- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 12,397
- Reaction score
- 18,865
- Points
- 123
My guess is the team you are thinking about probably used their best blocking TE and moved him to Watt's side every play. I really doubt they moved the LT or RTs around.
-
Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.
The Brian Hoyer thread...
- Thread starter Maximus
- Start date
CosmoKramer
All-Star
- Joined
- Jul 9, 2013
- Messages
- 3,217
- Reaction score
- 7,487
- Points
- 113
Do you prefer buttcracks or terrible CD covers Phills? Wait don't tell me, I want you to be surprised.
Ohio
Woosah
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2011
- Messages
- 41,939
- Reaction score
- 48,791
- Points
- 148
Really all there is to say.
godfather
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 38,849
- Reaction score
- 34,468
- Points
- 148
I knew it was a mistake to click on this thread. I mean yeah, he was terrible today, no doubt.
But he clearly didn't contribute at all to the winning drive either....
Pick6
NBA Starter
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- Messages
- 4,003
- Reaction score
- 2,807
- Points
- 113
playing like crap for 59 minutes and good for 1 minute may be acceptable to you, but it isn't for me, regardless of the result.
Analyzing the three interceptions:
1st one: All on Hoyer. Just a terrible decision. Under-thrown. Totally changed the momentum of the game going into the half. 100 percent Hoyer.
2nd one: Again a terrible decision. Given it was 1st and goal on the 6 and we were running the ball well. Gordon probably should have made more of an effort to at least make it an incomplete pass. 90 percent Hoyer.
3rd one: Miscommunication. Also a bad decision to just heave it up. I'll say 75 percent on Hoyer because I think Gordon didn't run the right route here.
It is one thing to throw INTs. But Hoyer's, especially the first two, were just so costly. Making them seem much worse.
1st one: All on Hoyer. Just a terrible decision. Under-thrown. Totally changed the momentum of the game going into the half. 100 percent Hoyer.
2nd one: Again a terrible decision. Given it was 1st and goal on the 6 and we were running the ball well. Gordon probably should have made more of an effort to at least make it an incomplete pass. 90 percent Hoyer.
3rd one: Miscommunication. Also a bad decision to just heave it up. I'll say 75 percent on Hoyer because I think Gordon didn't run the right route here.
It is one thing to throw INTs. But Hoyer's, especially the first two, were just so costly. Making them seem much worse.
Last edited:
godfather
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2008
- Messages
- 38,849
- Reaction score
- 34,468
- Points
- 148
I don't think I said it was acceptable at all. He did not play good. There's like no one that's going to say different.
If people want to continue to drive the witch hunt to get him out of town, that's fine, you can still do that.
Just admitting you're glad he was able to respond when we needed it won't kill ya though.
Henry Tuttle
NBA Starter
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 1,977
- Reaction score
- 3,769
- Points
- 113
Totally disagree with most here, I think the only really poor throw Hoyer made was the interception on the underthrow, whereas he made a few really great throws. I feel like many are already forgetting what a truly bad QB looks like, which is kind of amazing considering the consistently horrible QB play we've seen for over a decade. He and Josh just didn't have any chemistry on the deep stuff today, which is to be expected and Josh for sure dogged it on the late back of the endzone INT, as he is wont to do from time to time.