Kouki
Kouki, Not Cookie.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2009
- Messages
- 10,875
- Reaction score
- 11,359
- Points
- 123
That right there is the worst possible thing a GM can do. You can't justify overpaying someone on the team because someone else on the team is already overpaid, you're just compounding the mistakes if you do that.
I honestly don't think Gee really improved much at all from last year to this year, he just played more minutes and got more shots. His efficiency went down across the board.
Sorry if I'm not falling over myself to give a guy who shot 41% from the field and 32% from three a four year deal. Gee's main value this season came from the fact he was making under a million bucks. If we more than quadruple his salary and commit to him for that long, I'd want someone who projects a little higher than "8th man on a good team" as you said.
Of course his efficiency went down, he was asked to do a lot more with the ball. At times he was our first option on offense.
I think you guys are crazy if you don't see how much he improved.
As for whether or not he's at his ceiling, that's pretty hard to say. He made a lot of improvement last year, who's to say he can't keep improving?
Sounds like someone might make a big offer to pry him away from the Cavs. I don't know if "overpaying" would be the worst thing we could do (assuming overpaying is 4 mil/year as some are saying). At worst, he doesn't improve and he stays a decent bench player with good defense and a good work ethic that can rub off on other guys. That's not a bad thing at 4 mil/year and I don't think it will really cripple us or be some ridiculously untradeable contract.