• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Kings Staying Put (was Sonics coming back)

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
How about the fact that Sterling did it.

What? Sterling was never sued by the NBA. The NBA never mandated that the Clippers stay in a particular city, as is what's happening now. You're grasping at straws here.
 
He wasn't sued because they knew they didn't have a case!
KEEP UP
GETTING SICK OF THIS
DONE

LET'S FUCKING VOTE
DONE
 
Whats funny is if Hansen and Ballmer sue,They will be suing all 29 other owners of the league. Not exactly wise to go nuclear with Billionares on the other side.

Keep in mind Paul Allen is one of those owners. He has just as much money as Ballmer and could probably tell him to pull out with his Microsoft connection...
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Via @<a href="https://twitter.com/art_thiel">art_thiel</a>, source said original relocation committee vote was 4-3 against; dissenters asked to change votes for unanimity <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23NBA">#NBA</a></p>&mdash; Aaron Levine (@AaronQ13Fox) <a href="https://twitter.com/AaronQ13Fox/status/333090139368730624">May 11, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Fun stuff. Greatest storyline since Jordan.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Via @<a href="https://twitter.com/art_thiel">art_thiel</a>, source said original relocation committee vote was 4-3 against; dissenters asked to change votes for unanimity <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23NBA">#NBA</a></p>— Aaron Levine (@AaronQ13Fox) <a href="https://twitter.com/AaronQ13Fox/status/333090139368730624">May 11, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Fun stuff. Greatest storyline since Jordan.

Might be true. We might never know. I don't know the tweeter btw so I can't comment. Thing with the media is there have been reports of a 5-2 vote as well. Regardless it got reported by the Nba as 7-0
 
My question here is if the money in the offer is actually increasing, or if simply the valuation of the franchise is increasing because the Seattle group is buying less of the Kings(% wise) now for the same amount of money that they originally offered.

For example, the original deal was supposedly 65% for 341m dollars, which valued the team at 525m. So they recently added another 25m onto the bid, which means that they either added that much total cash, or now were only buying approx 62%. And now are they only buying 53% of the team or are they throwing in more money. Seems like it could be either way, but the insistence on the valuations being reported leads me to think they are just buying less of the team perhaps.

In theory, the 53% represents the amount of the franchise that the Maloofs own.
 
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Maloof family informs fellow owners they've cut a new deal for Kings if relocation bid to Seattle is rejected: <a href="http://t.co/vhpiPYW0x1" title="http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/9265605/sources-maloof-family-cuts-new-deal-sacramento-kings">espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id…</a></p>&mdash; Brian Windhorst (@WindhorstESPN) <a href="https://twitter.com/WindhorstESPN/status/333354504391127040">May 11, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

shit-just-got-real-o.gif
 
This whole Fiasco is making me laugh more than anything. Sure, keep the Kings in Sacramento again Maloofs. Retarded.
 
From Aaron Bruski. Maybe we'll know more on May 15 (scheduled vote). Or maybe not....


League source with intimate knowledge of the Kings transaction: "No matter how much they kick and scream, this is not about SEA's offer."

League sources maintain after today's media attack by the SEA/Maloof camp that the decision to relocate is about SAC's bid and not SEA’s.

On the contempt of SEA’s camp in spite of the NBA reko against relo, one high-level NBA source said “Ballmer is on a rampage right now.”

Source: “Ballmer is playing a game of Russian Roulette with SEA’s NBA future. He can’t throw money at the problem like this is Microsoft.”

More: Reports that the league has any real concern about SAC’s arena plan or ownership group are outright false.

Source: The idea that Hansen/Ballmer would own any portion of the Kings while they play in Sacramento is a “non-starter.”

Source on NBA using Best Interests of the League clause vs. Maloofs: The league "will use all options at its disposal to protect the logo.”

 
The problem to me in a nutshell....

Seattle's Key Arena was below NBA standards. The league basically said "Build a new arena or else". The politicos in Seattle balked and the team moved to OKC.

Sacramento had an agreement with the Maloofs for a new arena in Feb. of 2012. The Maloofs backed out in April of 2012, angering Stern in the process.

This is why the NBA (Stern) wants to keep the Kings in Sacramento. City council already had an agreement to build a new arena. Maloofs screwed the city in the process. It'll be hard for a current NBA owner to ask for a new arena, and get that approval if the owner decides, eh...never mind...I'm moving.

A stadium would never get built using taxpayers dollars again (maybe that's not a bad thing....)
 
from Windhorst:

A committee of NBA owners who have been studying the future of the Sacramento Kings met Monday but did not change their position to recommend the team be kept in Sacramento and not moved to Seattle, a source told ESPN.com.


A final full vote on the matter is expected at owners' meetings Wednesday in Dallas. It remains unclear, however, who will own the Kings after Wednesday's meetings.


A group led by Silicon Valley billionaire Vivek Ranadive, who has worked closely with NBA commissioner David Stern to keep the Kings in Sacramento and build a new arena for the team, is hoping to gain control of the team. The Maloof family, the Kings current owners, have told the league they don't plan to sell to Ranadive if the move is blocked.


To sort though all this, the owners' relocation and finance committees held a teleconference in the wake of several developments in the last week from the group that is trying to buy the Kings and relocate them to Seattle. Two weeks ago the relocation committee voted unanimously to block the move. It has been expected the rest of the owners would follow that recommendation.


Last week in a bid to change the owners minds, Seattle group lead investor Chris Hansen increased his offer for 65 percent of the Kings to a record $409 million from $358 million. He also offered a relocation fee payout of $4 million per team for a total of about $116 million to attempt to sweet the pot and sway owners who may be sitting on the fence.


Also last week the Maloofs told fellow owners if they blocked the move to Seattle they had a backup plan where they would instead sell a 20 percent share to Hansen's group and keep controlling interest in the team.


Such a sale would have to be approved by 75 percent of the owners and it's uncertain if the Maloofs would have enough support considering Hansen's goal clearly is to move the team to Seattle. However, the league cannot force the Maloofs to sell to Ranadive.


The NBA league office has negotiated its own backup deal with Ranadive that includes a purchase price of $341 million for the Kings, which would still set a record by valuing the entire team at $525 million.



Ranadive appears to have gotten the support of league owners because it has worked with local government officials to secure more than $250 million in funding for a new downtown arena. While his deal is less money and in a smaller market, the league has repeatedly shown an interest in making the Kings work in Sacramento being its first priority.


Though there have been concerns among owners over the hastily-formed Ranadive group and its arena deal, the group has met some recent benchmarks that have satisfied the league, sources said.


Their effort to sweeten the pot for other owners was to promise to reduce and eventually eliminate the revenue-sharing proceeds the Kings would be owned over the next few years, a giveback that will likely total in the tens of millions.


Through the process, the Hansen group and the Maloofs have generally worked around the league office and communicated directly with the owners who will vote on Wednesday.
 
I'm really not sure what the Maloof's fetish is with screwing over Sacramento. I wonder if they have a shrine dedicated to Art Modell?
 
This is going to be ugly no matter where the team ends up.
 
I'm really not sure what the Maloof's fetish is with screwing over Sacramento. I wonder if they have a shrine dedicated to Art Modell?

1) They are trying to drive up the price of the team one

2) The Maloof's are in a bad spot from a $$ and are going to try and milk every last cent they can out of this
 
I think its funny that Vivek Ranadive got called a Billionare in that article, yet Seattle fans keep saying he is worth 350 Million at best.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top