Scar4343
Semper Fidelis
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2006
- Messages
- 317
- Reaction score
- 576
- Points
- 93
I don't know how we have so many mind readers in here.
Notice in my post how I leave their intent to injure out of it. There is no possible way in hell of knowing whether or not Olynyk intended to injure Love or whether or not Smith intended to injure Crowder. What they intended was to commit the act which resulted in the injury.
OK, and your point is irrelevant... not knowing whether they intended to injure is the same as they didn't intend to injure because I'd assume that you would treat lack of knowledge of intent as lack of intent. How else would you treat it? OK, so modify my post to say, "it is not clear that either player intended to injure the other guy but both intentionally made reckless plays". Does this change my point at all? No. Were you being a dick for the sake of being a dick? Yes. You said "what they intended was to commit the act which resulted in the injury" which is pretty much exactly what I said two words after what you bolded and was the whole fucking point of my post.