so basically you're saying the article is a few months early, because things are going to come to a head this off-season for better or for worse due to trades, the draft, free agency, coach/gm hirings, etc. and that's certainly true.my point is the 2014/15 Cavs could have like 6-7 new players and predicting Kyrie's future now is tough without knowing who those players are gonna be. let's say once Lebron turns us down we use our assets and make 2 big trades then all of this stuff that's written now will become irrelevant...our core would look totally different and Kyrie might like that team moving forward (compared to what we have now).
firing Mike Brown and hiring a better coach might also appease him...
Kyrie leaves and I truly might be done with NBA basketball...what is going to make another star stay with us long-term?
There are those who even wonder whether Irving is truly worth a maximum-level contract, including some within the Cavs organization.
I'm glad this conversation is being held within the organization. It's a very necessary question. If you're gonna get 30% of your team's cap, and you haven't sniffed 30 wins, there's something wrong there. Now, that brings up the whole chicken and egg (great player but bad teammates/system so don't blame him) debate. And that's the exact question the FO should be asking themselves right now.
I'm not against resigning hiim by any means, I'm just for discussing all the options. I know he's a young star on the up and up, but questioning his true value isn't heresy.
so basically you're saying the article is a few months early, because things are going to come to a head this off-season for better or for worse due to trades, the draft, free agency, coach/gm hirings, etc. and that's certainly true.
but also keep in mind the likelihood of those events, particularly the ones re: lebron and potentially pulling off a mega blockbuster. those would certainly have massive ramifications on his decision, but they are also the least feasible. so espn is basically saying "well.....this is the current situation, and it can change, but judgement day is rapidly approaching."
i don't know, i just don't think it's really all that premature due to the situation, the significance of the player involved, and the relatively short-ish timeline. if they were pulling this shit a year ago, it's way different. but a few months early during the lull between the deadline/end of season, especially when the situation is not particularly positive? eh, just doesn't seem like the biggest deal in the world.
finally, that comment about what is being said in private - whether it is accurate or just BS made up by people with an agenda in his camp - is terrifying.
that was obv slight hyperbole.It's a sport. Nothing should be terrifying.
Shouldn't be afraid anymore of a player wanting to leave. They should know how to handle this now. If he tries to get a deal where he has an early opt out, trade him. Not tough.
If this team were on the upswing, then I'd be worried about this. But you know, I gotta say, a dude threatening to leave when he hasn't won 30 games in 3 years...yea, not that terrifying. People will be saying "but we'll have to start over!!!" Ugh, we haven't got out of the fucking starting blocks yet.