Haters are underestimating the value of love. He is an elite rebounder.... Love's rebounding has been better than i thought. To be 8th in the nba in rebounding while spending so much time away from the rim and playing with other good rebounders is incredible.
Love gets a lot of rebounds, yes. But at the team level the Cavs rebound percentages and margin look almost *identical* to last year. Last year we got 50.9% of available rebounds, with a margin of +1.6, tied for 10th in the league. So far this year we are getting 50.9% of available rebounds, with a margin of +1.5, and are standing at 8th in the league. So if we have added such an elite rebounder, where are the results at the team level? His presence on the team doesn't seem to be netting us any more than AV/Hawes/Zeller did last year. (Granted AV went down but we had him for part of the year this year, then we got Mozgov).
I don't think the results above would surprise people who watch the games; Love vacuums up a lot of boards but we don't look like a dominant rebounding team out there. Generally, Love's stats overall don't look so bad, with the exception of shooting percentages (33% from 3 is not as good as people are making it out to be -- it is below the league average). But when you watch him he just doesn't look or feel like someone playing at an elite level. Scoring wise it is not bad to average almost 17 points on 13 shots...but when do you ever feel in the fourth quarter that you can depend on Love's scoring to preserve a lead?
Anyway, I am rooting for the guy, and I think he's still an above average player overall. I just think that he needs to elevate his game if we are to truly reach championship level.