LeShaq
All-Star
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2009
- Messages
- 4,072
- Reaction score
- 8,109
- Points
- 113
Would you say that's a result of us actually being that good or the Grizz just sucking that bad/tanking? I think we do well against teams with stagnant offenses like OKC, the Grizz, and Boston but Washington just carved us up. Would like to see how we fare against a good team that moves the ball a lot because that would be the barometer for us against Golden State.
It's a good question and I don't know the answer off the top of my head because I have not watched the Grizz much this year. I do know that the Grizz have like the lowest pace in the league, though, so maybe they really aren't prepared to play at such a pace.
But, even if the Grizz suck (and they do) and they like a slower pace, it's still really good that we were able to play at such a pace in the second night of a back-to-back. That's a very good sign for us, even if the opponent is not good. It shows our energy level and athleticism has improved.
We were too old and lacking energy before the deadline. There were articles/quotes out there about how teams could run us out of the gym and we knew it.
Now, we can hang in that style much better. Even if it is against a poor team. And being able to do it on the second night of a back-to-back makes it even more impressive.