about the 3-point line as guys get into a rhythm and the game evolves. Donovan Mitchell acknowledged to me after Game 7 against the Magic that was exactly his mindset. He took one early 3, missed and spent the rest of the quarter getting to the paint. This is a much different series, but easy 2s are still more productive than missed 3s.

It’s nonetheless evident that, eventually ,the Cavs are going to have to make a barrage of 3-pointers at some point to compete in this series. The Miami Heat launched 43 3-pointers against Boston in their lone first-round victory. They made 23 of them. The problem is the Cavs are the second-worst 3-point shooting team (by percentage) in these playoffs. They’re missing 22 a night.

Four of the bottom six teams in 3-point percentage were eliminated in the first round. The two that remain are the Cavs and the Denver Nuggets, who are buried in an 0-2 hole heading to Minnesota.

If the Cavs have any chance at matching Boston shot for shot, they probably need their best 3-point shooters on the floor regardless of what deficiency it creates on the defensive end. I wasn’t sure how well Sam Merrill fit against the Magic, but he fits in this series against Boston when every 3 is critical to survival. Merrill played 17 minutes against the Celtics in Game 1 and didn’t make a shot. It’s unfortunate but not enough reason to go away from him despite the fact he was a minus-14.

The Cavs need Merrill, but it’s not that simple. The Cavs need Merrill on the floor alongside Mitchell.

Certain players command so much attention and gravitational pull on a court that it makes things easier for those around them. That’s exactly what Mitchell does for Merrill. The numbers prove it.

The Cavs had a net rating of 9.4 when Merrill and Mitchell shared the floor during the regular season. When Merrill was paired with Darius Garland, that net rating fell to minus-2.3. (Those statistics included 17 minutes in which the trio played together.) That’s nearly a 12-point swing per 100 possessions. Those trends have remained steady in the small sample size of the playoffs, with the Cavs’ offense, in particular, benefiting from the Mitchell-Merill pairing compared to the Mitchell-Garland pairing.

If Merrill is going to play — and he needs to in a series in which the Cavs need every 3 they can create — his minutes should come alongside Mitchell whenever possible.

The Cavs are reticent to play Merrill, Mitchell and Garland together because it leaves the Cavs too small and vulnerable defensively. With J.B. Bickerstaff trying to play Garland and Mitchell together more during the postseason, it has crimped Merrill’s availability.

Maybe this series gets to the point Bickerstaff breaks the glass and plays all three. It might be a death knell defensively, but the Cavs are likely to face pressure points in this series when they have to get as much shooting on the floor as possible. Inevitably, there will be a moment when it’s time to get weird.

For all of his problems this season, Garland has been this team’s best 3-point shooter this postseason. Merrill is second. Mitchell has been terrible from 3, but taking him off the floor is non-negotiable.

It leaves Bickerstaff and the Cavs in the difficult position of seeking ways to get Merrill more involved. His two 3-pointers in the second quarter of Game 7 against Orlando very well may have saved their season. That’s the upside he provides.

In fairness, Merrill went 0-for-4 from 3 in Game 1 at Boston, and all of those shots came while playing alongside Mitchell. The Merrill-Mitchell pairing lasted six minutes, with a neutral plus-minus. Merrill played nine minutes alongside Garland in Game 1 and generated a minus-15. They shot 1 of 11 together.

It was an off night for Merrill, which happens with young/inexperienced players in pressure situations like the playoffs, particularly on the road. It might be why Bickerstaff has been slow to trust Merrill at times the last few weeks. But against the team averaging the most 3s of anyone this postseason, the Cavs have little choice.
Even though the reality is it still might not be enough.