• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Garnett Trade

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

CleveRocks

There go the Cavs!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
8,687
Reaction score
7,078
Points
113
ESPN.com has a one liner about the Sheridan Blog on a possible trade for Garnett. "Cavs, Nets and Bulls among teams expected to deal". It is an ESPN insider which I do not have. Can anybody find more detail? :confused:
 
Pistons, Knicks shopping for KG?
posted: Monday, November 21, 2005

Get ready for the Kevin Garnett trade rumors, the first of which was quickly shot down Sunday by Kevin McHale and Joe Dumars -- even as others maintained it was legit.
Both team executives denied there was any truth to talk that made its way around the league over the weekend that the Detroit Pistons were willing to ship a package including Rasheed Wallace and Darko Milicic to Minnesota for Garnett.

The future of the 29-year-old eight-time All-Star came into question after Garnett's much-discussed interview Thursday night on TNT. Garnett criticized McHale for his handling of the Timberwolves during the troubled 2004-05 season in which Flip Saunders was fired and McHale took over as head coach.

Dumars insisted he had not been in contact with the Wolves regarding Garnett, and McHale also dismissed the rumor, which came as executives from others teams were trying to gauge whether the Timberwolves would seriously consider dealing the franchise player who has been with Minnesota throughout his entire 10-year NBA career. Team owner Glen Taylor told reporters in Minnesota that Garnett has "never, ever" sought a trade.

"We're not trading Garnett," McHale said Sunday night.

The prevailing opinion around the league is that Minnesota, barring a sustained nosedive prior to the All-Star break, would not consider trading Garnett before next summer. With a record of 5-4 following their victory over Charlotte on Saturday night, the Wolves are in first place in the Northwest Division.

Garnett is under contract for $18 million this season, then will make $21, $22 and $23 million over the next three years. With Wally Szczerbiak under contract for an equal number of years ($10 million this season, $11, $12 and $13 million the next three), the Timberwolves would have very little salary cap flexibility for the next half-decade unless they jettisoned their two highest-paid players. Minnesota already has a forward, Mark Madsen, and three guards, Marko Jaric, Troy Hudson and Trenton Hassell, signed at least through the 2009-10 season.

One source told ESPN.com that the New York Knicks had made Minnesota an offer that included the expiring contracts of Penny Hardaway ($15.7 million) and Antonio Davis ($13.9 million). But for such a trade to work under salary cap rules, the Knicks would also have to take back Sczcerbiak. While that deal would be stunningly lopsided talent- wise, it would relieve the Wolves of $102 million in salary obligations over the next three seasons, allowing them to enter the 2006 offseason with approximately $25 million of cap space.

One source close to several NBA players insisted that the viability of the Knicks' offer should not be dismissed, going so far as to say Garnett was making a private push through back channels to be dealt to New York and reunite with former teammate Stephon Marbury.

"I'd bet money he'll be wearing a Knicks uniform by the end of February," the source said.

Another source insisted Detroit's offer of Wallace and Milicic was real, adding that the offer was made through another Pistons official so that Dumars could maintain deniability in case the players came to him for an explanation.

The Nets have also been mentioned as a possible trade partner in a Garnett deal, but it is believed the Wolves would consider a deal with New Jersey only if they could get back Richard Jefferson, whose status as a base-year compensation player under salary cap rules makes him exceedingly difficult to deal. The best offer the Nets could make this season would include Vince Carter, another player (Nenad Krstic?, Mile Ilic?) and a pair of No. 1 picks (their own and the Clippers').

Sounds really silly if you ask me. I doubt management has lost hope. It's the beginning of the season. If a trade is to occur, it would be right at the deadline, to see how things pan out.


To the Cavs? Who would we have to give up to get Garnett? Z, Hughes, Marshall and Jones can't be traded yet, LeBron won't be going anywhere, anytime.

Gooden, Jackson, Pavlovic, Newble, Snow, Varejao... that would be a nutty trade. No matter who we trade out of that bunch we'll be on the bright end of the deal.
 
The Cleveland Cavaliers entry: Luke Jackson/Sasha Pavlovic/Eric Snow. There isn't enough room in a tight Cavs rotation for the two backups, Jackson and Pavlovic, and both have been showcased by a team that has stormed out of the gate.
If the Cavs want to keep both youngsters, they can deal starter Eric Snow to New York for Malik Rose and make Damon Jones their starter. Rose and Snow are both under contract through '08-09. Knicks coach Larry Brown loves Snow, and Cavs general manager Danny Ferry is a fan of Rose, his former teammate, so it seems to make sense for both teams.

Would we really want Malik Rose? Doubt it.
Silly speculation. We have a great team already, we're not going to mess with it.
 
I agree that it does not make sense, but I wonder what they are thinking we would trade to get Garnett. IMO, it would have to be a Gooden/Sasha/Ira trade to make the numbers work.

Even though that seems lopsided for us, if garnett is unhappy, it is a way to get value for him and start the rebuilding process in MN. Let me ask, would you give up these three and a first rounder for KG?

You would have to admit, such a trade would put us right on top to win it all.
 
Okay... If you are Minny, what would you prefer ?

Any combination Sasha, Luke, Drew, Snow, AV, 1st rounder.

or

Jermaine O'neal and Tinsley ? (which has been rumored)

;) Nuff said.
 
we're not going to mess up an 8-2 team with a trade with the knicks and we don't have anything to trade for KG.
 
So if KG winds up in Indiana, does that really change anything for us? bigger probelms if he winds up in chicago or New York as he makes either team significantly better.
 
Who here would trade Z/Gooden for Garnett?

Z/Hughes?

Gooden/Hughes/Snow/Pav?


(Our newly signed/re-signed guys can be traded very soon (3 months from the time they're signed, I think))
 
As much as I would like a player as good as Garnett, I don't think I want to change anything right now. Everything so far looks like is perfect. Can you really make "perfect" even better? I dunno, but I am seriously on the fence here.

Plus, we we got another high scorer, wouldn't we be turning into this year's HEAT? All scorers, but only one ball to go around.
 
It would be different than the Heat.

3 distributors in LeBron, Garnett, and Hughes... both can average 5-6 assists a game. Keep Z, Jones and Marshall, at least

Z
Garnett
James
Hughes
Jones

Marshall
Henderson
Newble
Wilks
Hamilton

Nutty lineup right there. 4 all-star calibur players, 2 MVP candidates.... on one team?
 
You have to be stupid not to look into a trade for Garnett. LeBron, Larry and Kevin on the same court would be unstoppable.
 
Really though... who could stop that offense?

Garnett starts on the top of the key. LeBron and Larry on the wings. Z in the low post, and Jones in the opposite corner.

Not to mention the astronomically improved interior defense with the arrival of Garnett.

But it won't happen. :bigcry:
 
lyXo beat me to the punch, but I just wanted to emphasize that Garnett is a 1st Team All-Defense player. He's a monster on D, has a killer will to win, and is all about ball movement and sharing the rock.

Adding Garnett is hardly similar to the Heat adding Antoine Walker and JWill.
 
For salaries to come anywhere close to matching the Cavaliers would have to include Z, and I doubt the T-Wolves would be very interested in Z if they're trading Garnett. As far as New York Isiah is involved in every trade rumor both good and bad.

I would think the Nets would be a good fit but if the T-Wolves would rather have Jefferson than Carter then that would seem to limit the deal. With that said I think the most realistic would be Chicago. They can offer an ending contract in Tim Thomas and then add in one of their guards (Hinrich, Duhon, Gordon) and then Sweetney and a pick or two.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top