So if he comes back at the same level, that's another talented and versatile option for this squad. Probably would take Exum's minutes no?
Our bench will be one of the best in the league.
He wont take many of Exum's minutes. Exum is the backup PG, Garland is the starter, and Sexton is the SG. I think JB wants to keep SG off ball a lot more, focus on his efficient scoring, which has been working.
Dotson and Windler and maybe Okoro and no Nance at the 3 most likely if KPJ can make a comeback.
Really being silent here, and its ok. I personally don't think the rollover car is a concern beyond any injuries he might have. No Chargers, but getting the kids mental issues in check is more important than basketball. Don't want him going down the Delonte path in life
Wow. Disgusting sentiment.
There is a wide spectrum of emotional and/or behavioral disorders that absolutely fall under the umbrella of mental health.
Im not going to speculate further on this specific instance because I don’t know the guy, but let’s at least understand what does and doesn’t exist before starting to justify the same old opinions that got us to today’s mental health stigmas to begin with...
First, there isn't any evidence that he actually has any of those "emotional and/or behavior" disorders. That's something about which you guys are speculating as a possible explanation for his behavior.
Second, even if he did have something that qualified as a "disorder", that wouldn't necessary mean his conduct is excusable. Antisocial Personality Disorder, Borderline Personality Order, and Narcissistic Personal Disorder are examples of legit "disorders" that can lead to shitty behavior, but we wouldn't consider any of those as a justification or excuse for bad conduct. Would we? People are still responsible for the shit they do regardless of whether or not a label ban be attached to it.
Point is, there is a huge difference between unfairly stigmatizing someone because of a mental illness -- such as depression -- and excusing conduct that hurts others. The idea that we shouldn't criticize someone who behaves poorly because they might have a mental disorder is not only poor reasoning, but unfairly lumps together all forms of mental illness as being excusable or worthy of genuine sympathy.
Also, as somebody with depression that has been suicidal before, is on meds, and does weekly therapy, I'd like to point out that it is pretty distasteful to just use it as an excuse to justify behavior.First, there isn't any evidence that he actually has any of those "emotional and/or behavior" disorders. That's something about which you guys are speculating as a possible explanation for his behavior.
Second, even if he did have something that qualified as a "disorder", that wouldn't necessary mean his conduct is excusable. Antisocial Personality Disorder, Borderline Personality Order, and Narcissistic Personal Disorder are examples of legit "disorders" that can lead to shitty behavior, but we wouldn't consider any of those as a justification or excuse for bad conduct. Would we? I mean, it would be pretty easy to rattle off a list of people who had/have some of those, and I don't think many people here would say we shouldn't judge such people because they had a "disorder". People are still responsible for the shit they do regardless of whether or not a label can be attached to it.
Point is, there is a huge difference between unfairly stigmatizing someone because of a mental illness -- such as depression -- and judging/holding people accountable for shitty behavior. The idea that we shouldn't criticize someone who behaves poorly because they might have a mental disorder is not only poor reasoning, but unfairly lumps together all forms of mental illness as being excusable or worthy of genuine sympathy.
KPJ isn't able to play because he has engaged in some undesirable behaviors, the full extent of which we probably don't know. We have seen some of it, though. It's perfectly fair for fans to blame him for that, and also to opine as to whether or not they think he should be retained. Obviously, we don't have complete knowledge all the facts, so some of those opinions will be pulled from our sphincters. But then, that applies to a whole bunch of the opinions we express, so why should this be any different?