- Joined
- Jul 15, 2008
- Messages
- 34,143
- Reaction score
- 64,539
- Points
- 148
No kidding. The last example of that shows the wannabe tackler bowling over the WR attempting to block him.
Yikes. Only 9 more years Raiders.Nice not to be on that side of this garbage for once:
View: https://mobile.twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1119274857080991745?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1119274857080991745&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fforthesports.com%2Fforums%2Fshowthread.php%3Fp%3D353573%23post353573
lolz
Yikes. Only 9 more years Raiders.
Frank Clark to Chiefs. Price is a bit hefty but we are going for it. Just wonder how they can pay everyone.
Guess we will find out. But keep in mind Chiefs are changing their defensive scheme and got rid of Houston too.I know Frank Clark and Dee Ford are different guys with somewhat different skill sets, but is the gap between those two worth a first round pick?
Looking beyond Ford, is the gap between Clark and Trey Flowers worth a 1st AND 2nd round pick?
I thought some of you guys would appreciate this thread.
View: https://twitter.com/CowboysStats/status/1121023648788361216
Yeah, I mean, if you read the Twitter thread I don’t think the author disagrees with you.Don't you run into the issue that what may be true statistically for an entire set isn't true for every member of that set?
I'm just...hesitant about the conclusions we can draw from that kind of data because so much of it is situational. Passes to RB's may indeed get "worse results" than passes to anyone else, but what do you do with that information? Never pass to running backs? Sometimes, that's going to be the best play in a given situation because maybe that is all the defense is giving you.
It's kind of like the condemnation of the mid-range jumper in the NBA. Sure, it's not a great play statistically. But it's also rarely your first option, and guys end up taking those when the open three or dribble drive isn't there, and the clock is ticking.