godfather
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 39,133
- Reaction score
- 35,153
- Points
- 148
Maybe it's just a (over)reaction to everyone claiming that they rushed him/didn't take his previous injury seriously?
I don't think it necessarily has to be an indictment on the status of his recovery.
I'd buy that, if they said this closer to the start of the regular season, but it's too strange to say this in August. They've not even come to training camp yet.
But maybe the Cavs are over exaggerating, and they really think it's going to be a couple a weeks (after the start of the season). But said till Jan as worst case scenario. Being not only cautious with Kyrie, but being cautious with publicly releasing the time table, too.
It's just odd to me, to project a guy being possibly out for another 2 months, just to be safe, if he's moving along just fine in rehab.
How can they know how he'll be in two months from now, to feel certain it's best to take another 2 months, just to be "safe"? That's just too extreme!
You'd push him back two weeks, if you want to be safe, after he's 110 cleared to play and back to full health. 2 months is extreme.
Especially given the Cavs released the statement they want 'Bron play fewer minutes this season. You can't do that with Kyrie out that long. It just doesn't add up to me.