enigmatic
Recluse
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2008
- Messages
- 615
- Reaction score
- 705
- Points
- 93
@Chris Parker The biggest issue I have with NEOMG is the influence they carry, and how little they respect it.
To control the media is to control the mind. And for them to be focused on how close of friends LBJ/Love are rather than our PnR coverages, rotations, offensive sets etc. is doing their readers a disservice.
But in the TMZ era where the majority of the population thrives on inconsequential drama, what can you expect....
EDIT: But that's assuming they COULD analyze the game at an average level...which I seriously doubt.
This right here is the problem: they aren't smart enough for the X and O BBall questions, so they go for the gossip mongering. They are essentially gossip columnists masquerading as sports reporters, and they do no one in their profession any favors when they consistently go for the lowest common denominator is their articles and questions.
We don't need anymore Skip Bayless/Screamin A Smith/Booms/Goldhammers in sports journalism; we need much, much less. But conflict/rumour mongering gets $$$ for these guys and their companies, so here we are.
I've got no problems w/ guys like Jason Lloyd or even Chris Haynes (who I think is still finding his way as a Cavs beat reporter)because even when I don't agree w/ their takes it's at least coming from a sound basketball background and especially in Lloyd's case, a solid explanation where they're coming from in their takes.
The ESPN/TMZ styled garbage has done much more harm than anything else regarding good journalism.