Shouldn't we be looking at more than just 'if he continues winning' when discussing this from a long term perspective? Does the level of QB play that's been shown so far lead people to believe that winning is sustainable?
Again I will state that Hoyer is almost certainly the best option on the roster, but to say he's played mistake free ball is not true. He hasn't turned the ball over (although his int rate as a starter with the Browns also does not look to be sustainable) but he has taken costly sacks (Pitt) and badly missed receivers. The completion percentage and yards per attempt both paint him in an unfavorable light despite playing two porous defenses.
What's wrong with saying Hoyer should continue to start until a better option presents itself, be that through the draft, free agency, a trade, or whatever.
But the Hoyer hate seems crazy to me.
I think the Hoyer hate was latent in the Manziel thread for the past few months, then was absolutely present in the game threads. I was a vocal supporter of Hoyer in the first preseason game, then shut my mouth until last Sunday because I was elated the Browns were entertaining again and had no idea why I was still reading posts that were critical and suggested Manziel should still start after the bye week.
That said, we are still living in a world where the opponent doubles Miles Austin in passing situations and forces Jim Dray and Gary Barnridge to beat the defense in order to move the chains. That sounds like an Arena lineup. In fact, our most dangerous weapon, Hawkins, was an Arena League veteran who accepted a scout position with the Lions before getting a break with Cincinnati.
I agree, hands off the great hide tanner from Kentucky. But Jim Dray sounds like the fat white guy in his mid-40s who delivered my pizza last Saturday night.
That would be me, i lost my 200k a year job.
Jim Dray is definitely Lee's hastily made up alias until he gets a corporate job back.
"Hey Lee, did I see you using food stamps to buy Velveeta and a 30 pack of Keystone Light at Safeway yesterday?"
"Nope, that was my neighbor...Jim Dray. Everyone says he looks exactly like me."
I don't get the whole "our QB is only average to solid, so that means our team is mediocre too" argument..
Russell Wilson just won a Super Bowl living off of not making mistakes, having a great running game, terrific play calling, and a top of the line D.. yet, because we're the Browns, that can't happen with us?
Wilson has averaged all of 25 passing attempts per game throughout his career. Would he have the same amount of success if he doesn't had to throw more often?
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying we're as good as Seattle in any way, shape, or form, or that Hoyer is better than Russell Wilson, but if you build your team the right way, you don't need a top of the line QB who throws 40 times per game to win it all.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying we're as good as Seattle in any way, shape, or form, or that Hoyer is better than Russell Wilson, but if you build your team the right way, you don't need a top of the line QB who throws 40 times per game to win it all.