Let me try to help.
I said "And I think it was SUCH a poor decision it certainly contributed to Grant being fired." - which clearly indicates I hold Grant accountable for this decision. After all, why would I believe someone should be fired for something unless they were responsible for it?
Then you said "Been said about 27 times that that move was Gilbert's idea." - which implies- nay, straight out states - that I somehow didn't think this was Grant's idea- and did not in any way directly respond to my comment.. so, Huh?
And I then said in response "Of course it was Grant's idea. Did I indicate that it wasn't? What I said was that this decision contributed to his demise."
I'm struggling to understand what was unclear about that to you. This is a really odd tangent we are on now. Admit you read something wrong and move on.