- Joined
- Sep 1, 2006
- Messages
- 10,308
- Reaction score
- 23,679
- Points
- 135
I sort of see Porter as Shane Battier. Can hit a corner three, create some shots, defend multiple positions, and relies more on basketball IQ rather than raw athleticism. Nice player to have but not a player that will wow you.
While that comparison is going to be out there because Porter looks like he can do almost all of the all the stuff that Battier can do, I think there are several areas where Porter is better than Battier.
Porter is a crafty call handler and can beat one man off the dribble. That's not in Battier's arsenal.
Porter has a very strong pull up mid-range game. Battier isn't able to get himself into position to try that very often.
Porter also looks like he could be a significantly better rebounder. Battier's good at a lot of things, but he's an average rebounder for his size.
Here's the pre-draft comparison for people that want to compare, but remember that Battier was 3 years older than Porter when he was drafted.
Player | Height w/o Shoes | Weight | Wingspan | Standing Reach | No Step Vert | Max Vert | Lane Agility | 3/4 Court Sprint |
Battier | 6' 8.25" | 229 | 6' 10.5" | 8' 9" | 29.5 | 33 | 10.95 | 3.3 |
Porter | 6' 7.5" | 198 | 7' 1.5" | 8' 9.5" | 27 | 36 | 11.25 | 3.4 |
<tbody>
</tbody>
Last edited: