Bob_The_Cat
Gold Star Member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2010
- Messages
- 10,714
- Reaction score
- 16,353
- Points
- 123
I guess I've seen enough from the committee in two years that I don't think they are going to vote like normal pollsters do. The fact that they refused to drop Notre Dame below UNC is a REALLY big difference from what you get from your normal AP-type voter. Notre Dame lost this week, UNC didn't, but the committee didn't care. They continued to look at the body of work, not just the most recent week.
Knowing that, they were extremely ready to drop Florida State last season if only they had lost a game. They were very unimpressed with Florida State despite them being the defending champs. But Florida State never gave them the chance to drop them out of the rankings by being the only undefeated team in the country last season. I just don't know that they are going to be swayed by Ohio State's past success. We'll see.
Totally agree with everything 100%. People are somehow forgetting that even prior to the loss to MSU, a 10-0 OSU was ranked 3rd behind Clemson and a one loss Bama and was closely trailed by a 1 loss ND.
This was despite being undefeated, going into the season as the undisputed number one team in the country, having a coach with championship pedigree, a team lined with All-Americans and All-Big Ten players, and playing in the strongest conference this year in college football.
Clearly the committee doubted OSU after 10 weeks. Did they really do anything to change those doubts in the past two weeks? Is losing at home to a team missing their starting QB impressive? The way they beat Michigan is how they should have been beating teams all year. They have one quality win all season and it took 11 weeks to finally get it. People need to remove the blinders.
Last edited: