He made good plays, bad plays, and plays where he just threw a screen which I would expect anyone to make accurately. I think his bad plays outweighed his good ones, but his skills players played extremely well and we exploited matchups and got the victory.
That's my definition of below average to average. He had elite stats, but in the context of the game I thought the gameplan, YAC, and Gary Barnidge made his stats look far better than his actual play. You can disagree with me all you want, but he failed my eye test for a playoff caliber QB - which is what I would like us to have. For me "played well" doesn't mean exceeding low expectations set by years of futility, it means playing on the level of the top half of the league, and I don't think he did that. I think his skill players did though, and they should be getting the credit and we should have higher expectations from anyone who plays QB for us.
@Chris I never said I expected perfection. In fact if you actually tried reading the words I actually wrote, I said it was a positive that he only threw one pass that should have been intercepted and that was great because all NFL QB's throw a few of those per game. I do however want people to stop being happy with just being better than Spergeon Wynn, because we need a lot more than what McCown is giving us to beat teams who are actually good.
edit: though I'm freaking ecstatic he's playing well enough to keep Manziel off the field, even if I don't think he's playing well.
If his bad plays outweighed his good ones, I'm pretty sure we'd have lost. The more you type, the less sense this makes. Just my opinion. I did actually read your post, believe it or not, and I thought it was silly stuff. You imply I didn't try to read your post...last I checked, you said McCown played below average. Which I took issue with. Did you not say that?
I mean, keep talking about Spergeon Wynn, but...the guy just had a better day than any Browns quarterback in history. Nitpick his throws however you want. That fact remains. I haven't heard anybody say he is the future, or he is the answer to all our quarterback woes because I'm sure he won't play like that every game or even close to it. But he did on Sunday.
Also, 400+ yards passing with 2 TDs/1 rush TD should be good enough vs anybody, even "good teams." Not saying he is going to put up those numbers vs Denver and Arizona, simply replying to your statement that the Browns will need "more" against good teams.
Anyway, gonna have to agree to disagree on this. Don't think anyone is trumpeting McCown as the savior, me least of all. But I do think he played a heck of a game Sunday and is the biggest reason the Browns won.
I think his bad plays outweighed his good ones, but his skills players played extremely well and we exploited matchups and got the victory.
That spiral just wasn't tight enough man.
"Pro Football Focus: The most reliable set of metrics since ESPN's Total QBR!"Ive been done with this since yesterday.
Given it all I have explaining the PFF grades, I actually think McCown did a fine job of managing the game. Credit where it's due, McCown did what he needed to do and the defense didn't take advantage of his mistakes.
I think the McCown train dies this week. I don't think he's a good QB, just that he's been playing well for us. Well enough for us to win. He's not been this awesome QB by any means, just been good enough to win you games.
I am pretty sure 95% of us will be talking about the next QB on this team by Monday though.
Because the defense he's about to see, well, his limited skills are likely to get exposed pretty bad.
I am just curious to see how our shaky defense holds up against a struggling Manning. It should be a low score game, where we lose by in typical heartbreak fashion. Hopefully the weather is cold, Peyton doesn't like throwing in cold conditions.
Ive been done with this since yesterday.
Given it all I have explaining the PFF grades, I actually think McCown did a fine job of managing the game. Credit where it's due, McCown did what he needed to do and the defense didn't take advantage of his mistakes.
Not sure what @FiveThous is talking about. Can't formulate his own arguments, I suppose.
Essentially, the POV is that PFF is infallible in its grading of QBs and that if you don't understand/accept why great games get shitty grades, you're just plain dumb.
I just think these PFF grades for QBs being terrible after a good game by a QB should prompt PFF to look in the mirror a bit, rather than prompt them to try to force feed it to everyone as the be-all-end-all way to see it.