Rich
Saucin'
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2010
- Messages
- 45,782
- Reaction score
- 70,370
- Points
- 148
No, I had no idea where you were going. We are discussing the possible mvp candidates and you go into a thing about depth and wins in the playoffs with only 8 guys. I just don't know how that factored in to the conversation.Basically you have nothing to counter, so you come back with condescending response.
I was just answering the question you appeared to be asking.
And Durant's numbers aren't good enough? Please... He's 54/40/86 while averaging 25.9 points per game. Do you honestly think Westbrook, Harden, or even Curry could ever do that while being that efficient?
He's averaging 25.9 points per game with a TS of 65%. That's pretty absurd. Westbrook and Harden, players you think are better, don't even come close to that efficiency.
As for his numbers, no, they won't be good enough. Him being efficient isn't enough. Not to overcome the stigma of who he's playing with. Telling me he's more efficient than Harden and Westbrook as some sort of deciding factor is crazy. He doesn't have to do nearly as much as those 2.
Speaking of, Westbrook dominated again tonight. Okc is now 20-12. Guy above said Durant could do what Westbrook is doing on a team lacking talent because he has done it. I say no. Ibaka was on that team with Durant while Westbrook was hurt. Westbrook has a good player in Steven Adams, and then nothing but regular guys. Its time to start looking at his 40+% usage rate and marvel. Its clearly not hurting his team.
Right now it's between he and harden. LeBron is 3rd and I'm not sure Durant is top 5.