He shot 46% on threes last year for a very good playoff team. He's one of the greatest shooters of all time--he's not going to forget how to.shoot in one off season.
In this game, he also defended, got boards, and made some nice passes. He was a defensive liability for MEM last year so we know there are limitations but put in the right places, he can help us.
Is it just me, or is it painfully obvious that the lineup at the end of the game was basically the audition for the new starting lineup.
Can't imagine it will be much longer before we we the starting lineup with Bron, KI, Love, TT and Miller. Makes the most sense.
The unit we have is providing to be a crutch for Lebron and Kyrie and we are winning in spite of it.I don't necessarily agree with that idea. I don't like the thought of putting all offense in the starting lineup. The unit we have going is starting to get some good chemistry and is stepping up defensively.
Not quite sure why you'd say that. Some of Andy's best years were off the bench, and in fact, his breakout year over the last few was the year we drafted Kyrie. No Lebron anywhere. If Andy hadn't gotten hurt that year, he was a serious candidate for a coaches' vote into the All Star game.I say you gotta start Andy with LeBron because without Bron Andys effectiveness will drop. With Lebron he's a threat for 20. If he plays without Lebron he can still score but he's not nearly as scary